Orthopedic Biotechnology Laboratory, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Unit of Clinical Epidemiology, IRCCS Orthopedic Institute Galeazzi, Milan, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020 May;28(5):1665-1672. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05670-5. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
To evaluate the knowledge and awareness of Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) among members of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA).
A questionnaire was developed that explored the following areas: (i) respondents' attitudes to EBM; (ii) their motivation to implement EBM in daily practice; (iii) their educational background, knowledge and skills related to accessing and interpreting information; (iv) their level of attention to, and use of, scientific literature; (v) access to and availability of evidence; (vi) perceived barriers in using EBM in clinical practice. The resulting data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, and the correlation between age, educational background and country was further investigated.
Two-hundred and eighty-eight ESSKA members (11% of the total population) compiled the questionnaire. The participants covered all the five continents and an expected prevalence of European professionals (77%) was observed. The vast majority of participants were medical doctors (91%), mainly specialized in knee surgery with minimal involvement in research. 97% of the participants declared having some knowledge of EBM, acquired mainly during their professional education, with some geographical differences. The youngest clinicians and those from Eastern Europe reported the greatest difficulty in using EBM in daily practice. The application of EBM in clinical practice is positively affected by the time dedicated to research and negatively correlates with the time dedicated to patient care.
The results of this survey highlight the need for further investigation into the main reasons behind the limited diffusion of the EBM approach, despite the medical community's knowledge and interest in the concept. A wider application of EMB would upgrade clinical practice, linking medical knowledge and scientific evidence to patients' needs which would result of benefit to patients, but also more in general to the health system.
评估欧洲运动创伤学、膝关节外科和关节镜学会(ESSKA)成员对循证医学(EBM)的知识和认识。
设计了一份问卷,探讨以下领域:(i)受访者对 EBM 的态度;(ii)他们在日常实践中实施 EBM 的动机;(iii)他们与获取和解释信息相关的教育背景、知识和技能;(iv)他们对科学文献的关注度和使用程度;(v)获取和提供证据的情况;(vi)在临床实践中使用 EBM 时遇到的障碍。使用描述性统计分析所得数据,并进一步调查年龄、教育背景和国家之间的相关性。
288 名 ESSKA 成员(占总人数的 11%)填写了问卷。参与者覆盖了所有五个大洲,观察到了预期的欧洲专业人员的流行率(77%)。绝大多数参与者是医生(91%),主要专门从事膝关节外科手术,很少参与研究。97%的参与者表示对 EBM 有一定的了解,主要是在专业教育中获得的,但存在一些地理差异。最年轻的临床医生和来自东欧的临床医生报告在日常实践中使用 EBM 最困难。EBM 在临床实践中的应用受到用于研究的时间的积极影响,并与用于患者护理的时间呈负相关。
这项调查的结果强调了需要进一步调查限制 EBM 方法传播的主要原因,尽管医学界对该概念有知识和兴趣。更广泛地应用 EMB 将提升临床实践,将医学知识和科学证据与患者的需求联系起来,这将使患者受益,更普遍地使卫生系统受益。