• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根系结构决定了对干旱响应的可塑性。

Root architecture governs plasticity in response to drought.

作者信息

Fry Ellen L, Evans Amy L, Sturrock Craig J, Bullock James M, Bardgett Richard D

机构信息

1School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Michael Smith Building, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT UK.

2School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD UK.

出版信息

Plant Soil. 2018;433(1):189-200. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3824-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.

DOI:10.1007/s11104-018-3824-1
PMID:30930495
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6406839/
Abstract

AIMS

Root characteristics are important for predicting plant and ecosystem responses to resource scarcity. Simple, categorical traits for roots could be broadly applied to ecosystem function and restoration experiments, but they need to be evaluated for their role and behaviour under various stresses, including water limitation. We hypothesised that more complex root architectures allow more plastic responses to limited water than do tap roots.

METHODS

We carried out two greenhouse experiments: one with a range of grassland plant species; the other with only species of Asteraceae to test the responsiveness of root architectural classes to location of limited water in the soil column. Using trait screening techniques and X-ray tomography, we measured the plasticity of the roots in response to water location.

RESULTS

Plasticity of root biomass was lowest in tap rooted species, while fibrous and rhizomatous roots allocated biomass preferentially to where the soil was wettest. X-ray tomography indicated that root morphology was least plastic in rhizomatous species.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide a starting point to effective categorisation of plants in terms of rooting architecture that could aid in understanding drought tolerance of grassland species. They also demonstrate the utility of X-ray tomography in root analyses.

摘要

目的

根系特征对于预测植物和生态系统对资源稀缺的响应至关重要。简单的根系分类性状可广泛应用于生态系统功能和恢复实验,但需要评估它们在包括水分限制在内的各种胁迫下的作用和行为。我们假设,与直根系相比,更复杂的根系结构对有限水分具有更强的可塑性响应。

方法

我们进行了两项温室实验:一项涉及一系列草原植物物种;另一项仅使用菊科物种,以测试根系结构类型对土壤柱中有限水分位置的响应。使用性状筛选技术和X射线断层扫描,我们测量了根系对水分位置的可塑性。

结果

直根系物种的根生物量可塑性最低,而须根系和根茎型根系则优先将生物量分配到土壤最湿润的地方。X射线断层扫描表明,根茎型物种的根系形态可塑性最小。

结论

我们的结果为根据根系结构对植物进行有效分类提供了一个起点,这有助于理解草原物种的耐旱性。它们还证明了X射线断层扫描在根系分析中的实用性。

相似文献

1
Root architecture governs plasticity in response to drought.根系结构决定了对干旱响应的可塑性。
Plant Soil. 2018;433(1):189-200. doi: 10.1007/s11104-018-3824-1. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
2
Drought Eliminates the Difference in Root Trait Plasticity and Mycorrhizal Responsiveness of Two Semiarid Grassland Species with Contrasting Root System.干旱消除了根系系统截然不同的两种半干旱草原物种在根系性状可塑性和菌根响应方面的差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 17;24(12):10262. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210262.
3
Soil multifunctionality and drought resistance are determined by plant structural traits in restoring grassland.土壤多功能性和抗旱性取决于草原恢复中植物结构特征。
Ecology. 2018 Oct;99(10):2260-2271. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2437. Epub 2018 Aug 20.
4
Progressive drought alters architectural and anatomical traits of rice roots.渐进性干旱会改变水稻根系的形态结构和解剖学特征。
Rice (N Y). 2018 Dec 4;11(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12284-018-0252-z.
5
Do shallow soil, low water availability, or their combination increase the competition between grasses with different root systems in karst soil?浅薄的土壤、低水分可利用性或它们的组合是否会加剧喀斯特土壤中具有不同根系的草本植物之间的竞争?
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2017 Apr;24(11):10640-10651. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8675-4. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
6
Plasticity in response to plant-plant interactions and water availability.对植物-植物相互作用和水分可利用性的响应中的可塑性。
Ecology. 2021 Jun;102(6):e03361. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3361. Epub 2021 May 20.
7
Rooting depth as a key woody functional trait in savannas.扎根深度是稀树草原中一个关键的木本功能性状。
New Phytol. 2020 Sep;227(5):1350-1361. doi: 10.1111/nph.16613. Epub 2020 May 12.
8
Belowground carbon allocation, root trait plasticity, and productivity during drought and warming in a pasture grass.在干旱和升温条件下,一种牧草的地下碳分配、根系性状可塑性和生产力。
J Exp Bot. 2023 Mar 28;74(6):2127-2145. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad021.
9
Maize root responses to drought stress depend on root class and axial position.玉米根系对干旱胁迫的响应取决于根系类别和轴向位置。
J Plant Res. 2022 Jan;135(1):105-120. doi: 10.1007/s10265-021-01348-7. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
10
Plasticity and the role of mass-scaling in allocation, morphology, and anatomical trait responses to above- and belowground resource limitation in cultivated sunflower ( L.).可塑性以及质量缩放在栽培向日葵(向日葵属)对地上和地下资源限制的分配、形态和解剖特征响应中的作用。
Plant Direct. 2020 Oct 21;4(10):e00274. doi: 10.1002/pld3.274. eCollection 2020 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Maize nodal root growth maintenance during water deficit: metabolic acclimation and the role of increased solute deposition in osmotic adjustment.水分亏缺期间玉米节根生长的维持:代谢适应及溶质沉积增加在渗透调节中的作用
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Jun 9;16:1566453. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1566453. eCollection 2025.
2
Beneficial Effects of ACC Deaminase-Producing Rhizobacteria on the Drought Stress Resistance of L.产ACC脱氨酶的根际细菌对L.抗旱性的有益影响
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 1;14(7):1084. doi: 10.3390/plants14071084.
3
Plant Adaptation and Soil Shear Strength: Unraveling the Drought Legacy in .

