• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用可配置座椅对座椅/乘员接触力及其与初始不适感的关系进行参数研究。

A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat.

机构信息

a Université de Lyon , Lyon , France.

b Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 , Villeurbanne , France.

出版信息

Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):891-902. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1600050. Epub 2019 Apr 30.

DOI:10.1080/00140139.2019.1600050
PMID:30912482
Abstract

The present work investigates the contact forces between sitters and seat as well as their correlations with perceived discomfort. Twelve different economy class aeroplane seat configurations were simulated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat by varying seat pan and backrest angles, as well as seat pan compressed surface. Eighteen males and 18 females, selected by their body mass index and stature, tested these configurations for two sitting postures. Perceived discomfort was significantly affected by seat parameters and posture and correlated both with normal force distribution on the seat-pan surface and with normal forces at the lumbar and head supports. Lower discomfort ratings were obtained for more evenly distributed normal forces on the seat pan. Shear force at the seat pan surface was at its lowest when sitters were allowed to self-select their seat-pan angle, supporting that a shear force should be reduced but not zeroed to improve seating comfort. The effects of seat-pan and backrest angle, anthropometric dimensions and sitting posture on contact forces and perceived discomfort were investigated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat. In addition to preferred seat profile parameters, the present work provides quantitative guidelines on contact force requirement for improving seating comfort.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨坐姿者与座椅之间的接触力及其与不适感之间的相关性。通过改变座椅座垫和椅背角度以及座垫压缩面,使用多调节实验座椅模拟了 12 种不同的经济舱飞机座椅配置。18 名男性和 18 名女性根据其体重指数和身高选择了这些配置进行两种坐姿测试。不适感显著受到座椅参数和坐姿的影响,并与座垫表面的正压力分布以及腰部和头部支撑处的正压力相关。座垫上的正压力分布更加均匀,不适感的评分越低。当允许坐姿者自行选择座垫角度时,座垫表面的剪切力最低,这表明为了提高座椅舒适度,应该减少剪切力,但不应将其降为零。使用多调节实验座椅研究了座椅座垫和椅背角度、人体测量尺寸和坐姿对接触力和不适感的影响。除了首选的座椅轮廓参数外,本研究还提供了关于改善座椅舒适度的接触力要求的定量指南。

相似文献

1
A parametric investigation on seat/occupant contact forces and their relationship with initially perceived discomfort using a configurable seat.采用可配置座椅对座椅/乘员接触力及其与初始不适感的关系进行参数研究。
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):891-902. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1600050. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
2
Effects of seat parameters and sitters' anthropometric dimensions on seat profile and optimal compressed seat pan surface.座椅参数和坐姿者人体测量尺寸对座椅轮廓和最佳压缩座垫表面的影响。
Appl Ergon. 2018 Nov;73:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.015. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
3
Biomechanical investigation of prolonged driving in an ergonomically designed truck seat prototype.人体工程学设计卡车座椅原型的长时间驾驶的生物力学研究。
Ergonomics. 2018 Mar;61(3):367-380. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1355070. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
4
Objective and subjective evaluation of a new airplane seat with an optimally pre-shaped foam support.新型飞机座椅的客观和主观评价,该座椅采用了优化的预成型泡沫支撑。
Work. 2021;68(s1):S257-S271. doi: 10.3233/WOR-208024.
5
Pressure sensing of an aircraft passenger seat with lumbar control.带有腰部控制的飞机乘客座椅压力感应。
Appl Ergon. 2020 Apr;84:103006. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103006. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
6
Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes.带有可调节坐骨和背部支撑的座椅:生物力学变化
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 1;28(11):1113-21; discussion 1121-2. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000068243.63203.A8.
7
The effects of the seat cushion contour and the sitting posture on surface pressure distribution and comfort during seated work.座椅垫轮廓和坐姿对坐姿工作时表面压力分布和舒适度的影响。
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Sep 17;33(5):675-689. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01582. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Implementing spring-foam technology to design a lightweight and comfortable aircraft seat-pan.采用弹簧泡沫技术设计一款轻便舒适的飞机座椅座板。
Appl Ergon. 2021 Feb;91:103174. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103174. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
9
Ergonomic evaluation of a new truck seat design: a field study.新型卡车座椅设计的工效学评估:现场研究。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2019 Sep;25(3):331-343. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2017.1348056. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Comfort and pressure distribution in a human contour shaped aircraft seat (developed with 3D scans of the human body).人体轮廓形状的飞机座椅(通过人体3D扫描技术开发)的舒适性和压力分布。
Work. 2016 Aug 12;54(4):925-40. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162363.

引用本文的文献

1
Comprehensive analysis of smart bed comfort across varied resting conditions using quantitative measures.使用定量测量方法对不同休息条件下智能床的舒适度进行综合分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 3;20(7):e0327241. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327241. eCollection 2025.
2
Influences of cushion contour on passenger comfort and interface pressure in high-speed train.高铁中坐垫轮廓对乘客舒适度和界面压力的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 13;18(2):e0276900. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276900. eCollection 2023.
3
Comparing the Interface pressure distribution of the full body chest-lumbar cushion made of memory cotton with the traditional chest cushion.
比较记忆棉全身胸腰垫与传统胸垫的界面压力分布。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 30;22(1):839. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04668-w.