• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卫生专业人员对使用常规收集的临床数据进行绩效反馈和个性化专业发展的态度。

Attitudes of health professionals to using routinely collected clinical data for performance feedback and personalised professional development.

机构信息

Research in Implementation Science and eHealth Group (RISe), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

The Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW.

出版信息

Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210 Suppl 6:S17-S21. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50022.

DOI:10.5694/mja2.50022
PMID:30927464
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To learn the attitudes of health professionals, health informaticians and information communication technology professionals to using data in electronic health records (eHRs) for performance feedback and professional development.

DESIGN

Qualitative research in a co-design framework. Health professionals' perceptions of the accessibility of data in eHRs, and barriers to and enablers of using these data in performance feedback and professional development were explored in co-design workshops. Audio recordings of the workshops were transcribed, de-identified, and thematically analysed.

SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A total of nine co-design workshops were held in two major public hospitals in Sydney: three for nursing staff (ten participants), three for doctors (15 participants), and one each for information communication technology professionals (six participants), health informaticians (four participants), and allied health professionals (13 participants).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Key themes related to attitudes of participants to the secondary use of eHR data for improving health care practice.

RESULTS

Six themes emerged from the discussions in the workshops: enthusiasm for feeding back clinical data; formative rather than punitive use; peer comparison, benchmarking, and collaborative learning; data access and use; capturing complex clinical narratives; and system design challenges. Barriers to secondary use of eHR data included access to information, measuring performance on the basis of eHR data, and technical questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings will inform the development of programs designed to utilise routinely collected eHR data for performance feedback and professional development.

摘要

目的

了解卫生专业人员、卫生信息学专业人员和信息通信技术专业人员对使用电子健康记录 (eHR) 中的数据进行绩效反馈和专业发展的态度。

设计

在共同设计框架内进行定性研究。在共同设计研讨会上探讨了卫生专业人员对 eHR 中数据可及性的看法,以及在绩效反馈和专业发展中使用这些数据的障碍和促成因素。研讨会的音频记录被转录、去识别,并进行主题分析。

地点、参与者:共在悉尼的两家主要公立医院举行了九次共同设计研讨会:护理人员三次(十名参与者),医生三次(十五名参与者),信息通信技术专业人员一次(六名参与者),卫生信息学专业人员一次(四名参与者),以及联合卫生专业人员一次(十三名参与者)。

主要结果测量

与参与者对 eHR 数据的二次使用以改善医疗实践的态度相关的主要主题。

结果

研讨会讨论中出现了六个主题:对反馈临床数据的热情;形成性而非惩罚性使用;同行比较、基准测试和协作学习;数据访问和使用;捕捉复杂的临床叙述;以及系统设计挑战。eHR 数据二次使用的障碍包括信息获取、基于 eHR 数据衡量绩效以及技术问题。

结论

我们的研究结果将为旨在利用常规收集的 eHR 数据进行绩效反馈和专业发展的计划的制定提供信息。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of health professionals to using routinely collected clinical data for performance feedback and personalised professional development.卫生专业人员对使用常规收集的临床数据进行绩效反馈和个性化专业发展的态度。
Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210 Suppl 6:S17-S21. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50022.
2
Thought Leader Perspectives on the Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers for Routinely Collected Electronic Health Data to Support Professional Development: Qualitative Study.关于常规电子健康数据支持专业发展的益处、障碍和促成因素的思想领袖观点:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 16;25:e40685. doi: 10.2196/40685.
3
Faculty development initiatives designed to promote leadership in medical education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 19.旨在促进医学教育领导力的教师发展计划。BEME 系统评价:BEME 指南第 19 号。
Med Teach. 2012;34(6):483-503. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.680937.
4
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Pre-implementation investigation of the readiness of allied health professionals to adopt electronic health records.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;204:47-53.
6
Tribes and tribulations: interdisciplinary eHealth in providing services for people with a traumatic brain injury (TBI).部落与磨难:跨学科电子健康为创伤性脑损伤患者提供服务的情况
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Nov 21;17(1):757. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2721-2.
7
Health professionals' perceptions of electronic health records system: a mixed method study in Ghana.健康专业人员对电子健康记录系统的看法:加纳的一项混合方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02672-3.
8
Health professionals' views on health literacy issues for culturally and linguistically diverse women in maternity care: barriers, enablers and the need for an integrated approach.医疗保健专业人员对孕产护理中文化和语言背景多样的女性的健康素养问题的看法:障碍、促进因素以及采取综合方法的必要性。
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Feb;42(1):10-20. doi: 10.1071/AH17067.
9
Mental Health Care Professionals' Appraisal of Patients' Use of Web-Based Access to Their Electronic Health Record: Qualitative Study.精神健康护理专业人员对患者使用其电子健康记录的网络访问的评估:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 27;23(8):e28045. doi: 10.2196/28045.
10
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review of the use and challenges of electronic health records in physiotherapy practice.物理治疗实践中电子健康记录的使用及挑战的系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jul 30;15(7):e097649. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097649.
2
The role of medical regulations and medical regulators in fostering the use of eHealth data for strengthened continuing professional development (CPD): a document analysis with key informants' interviews.医学法规及医学监管机构在促进利用电子健康数据以加强继续职业发展(CPD)方面的作用:一项结合关键信息人士访谈的文件分析
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):871. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-07443-w.
3
Technology-Enabled Workplace Learning Through Rethinking Electronic Health Records to Support Performance Feedback: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
通过重新思考电子健康记录以支持绩效反馈实现技术赋能的职场学习:一项混合方法研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 23;14:e66824. doi: 10.2196/66824.
4
Integrating eHealth data analytics into Continuing Professional Development for medical practitioners: an ecosystemic perspective.将电子健康数据分析整合到医生的继续职业发展中:一种生态系统视角。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Mar 28;12:1553479. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1553479. eCollection 2025.
5
Community perspectives on the use of electronic health data to support reflective practice by health professionals.社区视角下的电子健康数据在卫生专业人员反思性实践中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 12;24(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02626-9.
6
A Taxonomy for Health Information Systems.健康信息系统分类法。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e47682. doi: 10.2196/47682.
7
Feasibility of Microlearning for Improving the Self-Efficacy of Cancer Patients Managing Side Effects of Chemotherapy.微学习提高癌症患者化疗副作用管理自我效能的可行性研究
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Oct;38(5):1697-1709. doi: 10.1007/s13187-023-02324-6. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
8
Thought Leader Perspectives on the Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers for Routinely Collected Electronic Health Data to Support Professional Development: Qualitative Study.关于常规电子健康数据支持专业发展的益处、障碍和促成因素的思想领袖观点:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 16;25:e40685. doi: 10.2196/40685.
9
Electronic Health Records That Support Health Professional Reflective Practice: a Missed Opportunity in Digital Health.支持医疗专业人员反思性实践的电子健康记录:数字健康领域错失的机遇。
J Healthc Inform Res. 2023 Jan 20;6(4):375-384. doi: 10.1007/s41666-022-00123-0. eCollection 2022 Dec.
10
An exploration into physician and surgeon data sensemaking: a qualitative systematic review using thematic synthesis.探索医师和外科医生的数据理解:使用主题综合的定性系统评价。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Sep 28;22(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-01997-1.