• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联邦电子健康记录网络数据完整性跟踪系统。

A federated EHR network data completeness tracking system.

机构信息

Laboratory of Computer Science, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Research Information Science and Computing, Partners HealthCare, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):637-645. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz014.

DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocz014
PMID:30925587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6586954/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to design, pilot, and evaluate a federated data completeness tracking system (CTX) for assessing completeness in research data extracted from electronic health record data across the Accessible Research Commons for Health (ARCH) Clinical Data Research Network.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The CTX applies a systems-based approach to design workflow and technology for assessing completeness across distributed electronic health record data repositories participating in a queryable, federated network. The CTX invokes 2 positive feedback loops that utilize open source tools (DQe-c and Vue) to integrate technology and human actors in a system geared for increasing capacity and taking action. A pilot implementation of the system involved 6 ARCH partner sites between January 2017 and May 2018.

RESULTS

The ARCH CTX has enabled the network to monitor and, if needed, adjust its data management processes to maintain complete datasets for secondary use. The system allows the network and its partner sites to profile data completeness both at the network and partner site levels. Interactive visualizations presenting the current state of completeness in the context of the entire network as well as changes in completeness across time were valued among the CTX user base.

DISCUSSION

Distributed clinical data networks are complex systems. Top-down approaches that solely rely on technology to report data completeness may be necessary but not sufficient for improving completeness (and quality) of data in large-scale clinical data networks. Improving and maintaining complete (high-quality) data in such complex environments entails sociotechnical systems that exploit technology and empower human actors to engage in the process of high-quality data curating.

CONCLUSIONS

The CTX has increased the network's capacity to rapidly identify data completeness issues and empowered ARCH partner sites to get involved in improving the completeness of respective data in their repositories.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在设计、试点和评估一个联邦数据完整性跟踪系统(CTX),用于评估从 Accessible Research Commons for Health(ARCH)临床数据研究网络中的电子健康记录数据中提取的研究数据的完整性。

材料和方法

CTX 采用基于系统的方法来设计工作流程和技术,以评估参与可查询联邦网络的分布式电子健康记录数据存储库中的数据完整性。CTX 调用了 2 个正反馈循环,利用开源工具(DQe-c 和 Vue)将技术和人工参与者集成到一个旨在提高能力和采取行动的系统中。该系统的试点实施涉及 2017 年 1 月至 2018 年 5 月期间的 6 个 ARCH 合作伙伴站点。

结果

ARCH CTX 使网络能够监控并在需要时调整其数据管理流程,以维护用于二次使用的完整数据集。该系统允许网络及其合作伙伴站点在网络和合作伙伴站点级别上对数据完整性进行分析。在 CTX 用户群中,交互式可视化呈现了整个网络范围内的完整性当前状态以及随时间变化的完整性变化,受到了重视。

讨论

分布式临床数据网络是复杂的系统。仅依靠技术报告数据完整性的自上而下方法可能是必要的,但对于提高大规模临床数据网络中数据的完整性(和质量)来说是不够的。在如此复杂的环境中提高和维护完整(高质量)的数据需要利用技术并赋予人工参与者权力来参与高质量数据管理的社会技术系统。

结论

CTX 提高了网络快速识别数据完整性问题的能力,并使 ARCH 合作伙伴站点能够参与提高其存储库中各自数据的完整性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/36d836f8f190/ocz014f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/f75c25b40500/ocz014f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/b990cb131b1e/ocz014f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/b425df339c92/ocz014f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/8d9ac2f4dd17/ocz014f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/36d836f8f190/ocz014f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/f75c25b40500/ocz014f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/b990cb131b1e/ocz014f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/b425df339c92/ocz014f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/8d9ac2f4dd17/ocz014f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/18e1/6586954/36d836f8f190/ocz014f5.jpg

