Kenny Glen P, Flouris Andreas D, Yagouti Abderrahmane, Notley Sean R
Human and Environmental Physiology Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
FAME Laboratory, Department of Exercise Science, University of Thessaly, Trikala, Greece.
Temperature (Austin). 2018 May 11;6(1):11-36. doi: 10.1080/23328940.2018.1456257. eCollection 2019.
Rising environmental temperatures represent a major threat to human health. The activation of heat advisories using evidence-based thresholds for high-risk outdoor ambient temperatures have been shown to be an effective strategy to save lives during hot weather. However, although the relationship between weather and human health has been widely defined by outdoor temperature, corresponding increases in indoor temperature during heat events can also be harmful to health especially in vulnerable populations. In this review, we discuss our current understanding of the relationship between outdoor temperature and human health and examine how human health can also be adversely influenced by high indoor temperatures during heat events. Our assessment of the existing literature revealed a high degree of variability in what can be considered an acceptable indoor temperature because there are differences in how different groups of people may respond physiologically and behaviorally to the same living environment. Finally, we demonstrate that both non-physiological (e.g., geographical location, urban density, building design) and physiological (e.g., sex, age, fitness, state of health) factors must be considered when defining an indoor temperature threshold for preserving human health in a warming global climate.
环境温度上升对人类健康构成重大威胁。利用基于证据的高风险室外环境温度阈值启动高温预警已被证明是在炎热天气下拯救生命的有效策略。然而,尽管天气与人类健康之间的关系已广泛由室外温度界定,但高温事件期间室内温度的相应升高对健康也可能有害,尤其是对弱势群体。在本综述中,我们讨论了目前对室外温度与人类健康关系的理解,并探讨了高温事件期间室内高温如何也会对人类健康产生不利影响。我们对现有文献的评估显示,在什么可被视为可接受的室内温度方面存在很大差异,因为不同人群对相同生活环境的生理和行为反应存在差异。最后,我们表明,在为全球气候变暖背景下维护人类健康定义室内温度阈值时,必须考虑非生理因素(如地理位置、城市密度、建筑设计)和生理因素(如性别、年龄、健康状况、身体机能)。