Division of Crop Protection, ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, 793103, India.
Division of Crop Protection, ICAR Research Complex for North Eastern Hill Region, Umiam, Meghalaya, 793103, India.
Environ Pollut. 2019 Jun;249:598-609. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
Honey bees and brassica plants are co-evolved and due to the peculiar floral characters, mustard (Brassica juncea) plants are strongly dependent on bees for survival. Mustard is one of the most important oilseeds across the world. Insect pests often cause huge economic losses in mustard and their management, especially during flowering stage is very crucial to achieve maximum yield, although this step often displays undesirable effects on the foraging bees. Effects of synthetic pesticides on bees are widely documented and extensively reported. Although the numbers of pesticides/bio-pesticides are widely used in oilseed brassica's, the reports are mostly focused on neonicotinoids. To identify the bee-friendly pesticides, the study was conducted in two tier approach (i.e. laboratory and field conditions) and determined the potential impacts of widely used biopesticides on Asiatic honey bees, Apis cerana Fabricius. The LC, LC and LD were determined for four destructive pests and honey bees, to assess their risk against honey bees. In laboratory studies, LC of pesticides to the honey bee was in the order of Beauveria bassiana 1.5L (4.79%) > Bacillus thuriengiensis 8SP (1.67%) > Azadirachtin 0.03 EC (1.64%) > Annonin 1 EC (1.22%) > Spinosad 2.5 SC (0.006%) > Imidacloprid 17.8SL (0.005%). Based on three essential risk assessment criteria's (viz., Selectivity ratio, Probit substitution method (%) and Hazard Ratio/Risk quotient); the Azadirachtin, Anonnin, B. bassiana and Bt var. k were found selective, and slightly to moderately toxic to the honeybee; whereas Spinosad and Imidacloprid was found non-selective and dangerous to the bees. Entomopathogenic fungus, Nomuraea rileyi was found absolutely harmless to the bees. In field studies, the relative abundance, foraging rate and foraging speed of honey bees was significantly affected in different treatments even up to 2 days of spraying. Among bio-pesticides, deterrence/repellent effect was, however, strongly observed in Annonin and Spinosad treatments. Significantly higher yield was obtained in Azadirachtin (1.43 t/ha) and Anonin (1.22 t/ha) treated plots. Except Spinosad, remaining bio-pesticides were found selective to the foraging bees, nevertheless considering the efficiency in pest control and higher yield, Azadirachtin 0.03 EC and Annonin 1 EC could be efficiently used in Integrated Pest cum Pollinator Management Programme (IPPM) in oilseed brassica's. The spraying of Spinosad may be discouraged, especially at flowering time.
蜜蜂和十字花科植物是共同进化的,由于特殊的花部特征,芥菜(Brassica juncea)植物强烈依赖蜜蜂才能生存。芥菜是世界上最重要的油料作物之一。昆虫害虫经常在芥菜中造成巨大的经济损失,它们的管理,特别是在开花期,对获得最大产量至关重要,尽管这一步骤通常会对觅食的蜜蜂产生不良影响。合成农药对蜜蜂的影响已被广泛记录和广泛报道。尽管在油料作物芥菜中广泛使用了多种农药/生物农药,但这些报告大多集中在新烟碱类农药上。为了确定对蜜蜂友好的农药,本研究采用了两层次方法(即实验室和田间条件),并确定了广泛使用的生物农药对亚洲蜜蜂(Apis cerana Fabricius)的潜在影响。为了评估其对蜜蜂的风险,测定了四种破坏性害虫和蜜蜂对四种生物农药的 LC、LC 和 LD。在实验室研究中,对蜜蜂的农药 LC 按以下顺序排列:球孢白僵菌 1.5L(4.79%)>苏云金芽孢杆菌 8SP(1.67%)>印楝素 0.03EC(1.64%)>安诺宁 1EC(1.22%)>多杀菌素 2.5SC(0.006%)>吡虫啉 17.8SL(0.005%)。根据三个基本风险评估标准(即选择性比、概率替换法(%)和危害比/风险商);发现印楝素、安诺宁、白僵菌和 Bt 变种 k 对蜜蜂具有选择性,且对蜜蜂有轻微至中度毒性;而多杀菌素和吡虫啉则对蜜蜂无选择性且危险。昆虫病原真菌诺氏拟青霉对蜜蜂绝对无害。在田间研究中,即使在喷洒后 2 天,不同处理对蜜蜂的相对丰度、觅食率和觅食速度仍有显著影响。在生物农药中,安诺宁和多杀菌素处理对蜜蜂表现出强烈的驱避/驱避作用。在使用印楝素(1.43t/ha)和安诺宁(1.22t/ha)处理的地块中,产量显著提高。除多杀菌素外,其余生物农药对觅食蜜蜂均具有选择性,但考虑到防治害虫的效率和更高的产量,印楝素 0.03EC 和安诺宁 1EC 可有效地用于油料作物的综合病虫害管理计划(IPPM)。多杀菌素的喷洒可能会受到抑制,尤其是在开花期。