相似文献

1
A federated EHR network data completeness tracking system.联邦电子健康记录网络数据完整性跟踪系统。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Jul 1;26(7):637-645. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz014.
2
Exploring completeness in clinical data research networks with DQe-c.利用 DQe-c 探索临床数据研究网络的完整性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jan 1;25(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx109.
3
A Generic Method and Implementation to Evaluate and Improve Data Quality in Distributed Research Networks.一种评估和提高分布式研究网络中数据质量的通用方法及实现
Methods Inf Med. 2019 Sep;58(2-03):86-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693685. Epub 2019 Sep 12.
4
Evaluation of immunization data completeness within a large community health care system exchanging data with a state immunization information system.在一个与州免疫信息系统交换数据的大型社区医疗系统内评估免疫数据的完整性。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015 May-Jun;21(3):288-95. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000045.
5
Balancing Accuracy and Privacy in Federated Queries of Clinical Data Repositories: Algorithm Development and Validation.联邦查询临床数据存储库中的准确性和隐私平衡:算法的开发和验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 3;22(11):e18735. doi: 10.2196/18735.
6
Differences in changes of data completeness after the implementation of an electronic medical record in three surgical departments of a German hospital-a longitudinal comparative document analysis.德国某医院三个外科部门实施电子病历后数据完整性变化的差异——一项纵向比较文献分析。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):258. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02667-0.
7
Implementing partnership-driven clinical federated electronic health record data sharing networks.实施由合作伙伴驱动的临床联合电子健康记录数据共享网络。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Sep;93:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 1.
8
Linkage of Indiana State Cancer Registry and Indiana Network for Patient Care Data.印第安纳州癌症登记处与印第安纳州患者护理数据网络的关联。
J Registry Manag. 2016 Winter;43(4):174-8.
9
Validation of Multi-State EHR-Based Network for Disease Surveillance (MENDS) Data and Implications for Improving Data Quality and Representativeness.基于多状态电子健康记录的疾病监测网络(MENDS)数据验证及其对提高数据质量和代表性的意义。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jun 13;21:E43. doi: 10.5888/pcd21.230409.
10
Assessing the Safety of Custom Web-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems in Electronic Health Records: A Case Study.评估基于 Web 的定制临床决策支持系统在电子健康记录中的安全性:案例研究。
Appl Clin Inform. 2019 Mar;10(2):237-246. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1683985. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Real-World Data Quality Framework for Oncology Time to Treatment Discontinuation Use Case: Implementation and Evaluation Study.肿瘤学治疗中断时间用例的真实世界数据质量框架:实施与评估研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Mar 6;12:e47744. doi: 10.2196/47744.
2
Standardizing nursing data extracted from electronic health records for integration into a statewide clinical data research network.标准化从电子健康记录中提取的护理数据,以整合到全州临床数据研究网络中。
Int J Med Inform. 2024 Mar;183:105325. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105325. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
3
A broadly applicable approach to enrich electronic-health-record cohorts by identifying patients with complete data: a multisite evaluation.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating Foundational Data Quality in the National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet®).评估国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORnet®)中的基础数据质量。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2018 Apr 13;6(1):3. doi: 10.5334/egems.199.
2
Exploring completeness in clinical data research networks with DQe-c.利用 DQe-c 探索临床数据研究网络的完整性。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 Jan 1;25(1):17-24. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx109.
3
A longitudinal analysis of data quality in a large pediatric data research network.大型儿科数据研究网络中数据质量的纵向分析。
一种通过识别具有完整数据的患者来丰富电子健康记录队列的广泛适用方法:多站点评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Nov 17;30(12):1985-1994. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad166.
4
Automating Electronic Health Record Data Quality Assessment.自动化电子健康记录数据质量评估。
J Med Syst. 2023 Feb 13;47(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s10916-022-01892-2.
5
The Future of Critical Care: Optimizing Technologies and a Learning Healthcare System to Potentiate a More Humanistic Approach to Critical Care.重症监护的未来:优化技术与建立学习型医疗体系,以强化更具人文关怀的重症监护方法。
Crit Care Explor. 2022 Mar 15;4(3):e0659. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000659. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Developing a systematic approach to assessing data quality in secondary use of clinical data based on intended use.基于预期用途,制定一种系统的方法来评估临床数据二次使用中的数据质量。
Learn Health Syst. 2021 May 3;6(1):e10264. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10264. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Towards a European health research and innovation cloud (HRIC).迈向欧洲健康研究与创新云(HRIC)。
Genome Med. 2020 Feb 19;12(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s13073-020-0713-z.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1072-1079. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx033.
4
A Harmonized Data Quality Assessment Terminology and Framework for the Secondary Use of Electronic Health Record Data.电子健康记录数据二次使用的统一数据质量评估术语和框架。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Sep 11;4(1):1244. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1244. eCollection 2016.
5
Applying a Participatory Design Approach to Define Objectives and Properties of a "Data Profiling" Tool for Electronic Health Data.应用参与式设计方法来定义电子健康数据“数据剖析”工具的目标和属性。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2016 Jul 20;2016:60-7. eCollection 2016.
6
Data interchange using i2b2.使用i2b2进行数据交换。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Sep;23(5):909-15. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv188. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
7
Systems science and systems thinking for public health: a systematic review of the field.公共卫生领域的系统科学与系统思维:该领域的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 30;5(12):e009002. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009002.
8
The FDA's sentinel initiative--A comprehensive approach to medical product surveillance.美国食品药品监督管理局的哨兵计划——一种全面的医疗产品监测方法。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 Mar;99(3):265-8. doi: 10.1002/cpt.320. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
9
Transparent reporting of data quality in distributed data networks.分布式数据网络中数据质量的透明报告。
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2015 Mar 23;3(1):1052. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1052. eCollection 2015.
10
The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking?系统思维在健康领域的应用:为何要运用系统思维?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2014 Aug 26;12:51. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-51.