• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估西班牙语版家长 strengths and difficulties questionnaire(sdq)在洪都拉斯的因子结构。

Assessing the factor structure of the Spanish language parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Honduras.

机构信息

Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Essentia Health, Duluth, Minnesota, United States of America.

School of Sociology, National Autonomous University of Honduras, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214394. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0214394
PMID:30921369
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438563/
Abstract

With worldwide prevalence rates between 10% and 20%, mental illness in children and adolescents is an issue for which culturally sensitive screening tools are needed. The Strengths & Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a commonly used measure that has been translated into numerous languages, although some research suggests issues with cross-cultural validity. Only four other studies have tested the Spanish-language SDQ in Latin America. In this study, we aimed to help fill this gap by assessing the factor structure of the parent or teacher version of the Spanish-language SDQ (for children ages 4-17) with 967 parent or other caregiver respondents of primary school-aged children (ages 4 to 17) in the Department of Intibucá, Honduras. When unable to find a good fitting factor model previously identified in the literature, we conducted split sample exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), along with measurement invariance testing with the best fitting EFA-extracted model based on gender for caregiver respondent and child gender. Results showed that while many EFA models had a good fit, CFI and TLI was < .90 for all extracted models when confirmed in the second sample with CFA. We then modified the best fitting extracted three-factor, 24-item model, which dropped item 15, by allowing select item residuals to correlate, increasing CFI and TLI to > .90 for female child gender. This modified three-factor model was partially invariant for configural and scalar models between child genders. Configural and scalar models would not converge for adult genders. Of note, metric models were not produced in Mplus related to items' cross-loading on more than one factor. These findings suggest that the SDQ Spanish language parent or teacher version may not perform optimally cross-culturally in this area of Honduras. Future research should confirm these findings with other Honduran populations.

摘要

儿童和青少年精神疾病的全球患病率在 10%至 20%之间,因此需要使用对文化敏感的筛查工具。《长处和困难问卷》(SDQ)是一种常用的测量工具,已经被翻译成多种语言,但一些研究表明其存在跨文化有效性的问题。仅有四项其他研究在拉丁美洲测试了西班牙语版的 SDQ。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过评估西班牙语版 SDQ 家长或教师版(适用于 4-17 岁儿童)的因子结构来填补这一空白,该研究共纳入了洪都拉斯因蒂布卡省 967 名小学生(4-17 岁)的家长或其他照顾者。当无法找到文献中先前确定的良好拟合因子模型时,我们进行了分割样本探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA),并根据性别对照顾者和儿童的性别进行了最佳拟合 EFA 提取模型的测量不变性测试。结果表明,虽然许多 EFA 模型拟合良好,但当在第二个样本中使用 CFA 对所有提取模型进行确认时,CFI 和 TLI 均<0.90。然后,我们修改了最佳拟合的三因子、24 项模型,删除了第 15 项,通过允许选择项目残差相关,将 CFI 和 TLI 提高到女性儿童性别>0.90。该修改后的三因子模型在儿童性别之间的组态和标量模型上具有部分不变性。成人性别无法收敛配置和标量模型。值得注意的是,在 Mplus 中没有针对项目在多个因子上的交叉负荷生成度量模型。这些发现表明,SDQ 西班牙语家长或教师版在洪都拉斯的这一地区可能无法在跨文化方面表现最佳。未来的研究应在其他洪都拉斯人群中确认这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/4ef341eefb66/pone.0214394.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/d9616356d721/pone.0214394.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/a148f32b16cc/pone.0214394.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/4ef341eefb66/pone.0214394.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/d9616356d721/pone.0214394.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/a148f32b16cc/pone.0214394.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e279/6438563/4ef341eefb66/pone.0214394.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing the factor structure of the Spanish language parent Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) in Honduras.评估西班牙语版家长 strengths and difficulties questionnaire(sdq)在洪都拉斯的因子结构。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 28;14(3):e0214394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214394. eCollection 2019.
2
Malaysian Parent Ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Factor Structure and Measurement Invariance Across Language Versions, Gender, Informants, and Race.马来西亚家长对《长处和困难问卷》的评价:跨语言版本、性别、信息提供者和种族的因素结构和测量不变性。
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1971-1984. doi: 10.1177/1073191118787284. Epub 2018 Jul 13.
3
Mental health difficulties in children and adolescents: The study of the SDQ in the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012.儿童和青少年的心理健康问题:2011-2012 年西班牙国家健康调查中的 SDQ 研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
4
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Parents for Italian School-Aged Children: Psychometric Properties and Norms.意大利学龄儿童家长版优势与困难问卷:心理测量特性与常模
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2018 Feb;49(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s10578-017-0723-2.
5
Psychometric properties of the Arabic self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire.优势与困难问卷阿拉伯语自陈版本的心理测量特性
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Dec;59:211-220. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.09.002. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
6
Evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a nationally representative sample of Canadian children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years.评估家长评定的 Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire 在加拿大 6 至 17 岁儿童和青少年全国代表性样本中的心理计量特性。
Health Rep. 2020 Aug 19;31(8):13-20. doi: 10.25318/82-003-x202000800002-eng.
7
Teacher Versus Parent Informant Measurement Invariance of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.教师与家长信息源测量的《长处和困难问卷》不变性。
J Pediatr Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;46(10):1249-1257. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsab062.
8
The internal structure of foster-parent completed SDQ for school-aged children.寄养父母完成的针对学龄儿童的优势与困难问卷的内部结构。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 30;12(6):e0176625. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176625. eCollection 2017.
9
Psychometric properties of the self-report version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in the Ecuadorian context: an evaluation of four models.《自我报告版长处和困难问卷在厄瓜多尔背景下的心理测量特性:对四个模型的评估》
BMC Psychol. 2019 Aug 6;7(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40359-019-0328-6.
10
Age-specific norms and validation of the German SDQ parent version based on a nationally representative sample (KiGGS).基于全国代表性样本(KiGGS)的德国 SDQ 家长版的年龄特异性常模和验证。
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;29(2):123-136. doi: 10.1007/s00787-019-01337-1. Epub 2019 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Early adversity and prosocial behavior in adolescents from Bogotá: a cross-sectional study.波哥大青少年的早期逆境与亲社会行为:一项横断面研究。
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2024 Jul 8;18(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13034-024-00768-2.
2
Validation of the Spanish version of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC) to identify and assess psychosocial problems among early adolescents in Chile.验证西班牙语版儿科症状清单(PSC)在智利早期青少年中识别和评估心理社会问题的有效性。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 6;18(4):e0283921. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283921. eCollection 2023.
3
Reverse-Coded Items Do Not Work in Spanish: Data From Four Samples Using Established Measures.

