• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社区牙科课程中对操作技能的直接观察对学生学习和满意度的影响。

The Effect of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills on Learning and Satisfaction of Students in Community Dentistry Course.

作者信息

Dabaghi Tabriz Fatemeh, Bahramian Ayla, Asdagh Saeede, Ghadimi Farnaz, Katebi Katayoun

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.

出版信息

J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):111-117. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.100431.1890. eCollection 2024 Apr.

DOI:10.30476/JAMP.2023.100431.1890
PMID:38660432
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11036320/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Direct Observation of Practical Skills (DOPS) tests is a valuable method for clinical assessment. This study aimed to implement the DOPS test to assess the procedural skills of community dentistry courses and its effects on mastery learning and satisfaction of professors and students at Tabriz faculty of dentistry in 2021-2022.

METHODS

In a quasi-experimental study, 60 dentistry students of a class were assigned into two study (n=30) and control (n=30) groups by Permuted block randomization. In the case group, the skills were related to Fluoride therapy, fissure sealant therapy, and health education evaluated by DOPS. In the control group, these skills were evaluated by traditional evaluation methods. Each test was repeated three times. Finally, the satisfaction of students in the case group was assessed by a questionnaire. The chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Repeated measure ANOVA test was used to compare the mean scores in three stages and two groups. P value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS 16 software.

RESULTS

A significant difference in the mean score of Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education was seen between the case and control groups (P<0.001). Also a significant increase in these skills in the third stage of assessment in the case group was observed (P<0.001). The professors and students' satisfaction was considerably high on the DOPS test.

CONCLUSION

The DOPS method had more impact on Fluoride therapy, pit and fissure sealant therapy, and health education's learning process in dentistry students than the conventional evaluation. The professors and students' satisfaction level was high regarding DOPS. The advantages of the DOPS method are student-centeredness, objectivity, and appropriate feedback.

摘要

引言

实践技能直接观察法(DOPS)测试是临床评估的一种重要方法。本研究旨在实施DOPS测试,以评估2021 - 2022年大不里士牙科学院社区牙科课程的操作技能,及其对教授和学生掌握学习情况和满意度的影响。

方法

在一项准实验研究中,通过排列分组随机化将一个班级的60名牙科学生分为两个研究组(n = 30)和对照组(n = 30)。在病例组中,技能涉及氟化物治疗、窝沟封闭治疗和健康教育,通过DOPS进行评估。在对照组中,这些技能通过传统评估方法进行评估。每个测试重复三次。最后,通过问卷调查评估病例组学生的满意度。采用卡方检验比较定性变量。重复测量方差分析用于比较三个阶段和两组的平均得分。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。数据使用SPSS 16软件进行分析。

结果

病例组和对照组在氟化物治疗、窝沟封闭治疗和健康教育的平均得分上存在显著差异(P < 0.001)。此外,在病例组评估的第三阶段,这些技能也有显著提高(P < 0.001)。教授和学生对DOPS测试的满意度相当高。

结论

与传统评估相比,DOPS方法对牙科学生氟化物治疗、窝沟封闭治疗和健康教育的学习过程有更大影响。教授和学生对DOPS的满意度较高。DOPS方法的优点是以学生为中心、客观且反馈恰当。

