Tumin Dmitry, Tobias Joseph Drew
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's Hospital and The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Saudi J Anaesth. 2019 Apr;13(Suppl 1):S52-S58. doi: 10.4103/sja.SJA_544_18.
The peer review process provides a foundation for the credibility of scientific findings in medicine. The following article discusses the history of peer review in scientific and medical journals, the process for the selection of peer reviewers, and how journal editors arrive at a decision on submitted manuscripts. To aid authors who are invited to revise their manuscripts for further consideration, we outline steps for considering reviewer comments and provide suggestions for organizing the author's response to reviewers. We also examine ethical issues in peer review and provide recommendations for authors interested in becoming peer reviewers themselves.
同行评审过程为医学科学研究结果的可信度奠定了基础。以下文章讨论了科学和医学期刊同行评审的历史、同行评审人员的选择过程，以及期刊编辑如何对提交的稿件做出决定。为了帮助受邀修改稿件以供进一步审议的作者，我们概述了考虑审稿人意见的步骤，并提供了组织作者对审稿人回复的建议。我们还探讨了同行评审中的伦理问题，并为有兴趣成为同行评审人员的作者提供建议。