本文引用的文献

1
The assessment of emotional and Behavioural problems: Internal structure of The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.情绪与行为问题评估:长处与困难问卷的内部结构
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2015 Sep-Dec;15(3):265-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 22.
2
SDQ in the Hands of Fathers and Preschool Teachers-Psychometric Properties in a Non-clinical Sample of 3-5-Year-Olds.父亲和幼儿教师手中的优势与困难问卷——3至5岁非临床样本中的心理测量特性
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2019 Feb;50(1):132-141. doi: 10.1007/s10578-018-0826-4.
3
[Not Available].
反向编码项目在西班牙语中不适用:来自四个使用既定测量方法的样本的数据。
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 23;13:828037. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.828037. eCollection 2022.
[无可用内容]。
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2017 Dec 20;137(4). doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.17.0639. Print 2018 Feb 20.
4
Mental health among children and adolescents: Construct validity, reliability, and parent-adolescent agreement on the 'Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire' in Chile.智利儿童和青少年的心理健康:“长处与困难问卷”的结构效度、信度及父母与青少年的一致性
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 5;13(2):e0191809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191809. eCollection 2018.
5
Mental health difficulties in children and adolescents: The study of the SDQ in the Spanish National Health Survey 2011-2012.儿童和青少年的心理健康问题:2011-2012 年西班牙国家健康调查中的 SDQ 研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2018 Jan;259:236-242. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.10.025. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
6
Parent Ratings of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: What Is the Optimum Factor Model?家长评定的长处和困难问卷:最优因子模型是什么?
Assessment. 2019 Sep;26(6):1142-1153. doi: 10.1177/1073191117721743. Epub 2017 Jul 22.
7
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Factor Structure and Gender Equivalence in Norwegian Adolescents.优势与困难问卷(SDQ):挪威青少年的因素结构与性别等效性
PLoS One. 2016 May 3;11(5):e0152202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152202. eCollection 2016.
8
Estimating the true global burden of mental illness.估算精神疾病的真实全球负担。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Feb;3(2):171-8. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Singaporean kindergartners.新加坡幼儿园儿童优势与困难问卷的验证性因素分析。
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Jan;42(1):109-16. doi: 10.1111/cch.12288. Epub 2015 Oct 16.
10
Global Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Culturally Informed Focus.全球儿童和青少年心理健康:基于文化视角的关注重点
Child Adolesc Psychiatr Clin N Am. 2015 Oct;24(4):823-30. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Jul 23.