相似文献

1
The Effect of Direct Observation of Procedural Skills on Learning and Satisfaction of Students in Community Dentistry Course.社区牙科课程中对操作技能的直接观察对学生学习和满意度的影响。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2024 Apr 1;12(2):111-117. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2023.100431.1890. eCollection 2024 Apr.
2
Comparison of midwifery students' satisfaction with direct observation of procedural skills and current methods in evaluation of procedural skills in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School.马什哈德护理与助产学校助产专业学生对程序技能直接观察法与现行程序技能评估方法满意度的比较
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Mar;18(2):94-100.
3
The effect of direct observation of procedural skills/mini-clinical evaluation exercise on the satisfaction and clinical skills of nursing students in dialysis.直接观察操作技能/微型临床评估练习对透析护理专业学生满意度及临床技能的影响
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Feb 27;10:74. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_618_20. eCollection 2021.
4
The effect of direct observation of procedural skills method on learning clinical skills of midwifery students of medical sciences.直接观察程序技能法对医学科学助产专业学生临床技能学习的影响。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:91. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_672_19. eCollection 2020.
5
The Effect of Applying Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) on Nursing Students' Clinical Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial.应用操作技能直接观察法(DOPS)对护生临床技能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Glob J Health Sci. 2015 Mar 26;7(7 Spec No):17-21. doi: 10.5539/gjhs.v7n7p17.
6
Changing trends in assessment: Effectiveness of Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) as an assessment tool in anesthesiology postgraduate students.评估趋势的变化:直接观察操作技能(DOPS)作为麻醉学研究生评估工具的有效性。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):275-280. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_329_20. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
7
DOPS (Direct Observation of Procedural Skills) in undergraduate skills-lab: Does it work? Analysis of skills-performance and curricular side effects.本科技能实验室中的直接操作技能观察(DOPS):它有效吗?技能表现及课程副作用分析
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Oct 15;32(4):Doc45. doi: 10.3205/zma000987. eCollection 2015.
8
Using Modified Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) to assess undergraduate medical students.使用改良的操作技能直接观察法(DOPS)评估本科医学生。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2018 Jul;6(3):130-136.
9
Clinical procedural skills assessment during internship in ophthalmology.眼科实习期间的临床操作技能评估。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019 Apr;7(2):56-61. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2019.44709.
10
The effect of formative evaluation using "direct observation of procedural skills" (DOPS) method on the extent of learning practical skills among nursing students in the ICU.采用“操作技能直接观察法”(DOPS)进行形成性评价对重症监护病房护理专业学生实践技能学习程度的影响。
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2013 Jul;18(4):290-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Review of the validity of DOPS as an assessment tool for the procedural skills of surgical trainees.手术培训生程序性技能的 DOPS 评估工具的有效性评价。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):599-606. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0052. Epub 2022 Nov 14.
2
Changing trends in assessment: Effectiveness of Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) as an assessment tool in anesthesiology postgraduate students.评估趋势的变化:直接观察操作技能(DOPS)作为麻醉学研究生评估工具的有效性。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Apr-Jun;38(2):275-280. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_329_20. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
3
Formative objective structured clinical examination with immediate feedback improves surgical clerks' self-confidence and clinical competence.带有即时反馈的形成性客观结构化临床考试可提高外科实习医生的自信心和临床能力。
Med Teach. 2023 Feb;45(2):212-218. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2126755. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
4
Has the OSCE Met Its Final Demise? Rebalancing Clinical Assessment Approaches in the Peri-Pandemic World.客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)是否已走到尽头?在疫情期间及之后的世界重新平衡临床评估方法。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 21;9:825502. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.825502. eCollection 2022.
5
An educational approach for early student self-assessment in clinical periodontology.临床牙周病学中早期学生自我评估的教育方法。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jan 12;22(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-03078-9.
6
The effect of direct observation of procedural skills/mini-clinical evaluation exercise on the satisfaction and clinical skills of nursing students in dialysis.直接观察操作技能/微型临床评估练习对透析护理专业学生满意度及临床技能的影响
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Feb 27;10:74. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_618_20. eCollection 2021.
7
Introduction of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) as a formative assessment tool during postgraduate training in anaesthesiology: Exploration of perceptions.将直接观察操作技能(DOPS)作为麻醉学研究生培训期间的形成性评估工具的介绍:认知探索
Indian J Anaesth. 2021 Mar;65(3):202-209. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_124_20. Epub 2021 Mar 13.
8
Are workplace-based assessment methods (DOPS and Mini-CEX) effective in nursing students' clinical skills? A single-blind randomized, parallel group, controlled trial.基于工作场所的评估方法(直接观察操作技能和迷你临床演练评估)对护生临床技能是否有效?一项单盲随机平行组对照试验。
Contemp Nurse. 2019 Dec;55(6):565-575. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2020.1735941. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
9
Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessment in diagnostic gastroscopy: nationwide evidence of validity and competency development during training.诊断性胃镜操作技能的直接观察评估(DOPS):全国范围内培训期间有效性和能力发展的证据。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jan;34(1):105-114. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06737-7. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
10
Direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) evaluation method: Systematic review of evidence.操作技能直接观察(DOPS)评估方法:证据的系统评价
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2018 Jun 3;32:45. doi: 10.14196/mjiri.32.45. eCollection 2018.