• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

软系统方法论在医疗保健变革管理中的应用研究:范围综述方案。

Mapping the use of soft systems methodology for change management in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e026028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026028.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026028
PMID:30940758
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6500268/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

It is notoriously challenging to implement evidence-based care and to update and improve healthcare practices. One reason for the difficulty is the complexity of healthcare and the powerful influence of context on implementation and improvement efforts. Thus, there is a need for multifaceted, flexible change methods that takes these complexities into consideration. One approach that has the potential in this regard is soft systems methodology (SSM). However, little is known about how SSM has been applied in healthcare settings, making it difficult to assess the usefulness of SSM for implementation science or improvement research. The aim of the proposed scoping review is to examine and map the use and outcomes of SSM in healthcare.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review will adapt the framework outlined by Arksey and O'Malley (2005). Citations will be uncovered through a comprehensive database search of the peer-reviewed literature. Two reviewers will conduct a two-stage review and selection process where the titles/abstracts are examined followed by a screening of full texts of the selected citations. Reference lists of included citations will be snowballed to identify potential additional citations. Inclusion criteria are English language, peer-reviewed empirical papers focusing on the application of SSM in a healthcare setting. Both general information about the citations and information related to the objective of the review will be extracted from the included citations and entered into a data charting form. The extracted information will be reported in diagrams and tables and summarised to present a narrative account of the literature. The proposed review will provide information on the potential for using SSM to affect change in healthcare.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

No primary data will be collected, and thus ethical permission is unnecessary. Dissemination of results include peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

摘要

简介

将循证护理付诸实践并更新和改进医疗实践极具挑战性。之所以困难,一个原因是医疗保健的复杂性以及背景对实施和改进工作的强大影响。因此,需要多方面、灵活的变革方法来考虑这些复杂性。在这方面,有一种方法具有潜力,即软系统方法论(SSM)。然而,人们对 SSM 在医疗保健环境中的应用知之甚少,因此难以评估 SSM 在实施科学或改进研究方面的有用性。拟议的范围综述旨在检查和绘制 SSM 在医疗保健中的使用和结果。

方法和分析

该综述将采用 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)概述的框架。引文将通过对同行评审文献的全面数据库搜索来发现。两位审查员将进行两阶段审查和选择过程,其中检查标题/摘要,然后筛选选定引文的全文。纳入引文的参考文献将被滚雪球式地识别潜在的其他引文。纳入标准为英语,同行评审的实证论文,重点关注 SSM 在医疗保健环境中的应用。将从纳入的引文中提取有关引文的一般信息和与综述目的相关的信息,并将其输入到数据图表形式中。提取的信息将以图表和表格的形式报告,并进行总结,以呈现文献的叙述性描述。拟议的综述将提供有关使用 SSM 影响医疗保健变化的潜力的信息。

伦理和传播

不会收集原始数据,因此不需要伦理许可。结果的传播包括同行评审的出版物和会议演讲。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53df/6500268/9bc74611a819/bmjopen-2018-026028f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53df/6500268/9bc74611a819/bmjopen-2018-026028f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/53df/6500268/9bc74611a819/bmjopen-2018-026028f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Mapping the use of soft systems methodology for change management in healthcare: a scoping review protocol.软系统方法论在医疗保健变革管理中的应用研究:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 1;9(4):e026028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026028.
2
Change and improvement 50 years in the making: a scoping review of the use of soft systems methodology in healthcare.历经50年的变革与进步:对软系统方法论在医疗保健领域应用的范围审查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05929-5.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Integrating equity, diversity and inclusion throughout the lifecycle of AI within healthcare: a scoping review protocol.在医疗保健领域人工智能的整个生命周期中融入公平、多样性和包容性:一项范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Sep 26;13(9):e072069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072069.
5
Quality indicators for substance use disorder care: a scoping review protocol.物质使用障碍护理的质量指标:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 29;15(3):e085216. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085216.
6
Methods for the health technology assessment of complex interventions: a protocol for a scoping review.复杂干预措施的卫生技术评估方法:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 30;10(11):e039263. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039263.
7
Supporting implementation of interventions to address ethnicity-related health inequities: frameworks, facilitators and barriers - a scoping review protocol.支持实施干预措施以解决与族裔相关的健康不平等问题:框架、促进因素和障碍 - 范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Feb 9;13(2):e065721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065721.
8
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
9
Application of core functions and forms in complex health intervention research: a scoping review protocol.核心功能与形式在复杂健康干预研究中的应用:一项范围综述方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 8;15(1):e091088. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091088.
10
Barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of pharmacist services in primary care clinics: a scoping review protocol.在基层医疗诊所中实施药剂师服务的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 11;12(1):e057191. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057191.

