Thomas Fedelyne, Chung Sunyoung, Holt David W
J Extra Corpor Technol. 2019 Mar;51(1):12-19.
The use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has greatly increased over the years; however, the survival rate is only above 56%. There has been a drastic increase in ECMO centers and cases. ECMO has become a popular therapy route for patients with respiratory and cardiac complications; however, patient safety is a major concern. Perfusion and non-perfusion students from the University of Nebraska Medical Center were recruited to participate in three simulation trials. The trials consisted of five different tasks that are required for managing or preventing catastrophic events on ECMO. Students were evaluated for the time it took to complete each task, number of errors made, and protocol referencing. The data indicated that there was a decrease in time for the 1st vs. 2nd trial ( = .02) for perfusion students and a decrease from the 1st to 3rd trial ( = .001) for the circuit set-up simulation. There was a decrease in priming time from the 1st to 3rd trial ( = .02) and for the pump change ( = .0098) for the perfusion students as well. The non-perfusion students had a significant decrease in time for the circuit set-up in the 1st vs. 2nd ( = .004) and 1st vs. 3rd trial ( = .002). There was a decrease in time for priming (.004), pump change ( = .002), tubing change ( = .0098), and errors during the tubing change ( = .02) in the non-perfusion students. Both groups felt more confident after the simulations and the non-perfusion students specifically felt like they were more familiar with the purpose of ECMO after the simulation. ECMO simulations and protocols may improve patient safety by strengthening the skills needed for rapid management, fewer errors, and higher levels of confidence during the management of ECMO and catastrophic events.
多年来,体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)的使用大幅增加;然而,生存率仅略高于56%。ECMO中心和病例数急剧增加。ECMO已成为治疗呼吸和心脏并发症患者的常用治疗途径;然而,患者安全是一个主要问题。内布拉斯加大学医学中心的灌注专业和非灌注专业学生被招募参加三项模拟试验。试验包括五项不同的任务,这些任务是管理或预防ECMO上的灾难性事件所必需的。对学生完成每项任务所需的时间、所犯错误的数量以及方案参考情况进行了评估。数据表明,灌注专业学生在第一次试验与第二次试验之间时间减少(P = 0.02),在回路设置模拟中从第一次试验到第三次试验时间减少(P = 0.001)。灌注专业学生在第一次试验与第三次试验之间预充时间减少(P = 0.02),更换泵时时间也减少(P = 0.0098)。非灌注专业学生在第一次试验与第二次试验(P = 0.004)以及第一次试验与第三次试验(P = 0.002)的回路设置时间显著减少。非灌注专业学生在预充(P = 0.004)、更换泵(P =