Suppr超能文献

不同热塑性材料对透明矫正器的体外细胞毒性。

In vitro cytotoxicity of different thermoplastic materials for clear aligners.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2019 Nov;89(6):942-945. doi: 10.2319/091718-674.1. Epub 2019 Apr 4.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the in vitro cytotoxicity of different thermoplastic materials for clear aligners on human primary gingival fibroblasts (HGFs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four materials for clear aligners were considered in this study: Duran (Scheu-Dental GmbH, Iserlohn, Germany), Biolon (Dreve Dentamid GmbH, Unna, Germany), Zendura (Bay Materials LLC, Fremont, CA, USA), and SmartTrack (Align Technology, San Jose, CA, USA). Three out of four materials (Duran, Biolon, Zendura) were assessed as thermoformed and nonthermoformed, whereas the SmartTrack was assessed only as thermoformed. The samples were placed at 37°C in airtight test tubes containing Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM; 0.1 mg/mL) for 14 days. The cell viability of HGFs cultured with this medium was assessed by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Data were analyzed by means of one-way and two-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Each material exhibited a slight cytotoxic effect after 14 days. The highest cytotoxicity level on HGFs was achieved by Biolon (64.6% ± 3.3 of cell viability), followed by Zendura (74.4% ± 2.3 of cell viability), SmartTrack (78.8% ± 6.3 of cell viability), and finally Duran (84.6% ± 4 of cell viability), which was the least cytotoxic. In the comparison between nonthermoformed and thermoformed materials for Duran, Biolon, and Zendura, the thermoformed materials showed the highest level of cytotoxicity ( < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Under the experimental conditions of this study, all the materials for clear aligners presented a slight cytotoxicity. Biolon was the most cytotoxic and the thermoforming process increased the cytotoxicity of the materials.

摘要

目的

研究不同热塑材料对人牙龈成纤维细胞(HGFs)的体外细胞毒性。

材料与方法

本研究共考虑了四种用于透明矫治器的材料:Duran(Scheu-Dental GmbH,Iserlohn,德国)、Biolon(Dreve Dentamid GmbH,Unna,德国)、Zendura(Bay Materials LLC,Fremont,CA,美国)和 SmartTrack(Align Technology,圣何塞,CA,美国)。其中三种材料(Duran、Biolon、Zendura)评估为热成型和非热成型,而 SmartTrack 仅评估为热成型。将样本置于 37°C 的密封试管中,内含含 Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium(DMEM;0.1 mg/mL)的培养液中培养 14 天。用 3-(4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基)-2,5-二苯基四氮唑溴盐(MTT)法评估 HGFs 培养物的细胞活力。采用单因素和双因素方差分析及事后检验(α=0.05)对数据进行分析。

结果

每种材料在 14 天后均表现出轻微的细胞毒性。对 HGFs 细胞毒性最高的是 Biolon(细胞活力 64.6%±3.3),其次是 Zendura(细胞活力 74.4%±2.3)、SmartTrack(细胞活力 78.8%±6.3),最后是 Duran(细胞活力 84.6%±4),即细胞毒性最小。在 Duran、Biolon 和 Zendura 的非热成型和热成型材料的比较中,热成型材料表现出最高的细胞毒性(<.001)。

结论

在本研究的实验条件下,所有透明矫治器材料均表现出轻微的细胞毒性。Biolon 的细胞毒性最大,热成型过程增加了材料的细胞毒性。

相似文献

8
The cytotoxicity assessment of different clear aligner materials.不同透明矫治器材料的细胞毒性评估
J Dent Sci. 2024 Oct;19(4):2065-2073. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.05.025. Epub 2024 May 31.

引用本文的文献

4
Thermoplastics for Clear Aligners: A Review.用于透明矫治器的热塑性塑料:综述
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jun 17;17(12):1681. doi: 10.3390/polym17121681.
9
Assessment of cytotoxicity of clear aligners coated with zinc oxide nanoparticles.评估涂有氧化锌纳米颗粒的透明矫治器的细胞毒性。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Mar-Apr;15(2):262-265. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2025.01.010. Epub 2025 Feb 11.

本文引用的文献

9
Orthodontic appliance preferences of children and adolescents.儿童和青少年对正畸矫治器的偏好。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Dec;138(6):698.e1-12; discussion 698-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验