• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

植物源生物农药对蜜蜂(膜翅目,蜜蜂总科)是否安全?

Are Botanical Biopesticides Safe for Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)?

作者信息

Catania Roberto, Lima Maria Augusta Pereira, Potrich Michele, Sgolastra Fabio, Zappalà Lucia, Mazzeo Gaetana

机构信息

Dipartimento di Agricoltura, Alimentazione e Ambiente, Università degli Studi di Catania, 95123 Catania, Italy.

Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa 36570-900, Brazil.

出版信息

Insects. 2023 Mar 2;14(3):247. doi: 10.3390/insects14030247.

DOI:10.3390/insects14030247
PMID:36975932
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10053700/
Abstract

The recent global decline in insect populations is of particular concern for pollinators. Wild and managed bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea) are of primary environmental and economic importance because of their role in pollinating cultivated and wild plants, and synthetic pesticides are among the major factors contributing to their decline. Botanical biopesticides may be a viable alternative to synthetic pesticides in plant defence due to their high selectivity and short environmental persistence. In recent years, scientific progress has been made to improve the development and effectiveness of these products. However, knowledge regarding their adverse effects on the environment and non-target species is still scarce, especially when compared to that of synthetic products. Here, we summarize the studies concerning the toxicity of botanical biopesticides on the different groups of social and solitary bees. We highlight the lethal and sublethal effects of these products on bees, the lack of a uniform protocol to assess the risks of biopesticides on pollinators, and the scarcity of studies on specific groups of bees, such as the large and diverse group of solitary bees. Results show that botanical biopesticides cause lethal effects and a large number of sublethal effects on bees. However, the toxicity is limited when comparing the effects of these compounds with those of synthetic compounds.

摘要

近期全球昆虫数量的下降尤其引起了传粉者方面的关注。野生和人工养殖的蜜蜂(膜翅目,蜜蜂总科)因其在为栽培植物和野生植物授粉方面的作用而具有重要的环境和经济意义,而合成农药是导致其数量下降的主要因素之一。植物源生物农药因其高选择性和较短的环境持久性,可能成为植物防御中合成农药的可行替代品。近年来,在改进这些产品的研发和效果方面已取得科学进展。然而,关于它们对环境和非目标物种的不利影响的知识仍然匮乏,特别是与合成产品相比。在此,我们总结了关于植物源生物农药对不同群居和独居蜜蜂群体毒性的研究。我们强调了这些产品对蜜蜂的致死和亚致死效应、缺乏评估生物农药对传粉者风险的统一方案,以及对特定蜜蜂群体(如庞大且多样的独居蜜蜂群体)研究的稀缺性。结果表明,植物源生物农药对蜜蜂会产生致死效应和大量亚致死效应。然而,将这些化合物的影响与合成化合物的影响相比较时,其毒性是有限的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b81/10053700/ccaf112d318e/insects-14-00247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b81/10053700/380bdeaea3c1/insects-14-00247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b81/10053700/ccaf112d318e/insects-14-00247-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b81/10053700/380bdeaea3c1/insects-14-00247-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b81/10053700/ccaf112d318e/insects-14-00247-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Are Botanical Biopesticides Safe for Bees (Hymenoptera, Apoidea)?植物源生物农药对蜜蜂(膜翅目,蜜蜂总科)是否安全?
Insects. 2023 Mar 2;14(3):247. doi: 10.3390/insects14030247.
2
Biopesticides and insect pollinators: Detrimental effects, outdated guidelines, and future directions.生物农药和传粉昆虫:有害影响、过时的指导方针和未来方向。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155714. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155714. Epub 2022 May 4.
3
Predicting acute contact toxicity of pesticides in honeybees (Apis mellifera) through a k-nearest neighbor model.通过k近邻模型预测农药对蜜蜂(西方蜜蜂)的急性接触毒性。
Chemosphere. 2017 Jan;166:438-444. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.092. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
4
Native Solitary Bees Provide Economically Significant Pollination Services to Confection Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) (Asterales: Asteraceae) Grown Across the Northern Great Plains.本地独居蜜蜂为生长在大平原北部的制糖向日葵(向日葵属:菊科)提供了具有重要经济意义的授粉服务。
J Econ Entomol. 2019 Feb 12;112(1):40-48. doi: 10.1093/jee/toy322.
5
Larval oral exposure to thiacloprid: Dose-response toxicity testing in solitary bees, Osmia spp. (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae).幼虫经口接触噻虫啉:独居熊蜂(膜翅目:切叶蜂科)的剂量反应毒性试验。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2021 Jun 1;215:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112143. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
6
Research Progress on the Synthetic Biology of Botanical Biopesticides.植物源生物农药合成生物学研究进展
Bioengineering (Basel). 2022 May 12;9(5):207. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9050207.
7
Botanical and synthetic pesticides alter the flower visitation rates of pollinator bees in Neotropical melon fields.植物源和合成农药会改变新热带瓜田传粉蜂的访花率。
Environ Pollut. 2019 Aug;251:591-599. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.133. Epub 2019 May 10.
8
Comparative toxicity of pesticides and environmental contaminants in bees: Are honey bees a useful proxy for wild bee species?农药和环境污染物对蜜蜂的比较毒性:蜜蜂是否是野生蜜蜂物种的有用替代物?
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Feb 1;578:357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.180. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
9
Lethal, sublethal, and combined effects of pesticides on bees: A meta-analysis and new risk assessment tools.农药对蜜蜂的致死、亚致死和联合效应:荟萃分析和新的风险评估工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:156857. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156857. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
10
Divergence and convergence of gut microbiomes of wild insect pollinators.野生传粉昆虫肠道微生物组的趋同与趋异。
mBio. 2023 Aug 31;14(4):e0127023. doi: 10.1128/mbio.01270-23. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Pheromone-Binding Proteins in Pest Control: From Molecular Insights to Real-World Applications.害虫防治中的信息素结合蛋白:从分子洞察到实际应用
J Agric Food Chem. 2025 Sep 3;73(35):21701-21727. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.5c03663. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
2
Changes in Selected Biochemical Markers of Honey Bees Exposed to Fermented Common Tansy Solution ( L.).暴露于发酵艾菊溶液(L.)的蜜蜂特定生化标志物的变化。
Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 4;14(19):2857. doi: 10.3390/ani14192857.