引用本文的文献

1
The National Paediatric Applied Research Translation Initiative (N-PARTI): using implementation science to improve primary care for Australian children with asthma, type 1 diabetes, and infections.国家儿科应用研究转化计划(N-PARTI):运用实施科学改善澳大利亚哮喘、1型糖尿病和感染儿童的初级保健。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12491-5.
2
Creating pragmatic, rapid-cycle, evidence-based innovation: The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Delivery Science and Applied Research (DARE) program.创造实用、快速循环、基于证据的创新:北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团的交付科学与应用研究(DARE)项目。
Learn Health Syst. 2024 May 6;9(1):e10424. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10424. eCollection 2025 Jan.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Being pragmatic about healthcare complexity: our experiences applying complexity theory and pragmatism to health services research.务实看待医疗保健复杂性:我们将复杂性理论和实用主义应用于卫生服务研究的经验。
BMC Med. 2018 Jun 20;16(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1087-6.
2
When complexity science meets implementation science: a theoretical and empirical analysis of systems change.当复杂性科学遇见实施科学:系统变革的理论与实证分析。
BMC Med. 2018 Apr 30;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12916-018-1057-z.
3
Quality of Health Care for Children in Australia, 2012-2013.
Using the Soft Systems Methodology to Link Healthcare and Long-Term Care Delivery Systems: A Case Study of Community Policy Coordinator Activities in Japan.
运用软系统方法论链接医疗保健与长期照护服务体系:以日本社区政策协调员活动为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8462. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148462.
4
Implementing and evaluating co-designed change in health.实施和评估共同设计的健康变革。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Feb;115(2):48-51. doi: 10.1177/01410768211070206. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
5
A dynamic systems view of clinical genomics: a rich picture of the landscape in Australia using a complexity science lens.临床基因组学的动态系统观点:用复杂性科学视角描绘澳大利亚的全景图。
BMC Med Genomics. 2021 Feb 27;14(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12920-021-00910-5.
6
Change and improvement 50 years in the making: a scoping review of the use of soft systems methodology in healthcare.历经50年的变革与进步:对软系统方法论在医疗保健领域应用的范围审查
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 23;20(1):1063. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05929-5.
2012 - 2013年澳大利亚儿童的医疗保健质量
JAMA. 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1113-1124. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.0162.
4
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
5
The Dynamic Integrated Evaluation Model (DIEM): Achieving Sustainability in Organizational Intervention through a Participatory Evaluation Approach.动态综合评估模型(DIEM):通过参与式评估方法实现组织干预的可持续性
Stress Health. 2016 Oct;32(4):285-293. doi: 10.1002/smi.2701. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
6
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.
7
Novel Programs, International Adoptions, or Contextual Adaptations? Meta-Analytical Results From German and Swedish Intervention Research.新型项目、国际收养还是背景调整?德国和瑞典干预研究的元分析结果。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;45(6):784-796. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1020540. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
8
The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change.动态可持续性框架:应对持续变化中的维持悖论。
Implement Sci. 2013 Oct 2;8:117. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-117.
9
Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic.组内一致性:kappa 统计量。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82.
10
CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia.CareTrack:评估澳大利亚医疗服务提供的适宜性。
Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16;197(2):100-5. doi: 10.5694/mja12.10510.