Nivbrant B, Kärrholm J, Röhrl S, Hassander H, Wesslén B
Department of Orthopedics, NUS, University Hospital of Northern Sweden, Umeå.
Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Dec;72(6):572-84. doi: 10.1080/000164701317268987.
Bone cement with reduced amount of monomer and low curing temperature may improve implant fixation due to reduced toxicity. We analyzed the mechanical, chemical and thermal properties of such a cement (Cemex Rx) using Palacos R as control. The in vivo performance of the 2 cements was also evaluated in a prospective randomized study of 47 hips, where either of the cement types was used to fixate Lubinus SP2 prostheses with the stem made of titanium alloy. Cemex Rx had a reduced tensile strength, probably because this cement was manually mixed, as recommended by the manufacturer. A standardized labor tory test showed lower curing temperature for Cemex, but measurements at 37 degrees and with prechilled Palacos R and Cemex Rx, as in clinical work, showed no difference. In the clinical study radiostereometric measurements of cup and stem migration showed similar values in the 2 groups up to 5 years after the operation. The cement mantle was stable in both groups, but the stems migrated similarly inside the cement mantle regardless of the type of cement used. Proximal wear was low (0.04-0.05 mm/year) and tended to be lower in the Cemex group (p = 0.02). Aluminum and vanadium levels in serum increased 5 years after the operation, but no difference was noted between the 2 groups. Collagen markers (PICP, ICTP) showed similar increases in bone turnover 6 weeks and 6 months after operation in both groups.
单体含量降低且固化温度较低的骨水泥可能因毒性降低而改善植入物固定效果。我们以Palacos R为对照,分析了此类骨水泥(Cemex Rx)的力学、化学和热性能。在一项对47例髋关节的前瞻性随机研究中,还评估了这两种骨水泥的体内性能,在该研究中,使用这两种骨水泥中的任何一种来固定由钛合金制成柄部的Lubinus SP2假体。Cemex Rx的拉伸强度较低,可能是因为这种骨水泥是按照制造商的建议手动混合的。一项标准化实验室测试显示Cemex的固化温度较低,但在37摄氏度下以及像临床工作中那样对预冷的Palacos R和Cemex Rx进行测量时,未发现差异。在临床研究中,对髋臼杯和柄部移位的放射立体测量显示,术后5年内两组的值相似。两组的骨水泥壳均稳定,但无论使用何种骨水泥,柄部在骨水泥壳内的移位情况相似。近端磨损较低(0.04 - 0.05毫米/年),且Cemex组的磨损倾向更低(p = 0.02)。术后5年血清中的铝和钒水平升高,但两组之间未发现差异。两组术后6周和6个月时,胶原蛋白标志物(PICP、ICTP)显示骨转换的增加情况相似。