• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于连接共振频率分析探头以确定种植体稳定性的拧紧力是否需要标准化?

Is there a need for standardization of tightening force used to connect the transducer for resonance frequency analysis in determining implant stability?

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):886–890. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7361. Epub 2019 Apr 1.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.7361
PMID:30934030
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the minimum installation torque required to attach the transducer (measuring peg) to the implant to provide an accurate assessment of implant stability using resonance frequency analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred 4 ×11-mm screw-shaped titanium implants were inserted into a uniform polyurethane block with similar density to bone in a standardized surgical protocol. The implants were distributed into 10 groups, with 10 implants each (G1 to G10). In G1, the transducer was manually attached by a female operator and in G2 by a male operator using the manual connector provided by the manufacturer. For the remaining groups (G3 to G10), the transducers were installed using a connector adapted to a digital torque wrench with different torque settings: 3 Ncm (G3), 4 Ncm (G4), 5 Ncm (G5), 6 Ncm (G6), 10 Ncm (G7), 13 Ncm (G8), 17 Ncm (G9), and 20 Ncm (G10). Stability was measured for all groups using the Osstell equipment (Diagnosis of Integration) and the implant stability quotient (ISQ) annotated for statistical comparison between the groups.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation ISQ values for groups G1 to G10 were 9.50 ± 5.54, 19.05 ± 2.67, 29.25 ± 4.22, 26.55 ± 5.37, 40.90 ± 0.99, 69.60 ± 2.41, 71.30 ± 0.82, 71.20 ± 1.32, 72.40 ± 0.97, and 70.90 ± 0.88, respectively. Statistical comparisons determined that the amplitudes of the confidence intervals, relative to the standard deviations, were lowest for groups G5, G7, G8, G9, and G10. For the means, the lowest amplitudes of the confidence intervals were observed in G6, G7, G8, G9, and G10. When checking the conjugated confidence intervals (mean and standard deviation), the results were homogenous for G7, G8, G9, and G10. When the torque of 20 Ncm was reached, the connection between the transducer and the implant failed.

CONCLUSION

In this in vitro model experiment, transducer torques between 10 and 17 Ncm appear to be adequate for accurate measurement of implant stability, allowing more precise comparisons without damaging the prosthetic connection in the implant.

摘要

目的

本体外研究旨在确定将传感器(测量钉)固定到种植体上所需的最小安装扭矩,以便使用共振频率分析对种植体稳定性进行准确评估。

材料和方法

按照标准化手术方案,将 100 个 4×11mm 螺纹状钛种植体插入到具有类似骨密度的均匀聚氨酯块中。将种植体分为 10 组,每组 10 个(G1 至 G10)。在 G1 中,由女性操作人员手动连接传感器,在 G2 中由制造商提供的手动连接器由男性操作人员连接。对于其余组(G3 至 G10),使用与数字扭矩扳手适配的连接器安装传感器,具有不同的扭矩设置:3 Ncm(G3)、4 Ncm(G4)、5 Ncm(G5)、6 Ncm(G6)、10 Ncm(G7)、13 Ncm(G8)、17 Ncm(G9)和 20 Ncm(G10)。使用 Osstell 设备(整合诊断)对所有组进行稳定性测量,并为组间统计比较标记种植体稳定性指数(ISQ)。

结果

G1 至 G10 组的平均±标准偏差 ISQ 值分别为 9.50±5.54、19.05±2.67、29.25±4.22、26.55±5.37、40.90±0.99、69.60±2.41、71.30±0.82、71.20±1.32、72.40±0.97 和 70.90±0.88。统计比较确定,置信区间的幅度相对于标准偏差,在 G5、G7、G8、G9 和 G10 组中最低。对于平均值,在 G6、G7、G8、G9 和 G10 组中观察到置信区间的最低幅度。当检查共轭置信区间(均值和标准差)时,G7、G8、G9 和 G10 的结果是同质的。当达到 20 Ncm 的扭矩时,传感器和种植体之间的连接失效。

