• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

二氧化碳激光或冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变

Conization by carbon dioxide laser or cold knife in the treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia.

作者信息

Bostofte E, Berget A, Falck Larsen J, Hjortkjaer Pedersen P, Rank F

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(3):199-202. doi: 10.3109/00016348609155170.

DOI:10.3109/00016348609155170
PMID:3090849
Abstract

In a randomized trial concerning 123 women with CIN, 59 were treated with laser conization under colposcope without further hemostatic remedy and 64 with cold knife conization guided by Schiller's iodine dyeing supported by side sutures, vaginal packing and postoperative oral administration of tranexam acid. Follow-up with colposcopy and cytology was done 3 and 12 weeks post-conization and then every 6 months. The average follow-up period was 36 months (28-48). Peroperative bleeding was rather less pronounced in the laser group. Postoperatively, however, bleeding requiring treatment was significantly less common in the laser group (5%) than in the cold knife group (17%). The recurrence rate of CIN was 7% in the laser group and 10% in the knife group. Stenosis of the cervical canal developed in 7% of the patients in the laser group and in 3.5% in the knife group. After 12 weeks the squamocolumnar junction was visible in its full extent in 66% of the laser treated patients compared with 38% of the cold knife treated patients. It is concluded that laser conization is a safe procedure even without hemostatic procedures other than the coagulation abilities of the laser beam itself, as used in this work.

摘要

在一项针对123例宫颈上皮内瘤变(CIN)女性患者的随机试验中,59例患者接受了阴道镜下激光锥切术,未采取进一步的止血措施;64例患者接受了在席勒碘染色引导下的冷刀锥切术,并辅以侧方缝合、阴道填塞及术后口服氨甲环酸。锥切术后3周和12周进行阴道镜检查和细胞学检查随访,之后每6个月随访一次。平均随访期为36个月(28 - 48个月)。激光组术中出血情况相对不那么明显。然而,术后需要治疗的出血在激光组(5%)明显比冷刀组(17%)少见。CIN的复发率在激光组为7%,在冷刀组为10%。激光组7%的患者出现宫颈管狭窄,冷刀组为3.5%。12周后,66%接受激光治疗的患者鳞柱交界完全可见,而接受冷刀治疗的患者这一比例为38%。结论是,如本研究中所采用的,即使不采用除激光束自身凝血能力之外的止血措施,激光锥切术也是一种安全的手术方法。

相似文献

1
Conization by carbon dioxide laser or cold knife in the treatment of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia.二氧化碳激光或冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1986;65(3):199-202. doi: 10.3109/00016348609155170.
2
A comparison of complications of laser and cold knife conization.激光与冷刀锥切术并发症的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1983 Aug;62(2):213-7.
3
[Clinical evaluation of the treatment of early cervical neoplasia by carbon dioxide laser conization].[二氧化碳激光锥切术治疗早期宫颈肿瘤的临床评估]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1990 Jan;42(1):93-8.
4
A randomized prospective study comparing three techniques of conization: cold knife, laser, and LEEP.一项比较三种锥切技术(冷刀、激光和环形电切术)的随机前瞻性研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Aug;54(2):175-9. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1189.
5
Rational use of cryosurgery and cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.冷冻手术与冷刀锥切术治疗宫颈上皮内瘤变的合理应用。
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1992;13(6):507-13.
6
Laser conization versus cold knife conization.
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1982 Jan;154(1):59-61.
7
Outpatient cervical conization with the CO2 laser.门诊二氧化碳激光宫颈锥切术。
J Reprod Med. 1985 Aug;30(8):607-9.
8
[Treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia before and after introduction of laser conization].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2005 Jan 20;125(2):167-9.
9
[A comparison between CO2 laser conization and cold knife conization in clinical diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia].[二氧化碳激光锥切术与冷刀锥切术在宫颈上皮内瘤变临床诊断中的比较]
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi. 1989 Nov;41(11):1755-60.
10
Cold-knife and laser conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Oct;76(4):633-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Cervical Regeneration Following Monopolar Electrosurgical Conization: A Prospective Evaluation of Volume, Length, and Transformation Zone Reformation.单极电刀宫颈锥切术后的宫颈再生:对体积、长度和转化区重塑的前瞻性评估
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 21;14(16):5918. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165918.
2
Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity.子宫颈狭窄:从分类到管理进展。克服进入子宫腔的障碍。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):755-764. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07126-1. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
3
Labor Complicated by Cervical Stenosis Following a Laser Cone Biopsy.
激光锥形活检后并发宫颈管狭窄的分娩
J Med Cases. 2021 Jan;12(1):13-15. doi: 10.14740/jmc3605. Epub 2020 Nov 18.
4
Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 4;2013(12):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub3.
5
Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.宫颈上皮内瘤变的手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Jun 16(6):CD001318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001318.pub2.
6
Perinatal mortality and other severe adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: meta-analysis.围产期死亡率及与宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗相关的其他严重不良妊娠结局:荟萃分析
BMJ. 2008 Sep 18;337:a1284. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1284.
7
Screening for cancer of the cervix uteri.
World J Surg. 1989 Jan-Feb;13(1):71-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01671157.
8
Conization for CIN associated with human papillomavirus infection.与人类乳头瘤病毒感染相关的CIN的锥切术。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 1991;249(2):59-65. doi: 10.1007/BF02390363.