• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1-2.5cm 透光性肾结石的最佳无创治疗:口服溶石治疗、体外冲击波碎石术或联合治疗——一项随机对照试验。

Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Urology Department, Urology and Nephrology Center, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.

Urology Department, Mediclin Muritz Hospital, Waren, Germany.

出版信息

World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):207-212. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02746-2. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02746-2
PMID:30944968
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of oral dissolution therapy (ODT), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL), and combined SWL and ODT for medium-sized radiolucent renal stone (RLS).

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial for patients with medium-sized RLS, 1-2.5 cm, ≤ 500 Hounsfield unit (HU). The ODT patients were counseled for oral potassiumsodium-hydrogen citrate (Uralyt-U). The 2nd group underwent SWL and the last group had combined SWL and ODT. The primary outcome, stone-free rate (SFR) at 3 months, was assessed by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT). We defined complete response (success) if no residual fragment were detected by NCCT; partial response (failure) if there was a decrease in stone size, but presence of residual stones; no response if there was no change or increase in stone size (failure).

RESULTS

150 patients completed follow-up. The SFR at 1st month and 3rd month were, respectively; 16% and 50% in the ODT group, 10% and 46% in the SWL group, and 35% and 72% patients in combined group with (p = 0.03 and 0.003, respectively. The overall SFR for all groups was 66%. Combined treatment and initial response in first month follow-up were independent factors predicting SFR. In addition, combined treatment significantly decreased the overall stone volume (p = 0.03) and the need for additional stone management procedures after 3 months (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Combined ODT and SWL treatment constitutes the most rapid and effective therapeutic approach for medium-sized RLS, decreasing overall stone volume as well as the number of SWL sessions needed in comparison to SWL therapy, alone.

摘要

目的

评估口服溶解疗法(ODT)、体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)和联合 SWL 和 ODT 治疗中等大小透光肾结石(RLS)的疗效。

方法

一项针对中等大小 RLS 患者的随机对照试验,结石大小为 1-2.5cm,≤500 亨氏单位(HU)。ODT 组患者接受口服柠檬酸钾钠氢(Uralyt-U)治疗。第二组接受 SWL 治疗,最后一组接受联合 SWL 和 ODT 治疗。主要结局为 3 个月时的结石清除率(SFR),通过非增强计算机断层扫描(NCCT)评估。如果 NCCT 未检测到残留碎片,则定义为完全反应(成功);如果结石大小减小但仍有残留结石,则定义为部分反应(失败);如果结石大小无变化或增大,则定义为无反应(失败)。

结果

150 例患者完成随访。ODT 组第 1 个月和第 3 个月的 SFR 分别为 16%和 50%,SWL 组分别为 10%和 46%,联合组分别为 35%和 72%(p=0.03 和 0.003)。所有组的总体 SFR 为 66%。联合治疗和第 1 个月随访时的初始反应是 SFR 的独立预测因素。此外,联合治疗显著降低了总体结石体积(p=0.03)和 3 个月后需要额外的结石处理程序(p=0.01)。

