• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。

Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Stomatology, Faculty of Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Colegio Máximo de Cartuja S/N 18071, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y
PMID:35804172
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) provides an evaluation of implant stability over time. This analysis is a non-invasive, precise, and objective method. Several studies compare the RFA system with other devices. However, few investigations analyze repeatability and reproducibility between different operators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator concordance of the Osstell® ISQ.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

RFA measurements were performed with Osstell® ISQ in a total of 37 implants placed in 21 patients. At the time of implant placement, 6 measurements per implant were taken by three different experienced operators. Three measurements were carried out consecutively and three by removing and placing the SmartPeg-Osstell® to assess intra-operator and inter-operator agreement.

RESULTS

Intra-operator concordance according to the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed high concordance. The ICC values were higher than 0.9 (p < 0.0001) for consecutive measures and alternative measures, being almost perfect of Landis & Koch classification. For inter-operator concordance The ICC was 0.709 (p < 0.0001) and 0.670 (p < 0.0001) for consecutive and alternative measures, respectively, both estimates being in the substantial category. In torque and ISQ values, no statistically significant differences were observed when operators and measurements were compared.

CONCLUSIONS

Osstell® ISQ system was stable both in intra-operator and inter-operator measurements. This device has excellent repeatability and reproducibility, demonstrating reliability to measure the stability of dental implants.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) is a non-invasive, objective, and reliable diagnostic method to determine the ideal moment to load the implant, as well as to predict possible failures.

摘要

目的

共振频率分析(RFA)可提供随时间推移的植入物稳定性评估。这种分析是一种非侵入性、精确且客观的方法。有几项研究比较了 RFA 系统与其他设备。然而,很少有研究分析不同操作人员之间的可重复性和再现性。本研究旨在评估 Osstell® ISQ 的同内和同外操作者一致性。

材料和方法

在 21 名患者的 37 个植入物中,共进行了 RFA 测量。在植入物放置时,由三位经验丰富的操作员对每个植入物进行了 6 次测量。三次连续进行测量,三次通过移除和放置 SmartPeg-Osstell®进行测量,以评估同内和同外操作者之间的一致性。

结果

根据组内相关系数(ICC),同内一致性显示出高度一致性。ICC 值高于 0.9(p<0.0001),用于连续测量和替代测量,接近 Landis & Koch 分类的完美一致性。对于同外一致性,ICC 分别为 0.709(p<0.0001)和 0.670(p<0.0001),用于连续和替代测量,两个估计均为实质性类别。在扭矩和 ISQ 值方面,当操作员和测量值进行比较时,未观察到统计学差异。

