Verbaarschot Ceci, Haselager Pim, Farquhar Jason
Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Mar 12;13:68. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00068. eCollection 2019.
Having an intention to act is commonly operationalized as the moment at which awareness of an urge or decision to act arises. Measuring this moment has been challenging due to the dependence on first-person reports of subjective experience rather than objective behavioral or neural measurements. Commonly, this challenge is met using (variants of) Libet's clock method. In 2008, Matsuhashi and Hallett published a novel probing strategy as an alternative to the clock method. We believe their probe method could provide a valuable addition to the clock method because: it measures the timing of an intention in real-time, it can be combined with additional (tactile, visual or auditory) stimuli to create a more ecologically valid experimental context, and it allows the measurement of the point of no return. Yet to this date, the probe method has not been applied widely - possibly due to concerns about the effects that the probes might have on the intention and/or action preparation processes. To address these concerns, a 2 × 2 within-subject design is tested. In this design, two variables are manipulated: (1) the requirement of an introspection report and (2) the presence of an auditory probe. Three observables are measured that provide information about the timing of an intention to act: (1) awareness reports of the subjective experience of having an intention, (2) neural preparatory activity for action, and (3) behavioral data of the performed actions. The presence of probes was found to speed up mean action times by roughly 300 ms, but did not alter the neural preparation for action. The requirement of an introspection report did influence brain signals: reducing the amplitude of the readiness potential and increasing the desynchronization in the alpha and beta bands over the motor cortex prior to action onset. By discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the probe method compared to the clock method, we hope to demonstrate its added value and promote its use in future research.
有行动意图通常被定义为产生冲动意识或行动决定的时刻。由于依赖于对主观体验的第一人称报告而非客观行为或神经测量,测量这个时刻一直具有挑战性。通常,使用(利贝特时钟方法的变体)来应对这一挑战。2008年,松桥和哈雷特发表了一种新颖的探测策略作为时钟方法的替代方案。我们认为他们的探测方法可以为时钟方法提供有价值的补充,因为:它能实时测量意图的时间,它可以与额外的(触觉、视觉或听觉)刺激相结合,以创建更符合生态效度的实验情境,并且它允许测量不可逆转点。然而,迄今为止,探测方法尚未得到广泛应用——这可能是由于担心探测可能对意图和/或行动准备过程产生的影响。为了解决这些问题,测试了一种2×2的被试内设计。在这个设计中,操纵了两个变量:(1)内省报告的要求和(2)听觉探测的存在。测量了三个可观察指标,它们提供了有关行动意图时间的信息:(1)有意图的主观体验的意识报告,(2)行动的神经准备活动,以及(3)所执行行动的行为数据。发现探测的存在使平均行动时间加快了约300毫秒,但没有改变行动的神经准备。内省报告的要求确实影响了脑信号:在行动开始前,降低了准备电位的幅度,并增加了运动皮层上α和β波段的去同步化。通过讨论探测方法与时钟方法相比的优缺点,我们希望展示其附加价值,并促进其在未来研究中的应用。