本文引用的文献

1
Root architectural tradeoffs for water and phosphorus acquisition.根系结构在水分和磷素获取方面的权衡
Funct Plant Biol. 2005 Sep;32(8):737-748. doi: 10.1071/FP05043.
2
Rightsizing root phenotypes for drought resistance.为抗旱性调整根系表型。
J Exp Bot. 2018 Jun 6;69(13):3279-3292. doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery048.
3
Circular linkages between soil biodiversity, fertility and plant productivity are limited to topsoil at the continental scale.土壤生物多样性、肥力和植物生产力之间的循环联系仅限于大陆尺度的表土。
植物适应性与土壤抗剪强度:解读干旱遗留问题
Plants (Basel). 2025 Jan 10;14(2):179. doi: 10.3390/plants14020179.
4
Role of Carrot ( L.) Storage Roots in Drought Stress Adaptation: Hormonal Regulation and Metabolite Accumulation.胡萝卜(L.)贮藏根在干旱胁迫适应中的作用:激素调节与代谢物积累
Metabolites. 2025 Jan 16;15(1):56. doi: 10.3390/metabo15010056.
5
Dissecting negative effects of two root-associated bacteria on the growth of an invasive weed.解析两种根际相关细菌对入侵杂草生长的负面影响。
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2024 Sep 14;100(10). doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiae116.
6
Is urbanization a driver of aboveground biomass allocation in a widespread tropical shrub, Turnera subulata (Turneroideae - Passifloraceae)?城市化是否是广泛分布的热带灌木 Turnera subulata(Turneroideae- Passifloraceae)地上生物量分配的驱动因素?
J Plant Res. 2024 Sep;137(5):879-892. doi: 10.1007/s10265-024-01560-1. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
7
Drought intensity and duration effects on morphological root traits vary across trait type and plant functional groups: a meta-analysis.干旱强度和持续时间对形态学根系特征的影响因性状类型和植物功能群而异:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Jul 4;24(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02275-6.
8
Young temperate tree species show different fine root acclimation capacity to growing season water availability.温带幼龄树种对生长季水分供应表现出不同的细根适应能力。
Plant Soil. 2024;496(1-2):485-504. doi: 10.1007/s11104-023-06377-w. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
9
Drought Eliminates the Difference in Root Trait Plasticity and Mycorrhizal Responsiveness of Two Semiarid Grassland Species with Contrasting Root System.干旱消除了根系系统截然不同的两种半干旱草原物种在根系性状可塑性和菌根响应方面的差异。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 17;24(12):10262. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210262.
10
Changes in mass allocation play a more prominent role than morphology in resource acquisition of the rhizomatous Leymus chinensis under drought stress.在干旱胁迫下,根茎状羊草的物质分配变化比形态变化在资源获取中发挥更重要的作用。
Ann Bot. 2023 Oct 4;132(1):121-132. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcad073.
New Phytol. 2017 Aug;215(3):1186-1196. doi: 10.1111/nph.14634. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
4
A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging.资源觅食中规模与精度之间的权衡。
Oecologia. 1991 Sep;87(4):532-538. doi: 10.1007/BF00320417.
5
Toward an Integrated Root Ideotype for Irrigated Systems.面向灌溉系统的综合根系理想型。
Trends Plant Sci. 2017 May;22(5):433-443. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
6
Below-ground frontiers in trait-based plant ecology.基于性状的植物生态学中的地下前沿
New Phytol. 2017 Mar;213(4):1597-1603. doi: 10.1111/nph.14247. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
7
Plant community controls on short-term ecosystem nitrogen retention.植物群落对短期生态系统氮保留的控制作用
New Phytol. 2016 May;210(3):861-74. doi: 10.1111/nph.13832. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
8
X-ray computed tomography uncovers root-root interactions: quantifying spatial relationships between interacting root systems in three dimensions.X射线计算机断层扫描揭示根系与根系之间的相互作用:量化三维空间中相互作用根系系统之间的空间关系。
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 29;6:274. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00274. eCollection 2015.
9
Integrated plant phenotypic responses to contrasting above- and below-ground resources: key roles of specific leaf area and root mass fraction.植物对地上和地下资源差异的综合表型响应:比叶面积和根质量分数的关键作用。
New Phytol. 2015 Jun;206(4):1247-60. doi: 10.1111/nph.13352. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
10
Going underground: root traits as drivers of ecosystem processes.遁入地下:根系特性作为生态系统过程的驱动因素。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Dec;29(12):692-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.10.006. Epub 2014 Nov 11.