结论

Osstell® ISQ 系统在同内和同外测量中均稳定。该设备具有出色的可重复性和再现性,证明其可靠性可用于测量种植牙的稳定性。

临床相关性

共振频率分析(RFA)是一种非侵入性、客观且可靠的诊断方法,可确定植入物加载的理想时机,并预测可能的失败。

相似文献

1
Intra- and inter-operator concordance of the resonance frequency analysis. A cross-sectional and prospective clinical study.共振频率分析的操作者内和操作者间一致性。一项横断面和前瞻性临床研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Nov;26(11):6521-6530. doi: 10.1007/s00784-022-04601-y. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
2
Comparison of Reliability of 3 Resonance Frequency Analysis Devices: An In Vitro Study.三种共振频率分析设备可靠性的比较:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2022 Feb 1;48(1):9-14. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139.
3
Initial Stability Measurements of Implants Using a New Magnetic Resonance Frequency Analyzer With Titanium Transducers: An Ex Vivo Study.使用带有钛换能器的新型磁共振频率分析仪对植入物进行初始稳定性测量:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Feb 1;46(1):35-40. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00126.
4
Resonance frequency analysis: Comparing two clinical instruments.共振频率分析:两种临床仪器比较。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Jun;20(3):308-312. doi: 10.1111/cid.12598. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
5
In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis.体外比较分析两种共振频率测量设备:Osstell 种植体稳定性测量仪和 Penguin 共振频率分析仪。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/cid.12868. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
6
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
7
An in vitro study evaluating the efficacy of a novel mount with torque control designed to tighten Osstell® transducers.一项评估具有扭矩控制的新型安装座以拧紧 Osstell®传感器的有效性的体外研究。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Jun;9(3):411-417. doi: 10.1002/cre2.734. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
8
Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ.两种共振频率测量设备的比较分析:Osstell Mentor和Osstell ISQ。
Implant Dent. 2014 Jun;23(3):351-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000072.
9
Assessment of Osstell ISQ's reliability for implant stability measurement: a cross-sectional clinical study.评估 Osstell ISQ 用于种植体稳定性测量的可靠性:一项横断面临床研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Nov 1;18(6):e877-82. doi: 10.4317/medoral.19120.
10
Osstell Resonance Frequency Measurement Values as a Prognostic Factor in Implant Dentistry.Osstell共振频率测量值作为种植牙科预后因素的研究
J Oral Implantol. 2015 Aug;41(4):e133-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-13-00172. Epub 2014 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing the primary stability of dental implants in type IV bone: in-vitro comparison of machine-driven and ratcheting insertion protocols.优化IV型骨中牙种植体的初期稳定性:机器驱动与棘轮式植入方案的体外比较
Eur Oral Res. 2025 Jan 5;59(1):46-52. doi: 10.26650/eor.20241296069.
2
A Comparative Evaluation of the Primary and Secondary Stability of Dental Implants with Progressive and Conventional Thread Designs: A Prospective Non-Interventional Study of 100 Implants in 62 Patients.具有渐进式和传统螺纹设计的牙种植体的一级和二级稳定性的比较评估:一项对62例患者的100颗种植体进行的前瞻性非干预性研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 28;14(9):3040. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093040.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study.再生骨与非再生骨植入稳定性的比较:一项前瞻性队列研究
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 21;10(15):3220. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153220.
2
Comparing success of immediate versus delay loading of implants in fresh sockets: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较即刻负载与延迟负载种植体在新鲜牙槽窝中的成功率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022 Jun;26(2):185-194. doi: 10.1007/s10006-021-00983-7. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
3
Reliability Verification of Damping Capacity Assessment Through In Vitro Analysis of Implant Micromotion in Peri-implant Bone Loss Model.
Influencing factors and evaluation methods for early stability of immediate implant.
即刻种植体早期稳定性的影响因素及其评价方法。
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Feb 28;49(2):305-311. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2024.230244.
4
Influence of different surgical techniques on primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.不同外科手术技术对上颌后牙区初次种植体稳定性的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Jul;27(7):3499-3508. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-04962-y. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
通过种植体周围骨吸收模型中种植体微动的体外分析进行阻尼能力评估的可靠性验证
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):106-114. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8168.
4
Can Finger-Generated Force Be Used Reliably to Connect the Transducer for Resonance Frequency Analysis in Determining Implant Stability?手指生成的力量是否可以可靠地用于连接换能器,以进行共振频率分析来确定种植体稳定性?
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 Nov/Dec;35(6):1141-1148. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8305.
5
Implant loss and crestal bone loss in immediate versus delayed load in edentulous mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis.即刻负载与延迟负载在下颌无牙颌中对种植体丢失和牙槽骨吸收的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 Mar;125(3):437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.01.032. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
6
Comparison of implant stability measurements between a resonance frequency analysis device and a modified damping capacity analysis device: an study.共振频率分析装置与改良阻尼能力分析装置之间种植体稳定性测量的比较:一项研究。
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2020 Feb 18;50(1):56-66. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2020.50.1.56. eCollection 2020 Feb.
7
Initial Stability Measurements of Implants Using a New Magnetic Resonance Frequency Analyzer With Titanium Transducers: An Ex Vivo Study.使用带有钛换能器的新型磁共振频率分析仪对植入物进行初始稳定性测量:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2020 Feb 1;46(1):35-40. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00126.
8
In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis.体外比较分析两种共振频率测量设备:Osstell 种植体稳定性测量仪和 Penguin 共振频率分析仪。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/cid.12868. Epub 2019 Nov 12.
9
Repeatability of the resonance frequency analysis values in implants with a new technology.新型种植体的共振频率分析值具有可重复性。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2019 Sep 1;24(5):e636-e642. doi: 10.4317/medoral.22761.
10
Factors Influencing Resonance Frequency Analysis (RFA) Measurements and 5-Year Survival of Neoss Dental Implants.影响Neoss种植牙共振频率分析(RFA)测量及5年生存率的因素。
Int J Dent. 2019 Apr 1;2019:3209872. doi: 10.1155/2019/3209872. eCollection 2019.