• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较 6 种疗法治疗下咽和喉肿瘤的疗效:网状荟萃分析。

Comparative efficacy of six therapies for Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal neoplasms: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Binzhou Medical University Hospital, No. 661 Second Huanghe Road, Binzhou, 256603, Shandong, China.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5412-z.

DOI:10.1186/s12885-019-5412-z
PMID:30922243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6439970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal neoplasms are both fatal and hard to catch in early stages. Yet which treatment is the most efficacious one still remain unanswered. This network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to investigate effectiveness of six therapies being utilized in clinical practice nowadays.

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were retrieved to synthesize data. Direct and indirect evidence was combined to compare efficacy of treatments. A relative ranking of the six regimens was calculated by the surface under the curve ranking area (SUCRA).

RESULTS

A total of 28 trials with 9109 patients were included in our NMA. Five endpoints investigated included 3/5-year overall survival (3/5-OS), 3/5-year disease free survival (3/5-DFS) and 5-year overall survival rate (5-OSR). In terms of all efficacy outcomes, radiotherapy combined with surgery (RT + S) proved to be better than other therapies while radiotherapy (RT) alone also performed well. Induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) was the best regarding 3-DFS (SUCRA = 0.846) while current chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) ranked first in 5-DFS (SUCRA = 0.933) according to SUCRA results. No significant differences were demonstrated in 5-DFS and 5-OSR as shown in the results of NMA.

CONCLUSIONS

RT combined with surgery turned out to be optimal therapy of all the outcomes while the efficacy of RT was relatively poorer in the treatment of patients with larynx stage III-IV and hypopharynx stage II-IV. Also, the good performance of CCRT and ICRT in terms of DFS made them as secondary recommended therapies. There is no significant difference between surgery and transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) alone.

摘要

背景

下咽和喉肿瘤均具有致命性且难以早期发现。然而,哪种治疗方法最有效仍未得到解答。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在研究目前临床实践中使用的六种疗法的有效性。

方法

检索 PubMed 和 Embase 以综合数据。结合直接和间接证据来比较治疗效果。通过曲线下面积排序区域(SUCRA)计算六种方案的相对排名。

结果

共纳入 28 项试验,包含 9109 例患者。五项研究终点包括 3/5 年总生存率(3/5-OS)、3/5 年无病生存率(3/5-DFS)和 5 年总生存率(5-OSR)。在所有疗效指标中,放疗联合手术(RT+S)优于其他疗法,而单纯放疗(RT)也表现良好。诱导放化疗(ICRT)在 3-DFS 方面最佳(SUCRA=0.846),而当前放化疗(CCRT)在 5-DFS 方面排名第一(SUCRA=0.933)。NMA 结果表明,5-DFS 和 5-OSR 无显著差异。