本文引用的文献

1
Revised guidance on the risk assessment of plant protection products on bees (, spp. and solitary bees).关于植物保护产品对蜜蜂( 、 属及独居蜂)风险评估的修订指南
EFSA J. 2023 May 11;21(5):e07989. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2023.7989. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Overview of the testing and assessment of effects of microbial pesticides on bees: strengths, challenges and perspectives.微生物农药对蜜蜂影响的测试与评估概述:优势、挑战与展望
Apidologie. 2021;52:1256-1277. doi: 10.1007/s13592-021-00900-7.
3
Biopesticides and insect pollinators: Detrimental effects, outdated guidelines, and future directions.
生物农药和传粉昆虫:有害影响、过时的指导方针和未来方向。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 1;837:155714. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155714. Epub 2022 May 4.
4
Anthropogenic influences on bee foraging.人为因素对蜜蜂觅食的影响。
Science. 2022 Mar 4;375(6584):970-972. doi: 10.1126/science.abn0185. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
5
Impact of microorganisms and entomopathogenic nematodes used for plant protection on solitary and social bee pollinators: Host range, specificity, pathogenicity, toxicity, and effects of experimental parameters.保护植物用微生物和昆虫病原线虫对独居和社会性传粉蜜蜂的影响:宿主范围、专一性、致病性、毒性以及实验参数的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2022 Jun 1;302:119051. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119051. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Status and Prospects of Botanical Biopesticides in Europe and Mediterranean Countries.欧洲和地中海国家植物源生物农药的现状与展望。
Biomolecules. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):311. doi: 10.3390/biom12020311.
7
Effects of sublethal azadirachtin on the immune response and midgut microbiome of Apis cerana cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae).印楝素亚致死浓度对中华蜜蜂(膜翅目:蜜蜂科)免疫反应和中肠微生物组的影响。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jan 1;229:113089. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.113089. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
8
Field-realistic neonicotinoid exposure has sub-lethal effects on non-Apis bees: A meta-analysis.田间现实条件下新烟碱类农药暴露对非 Apis 蜜蜂具有亚致死效应:一项荟萃分析。
Ecol Lett. 2021 Dec;24(12):2586-2597. doi: 10.1111/ele.13873. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
9
Agrochemicals interact synergistically to increase bee mortality.农用化学品协同作用增加蜜蜂死亡率。
Nature. 2021 Aug;596(7872):389-392. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03787-7. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
10
Assessment of the Vulnerability to Pesticide Exposures Across Bee Species.评估不同蜜蜂物种对农药暴露的易感性
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2021 Sep;40(9):2640-2651. doi: 10.1002/etc.5150. Epub 2021 Aug 8.