结论

与单独使用 SWL 治疗相比,ODT 和 SWL 的联合治疗是治疗中等大小 RLS 最快速有效的治疗方法,可降低总体结石体积和所需的 SWL 治疗次数。

相似文献

1
Optimal non-invasive treatment of 1-2.5 cm radiolucent renal stones: oral dissolution therapy, shock wave lithotripsy or combined treatment-a randomized controlled trial.1-2.5cm 透光性肾结石的最佳无创治疗:口服溶石治疗、体外冲击波碎石术或联合治疗——一项随机对照试验。
World J Urol. 2020 Jan;38(1):207-212. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02746-2. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
2
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for treatment of large pediatric renal pelvic stone burden more than 2 cm.体外冲击波碎石术治疗 2cm 以上的儿童肾盂大结石负担。
J Pediatr Urol. 2023 Oct;19(5):561.e1-561.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.06.017. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
3
A Prospective Evaluation of High-Resolution CT Parameters in Predicting Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy Success for Upper Urinary Tract Calculi.高分辨率CT参数预测上尿路结石体外冲击波碎石术成功率的前瞻性评估
J Endourol. 2016 Nov;30(11):1227-1232. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0364. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
4
Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density ≥ 1000 HU. A prospective study.优化冲击波碎石术治疗单个中等大小、结石密度≥1000 HU 的肾结石:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2022 Jan;40(1):243-250. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03807-1. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
5
The Predictive Role of Abdominal Fat Parameters and Stone Density on SWL Outcomes.腹部脂肪参数和结石密度对体外冲击波碎石术治疗效果的预测作用。
Curr Med Imaging Rev. 2020;16(1):80-87. doi: 10.2174/1573405614666180927112127.
6
Role of Hounsfield Unit in Predicting Outcomes of Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Renal Calculi: Outcomes of a Systematic Review.Hounsfield 单位在预测冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石结局中的作用:系统评价结果。
Curr Urol Rep. 2023 Apr;24(4):173-185. doi: 10.1007/s11934-023-01145-w. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
7
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy Management of Renal Stones in Children: Does Anesthesia Affect the Treatment Outcomes on an Age-based Manner?儿童肾结石的体外冲击波碎石治疗:麻醉是否会按年龄影响治疗结果?
Urology. 2017 Sep;107:218-222. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.05.020. Epub 2017 May 22.
8
Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography.通过计算机断层扫描上的皮肤到结石距离确定冲击波碎石术的成功率。
Urology. 2005 Nov;66(5):941-4. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.05.011.
9
Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi.评估平均结石密度和皮肤至结石距离在预测肾和输尿管结石冲击波碎石术成功率中的重要性。
Urol Res. 2010 Aug;38(4):307-13. doi: 10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
10
A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.一种用于预测儿童冲击波碎石术治疗结果的新列线图。
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):84.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Potassium sodium hydrogen citrate intervention on gut microbiota and clinical features in uric acid stone patients.枸橼酸钾钠氢干预尿酸结石患者的肠道微生物群和临床特征。
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024 Dec;108(1):51. doi: 10.1007/s00253-023-12953-y. Epub 2024 Jan 6.
2
Predictors of stone-free rate after a single-session extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for a single kidney stone measuring 10 to 20 mm: A private center experience.单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗单个直径为10至20毫米肾结石后结石清除率的预测因素:一家私立中心的经验
Curr Urol. 2023 Mar;17(1):30-35. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000152. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Automated Computer Software Compared with Manual Measurements for CT-Based Urinary Stone Metrics: An Evaluation Study.基于CT的尿路结石指标的自动计算机软件与手动测量的比较:一项评估研究。
J Endourol. 2018 May;32(5):455-461. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0787. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
2
Imaging in Urolithiasis.尿路结石的影像学检查
Radiol Clin North Am. 2017 Mar;55(2):209-224. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
3
Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II.结石的外科治疗:美国泌尿外科学会/腔内泌尿外科学会指南,第二部分。
The impact of stenting prior to oral chemolysis of upper urinary tract uric acid stones.
支架置入术对口服化学溶石治疗上尿路尿酸结石的影响。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Jan;54(1):37-45. doi: 10.1007/s11255-021-03072-6. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
4
Oral chemolysis is an effective, non-invasive therapy for urinary stones suspected of uric acid content.口服化学溶解法是一种针对怀疑含有尿酸成分的尿路结石的有效非侵入性治疗方法。
Urolithiasis. 2020 Dec;48(6):501-507. doi: 10.1007/s00240-020-01204-8. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.091. Epub 2016 May 27.
4
Treatment of Renal Stones ≥20 mm with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy.体外冲击波碎石术治疗直径≥20毫米的肾结石
Urol Int. 2016;96(1):99-105. doi: 10.1159/000441424. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Guideline of guidelines: kidney stones.指南的指南:肾结石
BJU Int. 2015 Aug;116(2):184-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13080. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
6
A prospective, randomized comparison of shock wave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery and miniperc for treatment of 1 to 2 cm radiolucent lower calyceal renal calculi: a single center experience.一项前瞻性、随机对照研究比较了冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术和 miniperc 治疗 1 至 2cm 透光性下盏肾结石:单中心经验。
J Urol. 2015 Jan;193(1):160-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.07.088. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
7
Medical management of kidney stones: AUA guideline.肾结石的医学管理:AUA 指南。
J Urol. 2014 Aug;192(2):316-24. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 20.
8
Dissolution therapy versus shock wave lithotripsy for radiolucent renal stones in children: a prospective study.溶解疗法与冲击波碎石术治疗儿童透光性肾结石:前瞻性研究。
J Urol. 2014 May;191(5 Suppl):1491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.10.060. Epub 2014 Mar 26.
9
Results of urinary dissolution therapy for radiolucent calculi.尿溶性结石溶解治疗的结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2013 Jan-Feb;39(1):103-7. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2013.01.13.
10
Comparison of retrograde intrarenal surgery, shockwave lithotripsy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of medium-sized radiolucent renal stones.比较逆行性肾内手术、体外冲击波碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术治疗中等大小透光性肾结石。
World J Urol. 2013 Dec;31(6):1581-6. doi: 10.1007/s00345-012-0991-1. Epub 2012 Nov 22.