Xu Xu
School of Behavioral Sciences and Education, Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg, Middletown, PA 17057, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2010 Apr;39(2):165-78. doi: 10.1007/s10936-009-9131-5.
Recent research suggests that the quality of a metaphorical topic-vehicle pairing should be the determinant to the choice of a proper grammatical form, nominal metaphor versus simile. Two studies examined the relationship between the quality of the content of a metaphorical statement and its grammatical form. Study 1 showed that the two grammatical forms did not differ in aptness when the quality of topic-vehicle pairs and the conventionality of vehicles, a factor associated with the quality of metaphorical expressions, were controlled. With an online comprehension measure, Study 2 found that high quality metaphorical pairings were easier to process than low quality metaphorical pairings in both the metaphor form and the simile form. For high quality metaphorical pairings, information related to both the topics and the vehicles was highly activated at an early stage of processing. The relations among factors involved in the interpretive process of metaphorical language are discussed.
近期研究表明,隐喻性主题-喻体配对的质量应是决定选择恰当语法形式(名词性隐喻与明喻)的因素。两项研究考察了隐喻陈述内容的质量与其语法形式之间的关系。研究1表明,当主题-喻体配对的质量以及喻体的常规性(与隐喻表达质量相关的一个因素)得到控制时,两种语法形式在恰当性方面并无差异。通过一项在线理解测试,研究2发现,在隐喻形式和明喻形式中,高质量的隐喻配对都比低质量的隐喻配对更易于处理。对于高质量的隐喻配对,与主题和喻体相关的信息在处理的早期阶段就会被高度激活。本文还讨论了隐喻性语言解释过程中涉及的各因素之间的关系。