Information Services Division, Edinburgh, UK.
Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e024563. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024563.
It has been proposed that part of the explanation for higher mortality in Scotland compared with England and Wales, and Glasgow compared with other UK cities, relates to greater ethnic diversity in England and Wales. We sought to assess the extent to which this excess was attenuated by adjusting for ethnicity. We additionally explored the role of country of birth in any observed differences.
Scotland and England and Wales; Glasgow and Manchester.
We used the Scottish Longitudinal Study and the Office for National Statistics Longitudinal Study of England and Wales (2001-2010). Participants (362 491 in total) were aged 35-74 years at baseline.
Risk of all-cause mortality between 35 and 74 years old in Scotland and England and Wales, and in Glasgow and Manchester, adjusting for age, gender, socioeconomic position (SEP), ethnicity and country of birth.
18% of the Manchester sample was non-White compared with 3% in Glasgow (England and Wales: 10.4%; Scotland: 1.2%). The mortality incidence rate ratio was 1.33 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.56) in Glasgow compared with Manchester. This reduced to 1.25 (1.07 to 1.47) adjusting for SEP, and to 1.20 (1.02 to 1.42) adjusting for ethnicity and country of birth. For Scotland versus England and Wales, the corresponding figures were 18% higher mortality, reducing to 10%, and then 7%. Non-Whites born outside the UK had lower mortality. In the Scottish samples only, non-Whites born in the UK had significantly higher mortality than Whites born in the UK.
The research supports the hypothesis that ethnic diversity and migration from outside UK play a role in explaining Scottish excess mortality. In Glasgow especially, however, a large excess remains: thus, previously articulated policy implications (addressing poverty, vulnerability and inequality) still apply.
有人提出,苏格兰的死亡率高于英格兰和威尔士,格拉斯哥的死亡率高于英国其他城市,部分原因是英格兰和威尔士的种族多样性更大。我们试图通过调整种族因素来评估这种差异的程度。我们还探讨了出生地在任何观察到的差异中的作用。
苏格兰和英格兰及威尔士;格拉斯哥和曼彻斯特。
我们使用了苏格兰纵向研究和英国国家统计局英格兰和威尔士纵向研究(2001-2010 年)。参与者(总计 362491 人)在基线时年龄为 35-74 岁。
在苏格兰和英格兰及威尔士以及在格拉斯哥和曼彻斯特,35-74 岁之间全因死亡率的风险,调整年龄、性别、社会经济地位(SEP)、种族和出生地。
曼彻斯特样本中有 18%是非白人,而格拉斯哥(英格兰和威尔士:10.4%;苏格兰:1.2%)的这一比例为 3%。格拉斯哥与曼彻斯特相比,死亡率发病率比为 1.33(95%CI 1.13-1.56)。这一比例在调整 SEP 后降至 1.25(1.07-1.47),在调整种族和出生地后降至 1.20(1.02-1.42)。对于苏格兰与英格兰和威尔士相比,相应的数字是死亡率高出 18%,降至 10%,然后降至 7%。非英国出生的非白人死亡率较低。在苏格兰样本中,仅非英国出生的非白人死亡率明显高于英国出生的白人。
研究结果支持这样一种假设,即种族多样性和来自英国以外的移民在解释苏格兰超额死亡率方面发挥了作用。然而,在格拉斯哥尤其如此,仍然存在很大的超额死亡率:因此,之前提出的政策含义(解决贫困、脆弱性和不平等问题)仍然适用。