a Université de Lyon , Lyon , France.
b Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 , Villeurbanne , France.
Ergonomics. 2019 Jul;62(7):891-902. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2019.1600050. Epub 2019 Apr 30.
The present work investigates the contact forces between sitters and seat as well as their correlations with perceived discomfort. Twelve different economy class aeroplane seat configurations were simulated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat by varying seat pan and backrest angles, as well as seat pan compressed surface. Eighteen males and 18 females, selected by their body mass index and stature, tested these configurations for two sitting postures. Perceived discomfort was significantly affected by seat parameters and posture and correlated both with normal force distribution on the seat-pan surface and with normal forces at the lumbar and head supports. Lower discomfort ratings were obtained for more evenly distributed normal forces on the seat pan. Shear force at the seat pan surface was at its lowest when sitters were allowed to self-select their seat-pan angle, supporting that a shear force should be reduced but not zeroed to improve seating comfort. The effects of seat-pan and backrest angle, anthropometric dimensions and sitting posture on contact forces and perceived discomfort were investigated using a multi-adjustable experimental seat. In addition to preferred seat profile parameters, the present work provides quantitative guidelines on contact force requirement for improving seating comfort.
本研究旨在探讨坐姿者与座椅之间的接触力及其与不适感之间的相关性。通过改变座椅座垫和椅背角度以及座垫压缩面,使用多调节实验座椅模拟了 12 种不同的经济舱飞机座椅配置。18 名男性和 18 名女性根据其体重指数和身高选择了这些配置进行两种坐姿测试。不适感显著受到座椅参数和坐姿的影响,并与座垫表面的正压力分布以及腰部和头部支撑处的正压力相关。座垫上的正压力分布更加均匀,不适感的评分越低。当允许坐姿者自行选择座垫角度时,座垫表面的剪切力最低,这表明为了提高座椅舒适度,应该减少剪切力,但不应将其降为零。使用多调节实验座椅研究了座椅座垫和椅背角度、人体测量尺寸和坐姿对接触力和不适感的影响。除了首选的座椅轮廓参数外,本研究还提供了关于改善座椅舒适度的接触力要求的定量指南。