结论

在这项体外模型实验中,10 至 17 Ncm 的传感器扭矩似乎足以准确测量种植体稳定性,允许更精确的比较,而不会损坏种植体中的修复连接。

相似文献

1
Is there a need for standardization of tightening force used to connect the transducer for resonance frequency analysis in determining implant stability?用于连接共振频率分析探头以确定种植体稳定性的拧紧力是否需要标准化?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2019 July/August;34(4):886–890. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7361. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
2
Can Finger-Generated Force Be Used Reliably to Connect the Transducer for Resonance Frequency Analysis in Determining Implant Stability?手指生成的力量是否可以可靠地用于连接换能器,以进行共振频率分析来确定种植体稳定性?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):1141-1148. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8305.
3
An in vitro study evaluating the efficacy of a novel mount with torque control designed to tighten Osstell® transducers.一项评估具有扭矩控制的新型安装座以拧紧 Osstell®传感器的有效性的体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun;9(3):411-417. doi: 10.1002/cre2.734. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Influence of cortical bone anchorage on the primary stability of dental implants.皮质骨锚固对牙种植体初期稳定性的影响。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018 Sep;22(3):297-301. doi: 10.1007/s10006-018-0705-y. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
5
The Influence of Low Insertion Torque on Primary Stability, Implant Survival, and Maintenance of Marginal Bone Levels: A Closed-Cohort Prospective Study.低植入扭矩对初期稳定性、种植体存留率及边缘骨水平维持的影响:一项封闭队列前瞻性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2017 Jul/Aug;32(4):849-857. doi: 10.11607/jomi.5889.
6
In vitro comparison of resonance frequency analysis devices to evaluate implant stability of narrow diameter implants at varying drilling speeds in dense artificial bone blocks.在不同钻速下,评估密质人工骨块中窄直径种植体稳定性的共振频率分析装置的体外比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):1023-1027. doi: 10.1111/cid.12842. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
7
Are the Insertion Torque Value and Implant Stability Quotient Correlated, and If So, Can Insertion Torque Values Predict Secondary Implant Stability? A Prospective Parallel Cohort Study.种植体扭矩值与稳定性指数是否相关,如果相关,种植体扭矩值能否预测二次种植体稳定性?一项前瞻性平行队列研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 Jan-Feb;37(1):135-142. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9064.
8
Determination of the Optimum Torque to Tighten the Smartpegs of Magnetic Resonance Frequency Analyses Devices: An Ex Vivo Study.确定磁共振频率分析设备智能栓钉拧紧的最佳扭矩:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Dec;41(6):e252-6. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-14-00266. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
9
Influence of Bone Quality, Drilling Protocol, Implant Diameter/Length on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Comparative Study on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis.骨质量、钻孔方案、种植体直径/长度对初期稳定性的影响:一项关于植入扭矩和共振频率分析的体外对比研究
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Jun 1;46(3):182-189. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00145.
10
Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)?在共振频率分析(RFA)期间,智能桩的手动插入扭矩是否会影响种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的结果?
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Dec 12;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of dental implant with hydroxyapatite coating by laser-induced hydrothermal synthesis: in vitro and in vivo experimental study.通过激光诱导水热合成法对羟基磷灰石涂层牙种植体的评估:体外和体内实验研究
Discov Nano. 2025 Aug 12;20(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s11671-025-04330-7.
2
A three-year prospective cohort study evaluating implant stability utilising the Osstell® and Periotest™ devices.一项为期三年的前瞻性队列研究,使用Osstell®和Periotest™设备评估种植体稳定性。
Front Dent Med. 2023 Mar 13;4:1139407. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2023.1139407. eCollection 2023.
3
An in vitro study evaluating the efficacy of a novel mount with torque control designed to tighten Osstell® transducers.
一项评估具有扭矩控制的新型安装座以拧紧 Osstell®传感器的有效性的体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun;9(3):411-417. doi: 10.1002/cre2.734. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
4
Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
5
Can changes in implant macrogeometry accelerate the osseointegration process?: An in vivo experimental biomechanical and histological evaluations.种植体宏观结构的变化能否加速骨整合过程?:一项体内实验生物力学和组织学评估。
PLoS One. 2020 May 14;15(5):e0233304. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233304. eCollection 2020.
6
Under-Drilling versus Hybrid Osseodensification Technique: Differences in Implant Primary Stability and Bone Density of the Implant Bed Walls.欠钻与混合骨致密化技术:种植体初期稳定性及种植床壁骨密度的差异
Materials (Basel). 2020 Jan 15;13(2):390. doi: 10.3390/ma13020390.
7
Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)?在共振频率分析(RFA)期间,智能桩的手动插入扭矩是否会影响种植体稳定性商数(ISQ)的结果?
Int J Implant Dent. 2019 Dec 12;5(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s40729-019-0195-1.
8
Biomechanical Effects of a New Macrogeometry Design of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Experimental Analysis.新型牙种植体宏观几何设计的生物力学效应:一项体外实验分析
J Funct Biomater. 2019 Oct 25;10(4):47. doi: 10.3390/jfb10040047.