Linhares Filho T A, Arcanjo F P N, Zanin L H, Portela H A, Braga J M, da Luz Pereira V
Department of Master of Science in Health Sciences,Federal University of Ceará,Sobral,Brazil.
Department of Phonoaudiology and Physiotherapy,Hospital Regional Norte,Sobral,Brazil.
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 Apr;133(4):329-332. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000471. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
To evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the modified Evans blue dye test compared to the fibre-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing to detect aspiration in tracheostomised patients.
This observational accuracy study included 17 patients hospitalised for respiratory complications, subjected to prolonged intubation, and for this reason, tracheostomised.
Mean patient age was 60.2 ± 21.0 years. Aspiration was identified in 10 patients when assessed by fibre-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing; of these, 1 had aspiration when evaluated by modified Evans blue dye test. The dye test had a sensitivity of 10.0 per cent and specificity of 100.0 per cent for detecting aspiration. Fibre-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing revealed no statistically significant associations between aspiration presence and: speech and language therapy duration, intubation time, or tracheostomy plus mechanical ventilation duration.
The modified Evans blue dye test is simple and inexpensive, and does not require prior knowledge in endoscopy; it may be used as an initial screening test in all tracheostomised patients for evaluating aspiration. However, fibre-optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing should be used for a more comprehensive diagnosis of tracheostomy patients, especially for those at high risk for aspiration.
评估改良伊文思蓝染料试验与纤维光学内镜吞咽评估相比,在检测气管切开患者误吸方面的敏感性和特异性。
这项观察性准确性研究纳入了17例因呼吸并发症住院、接受长时间插管并因此进行气管切开的患者。
患者平均年龄为60.2±21.0岁。通过纤维光学内镜吞咽评估发现10例患者有误吸;其中,经改良伊文思蓝染料试验评估,1例有误吸。染料试验检测误吸的敏感性为10.0%,特异性为100.0%。纤维光学内镜吞咽评估显示,误吸的存在与言语和语言治疗持续时间、插管时间或气管切开加机械通气持续时间之间无统计学显著关联。
改良伊文思蓝染料试验简单且成本低廉,不需要内镜检查的先验知识;它可作为所有气管切开患者评估误吸的初步筛查试验。然而,纤维光学内镜吞咽评估应用于气管切开患者的更全面诊断,尤其是对于误吸高危患者。