结论

RT 联合手术是所有结果的最佳治疗方法,而 RT 对喉癌 III-IV 期和下咽癌 II-IV 期患者的疗效相对较差。此外,CCRT 和 ICRT 在 DFS 方面的良好表现使它们成为二线推荐治疗方法。手术和单纯经口激光微创手术(TLM)之间无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy of six therapies for Hypopharyngeal and laryngeal neoplasms: a network meta-analysis.比较 6 种疗法治疗下咽和喉肿瘤的疗效:网状荟萃分析。
BMC Cancer. 2019 Mar 29;19(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5412-z.
2
Induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by radiotherapy (RT) versus cetuximab plus IC and RT in advanced laryngeal/hypopharyngeal cancer resectable only by total laryngectomy-final results of the larynx organ preservation trial DeLOS-II.诱导化疗(IC)加放疗(RT)与西妥昔单抗加 IC 和 RT 联合治疗仅可全喉切除术切除的晚期喉/下咽癌:DeLOS-II 喉器官保存试验的最终结果。
Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct 1;29(10):2105-2114. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy332.
3
[Comparative analysis of clinical efficacies between induction chemotherapy and surgery combined with radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma].[诱导化疗与手术联合放疗或同步放化疗治疗晚期下咽癌的临床疗效对比分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Dec 7;53(12):918-924. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.12.009.
4
Severe late dysphagia after multimodal treatment of stage III/IV laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer.多模态治疗 III/IV 期喉和声门下咽部癌后严重晚期吞咽困难。
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 17;50(2):185-192. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyz158.
5
Chemoradiotherapy laryngeal preservation for advanced hypopharyngeal cancer.晚期下咽癌的喉保留化放疗
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug;38(8):521-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn073. Epub 2008 Aug 11.
6
Treatment/Comparative therapeutics: cancer of the larynx and hypopharynx.治疗/比较疗法:喉癌和下咽癌
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015 Jul;24(3):521-45. doi: 10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.013. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
7
[A retrospective study on combined modality therapy with or without surgery for advanced hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: an analysis of 119 cases].[晚期下咽鳞状细胞癌手术联合或不联合综合治疗的回顾性研究:119例分析]
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 May 7;53(5):352-358. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-0860.2018.05.005.
8
Larynx preservation: what is the best non-surgical strategy?喉保留:最佳非手术策略是什么?
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013 Nov;88(2):447-58. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2013.05.005. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
9
Laryngeal cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary guidelines.喉癌:英国国家多学科指南
J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S75-S82. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000487.
10
[Recent advances in the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinoma].[喉癌和下咽癌治疗的最新进展]
HNO. 2012 Jan;60(1):6-18. doi: 10.1007/s00106-011-2422-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Nomogram Prediction of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.局部晚期下咽鳞状细胞癌新辅助化疗联合帕博利珠单抗疗效的列线图预测
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251318255. doi: 10.1177/19160216251318255.
2
Upfront Surgery Versus Upfront Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy as Primary Modality in Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. upfront 手术与 upfront 同期放化疗作为下咽鳞癌的主要治疗方式:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2024 Jan-Dec;53:19160216241293633. doi: 10.1177/19160216241293633.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Laser surgery versus radiotherapy for T1a glottic carcinoma: a meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes.T1a期声门癌的激光手术与放射治疗:肿瘤学结局的荟萃分析
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Nov;137(11):1204-1209. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1353706. Epub 2017 Jul 24.
2
Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with conventional fractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily cisplatin plus weekly docetaxel for T2N0 glottic cancer.T2N0期声门癌采用常规分割放疗联合低剂量每日顺铂加每周多西他赛的同步放化疗。
Radiat Oncol. 2017 Feb 20;12(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13014-016-0741-4.
3
Survival Rates Using Individualized Bioselection Treatment Methods in Patients With Advanced Laryngeal Cancer.
Treatment options for resectable hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
可切除下咽鳞状细胞癌的治疗选择:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 29;17(11):e0277460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277460. eCollection 2022.
4
The Most Efficacious Induction Chemotherapy Regimen for Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis.局部晚期鼻咽癌最有效的诱导化疗方案:一项网状Meta分析
Front Oncol. 2021 Feb 25;11:626145. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.626145. eCollection 2021.
5
Tumour inflammation signature and expression of S100A12 and HLA class I improve survival in HPV-negative hypopharyngeal cancer.肿瘤炎症特征以及 S100A12 和 HLA Ⅰ类分子的表达可改善 HPV 阴性下咽癌患者的生存。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):1782. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80226-z.
6
[Correlation of serum PTTG1 expression level with clinicopathological features and prognosis in patients with laryngeal cancer].[喉癌患者血清PTTG1表达水平与临床病理特征及预后的相关性]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Dec;34(12):1128-1131. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2020.12.017.
晚期喉癌患者采用个体化生物选择治疗方法的生存率
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Apr 1;143(4):355-366. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.3669.
4
Transoral laser microsurgery versus radiotherapy for T1 glottic carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.经口激光显微手术与放射治疗治疗T1期声门癌的系统评价和Meta分析
Lasers Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):461-467. doi: 10.1007/s10103-016-2103-8. Epub 2016 Dec 13.
5
Evaluating organ preservation outcome as treatment endpoint for T1aN0 glottic cancer.评估器官保存结果作为T1aN0声门癌的治疗终点。
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1322-1327. doi: 10.1002/lary.26317. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
6
A comparison of overall survival for patients with T4 larynx cancer treated with surgical versus organ-preservation approaches: A National Cancer Data Base analysis.T4期喉癌患者手术治疗与器官保留治疗的总生存率比较:一项国家癌症数据库分析
Cancer. 2017 Feb 15;123(4):600-608. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30382. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
7
Comparison of survival between radiation therapy and trans-oral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer patients; a retrospective cohort study.早期声门癌患者放射治疗与经口激光显微手术生存率的比较;一项回顾性队列研究。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug 2;45(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0155-1.
8
Retrospective analysis of therapeutic effect and prognostic factors on early glottic carcinoma.早期声门癌治疗效果及预后因素的回顾性分析
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2016 Sep;15:167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
9
Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment.头颈部鳞状细胞癌:流行病学、诊断和治疗的最新进展
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017.
10
Combination treatment with antiEGFR monoclonal antibodies in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma : a meta-analysis.抗表皮生长因子受体单克隆抗体联合治疗晚期鼻咽癌的荟萃分析
J BUON. 2015 Nov-Dec;20(6):1510-7.