Department of Health Promotion, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Health Promotion, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism (NUTRIM), Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Nutrients. 2019 Mar 22;11(3):689. doi: 10.3390/nu11030689.
Schools can help to improve children's health. The 'Healthy Primary School of the Future' (HPSF) aims to sustainably integrate health and well-being into the school system. This study examined the effects of HPSF on children's dietary and physical activity (PA) behaviours after 1 and 2 years' follow-up. The study ( = 1676 children) has a quasi-experimental design with four intervention schools, i.e., two full HPSF (focus: nutrition and PA) and two partial HPSF (focus: PA), and four control schools. Accelerometers and child- and parent-reported questionnaires were used at baseline, after 1 (T1) and 2 (T2) years. Mixed-model analyses showed significant favourable effects for the full HPSF versus control schools for, among others, school water consumption (effect size (ES) = 1.03 (T1), 1.14 (T2)), lunch intake of vegetables (odds ratio (OR) = 3.17 (T1), 4.39 (T2)) and dairy products (OR = 4.43 (T1), 4.52 (T2)), sedentary time (ES = -0.23 (T2)) and light PA (ES = 0.22 (T2)). Almost no significant favourable effects were found for partial HPSF compared to control schools. We conclude that the full HPSF is effective in promoting children's health behaviours at T1 and T2 compared with control schools. Focusing on both nutrition and PA components seems to be more effective in promoting healthy behaviours than focusing exclusively on PA.
学校可以帮助改善儿童的健康状况。“未来健康小学”(HPSF)旨在将健康和幸福感可持续地融入学校系统。本研究在 1 年和 2 年的随访后,调查了 HPSF 对儿童饮食和体育活动(PA)行为的影响。该研究(=1676 名儿童)采用准实验设计,设有 4 所干预学校,即 2 所全 HPSF(重点:营养和 PA)和 2 所部分 HPSF(重点:PA),以及 4 所对照学校。在基线、1 年(T1)和 2 年(T2)时使用加速度计和儿童及家长报告问卷进行测量。混合模型分析显示,全 HPSF 与对照学校相比,具有显著有利的效果,特别是在学校饮用水消耗(效应量(ES)=1.03(T1),1.14(T2))、午餐蔬菜摄入量(优势比(OR)=3.17(T1),4.39(T2))和乳制品(OR=4.43(T1),4.52(T2))、久坐时间(ES=-0.23(T2))和低强度 PA(ES=0.22(T2))。与对照学校相比,部分 HPSF 几乎没有发现显著有利的效果。我们的结论是,与对照学校相比,全 HPSF 在 T1 和 T2 时更有效地促进儿童的健康行为。关注营养和 PA 两个方面似乎比仅关注 PA 更能促进健康行为。