Fujimoto Norimasa, Nakamura Hikaru, Tsuda Tetsuya, Wakutani Yosuke, Takao Takeo
Department of Rehabilitation, Kurashiki Heisei Hospital, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan.
Department of Health and Welfare Science, Okayama Prefectural University, Soja, Okayama, Japan,
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Mar 20;15:713-720. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S193645. eCollection 2019.
Brain-damaged patients often have difficulty understanding non-literal language. However, whether patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) have comprehension deficits of metaphorical expressions, in contrast with non-metaphorical (literal) expressions, remains unclear.
The subjects were 40 AD patients; 20 had mild AD (17-23 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE]), and 20 had very mild AD (≥24 points). Twenty normal elderly controls were also enrolled as a control group. Thirty sentences that contained novel similes (Items) were prepared. For each Item, four explanatory choices, consisting of one correct response and three foils, were provided. The participants were asked to choose the written statement that best represented the Item's meaning. In addition, all the subjects completed the Token Test.
The patients with mild AD had significantly lower scores than the normal controls on both the simile comprehension test and the Token Test. However, the patients with very mild AD exhibited significantly lower scores on the simile comprehension test, but not on the Token Test. The distributions of error types for the simile test differed between the mild AD group and the other groups. The mild AD patients made more errors that were "far" from the correct responses.
Patients with AD are more likely to have comprehension deficits of metaphorical expressions than comprehension deficits of non-metaphorical expressions. Pragmatic language dysfunction may precede formal language dysfunction during the progression of AD.
脑损伤患者通常在理解非字面语言方面存在困难。然而,与非隐喻(字面)表达相比,阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者是否存在隐喻表达理解缺陷仍不明确。
受试者为40例AD患者,其中20例为轻度AD(简易精神状态检查表[MMSE]评分为17 - 23分),20例为极轻度AD(≥24分)。另外招募20名正常老年对照作为对照组。准备了30个包含新颖明喻(项目)的句子。对于每个项目,提供四个解释选项,包括一个正确答案和三个干扰项。要求参与者选择最能代表项目含义的书面陈述。此外,所有受试者均完成了代币测验。
轻度AD患者在明喻理解测试和代币测验中的得分均显著低于正常对照组。然而,极轻度AD患者在明喻理解测试中的得分显著较低,但在代币测验中并非如此。轻度AD组与其他组在明喻测试中的错误类型分布有所不同。轻度AD患者做出的错误答案与正确答案“差距较大”。
与非隐喻表达理解缺陷相比,AD患者更易出现隐喻表达理解缺陷。在AD进展过程中,语用语言功能障碍可能先于形式语言功能障碍出现。