Gao Li, Xiao Zhuoran, Jia Chunhua, Wang Wei
School of Preclinical Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Apr;98(14):e15100. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015100.
Chinese herbal medicines (CHM) have been commonly used in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea in East Asia. Several systematic reviews have been conducted to assess the clinical efficacy of CHM in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea. However, their comparative efficacy is still unclear. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) to systematically compare the advantages of different CHM in the treatment of primary dysmenorrhea.
The following electronic databases will be searched in this study: Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Scientific Journal Database, and Wan-fang Database. Search terms include (Chinese herbal medicine or Chinese patent medicine or medicinal plants or phytotherapy or traditional medicine or Chinese herbal drugs or plant extracts or herbal medicine or herbal extract or herb or traditional Chinese medicine) and (primary dysmenorrhea or dysmenorrhea or painful menstruation) and (randomized controlled trial). The language will be limited to Chinese and English, and the search date will be up to May 2019. The included studies must be randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with patients diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea. CHM must be used as interventions in the experimental group. While in the control group, studies that used a different herbal medicine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), or placebo will be included. The primary outcomes include clinical efficacy and visual analog scale (VAS), and the secondary outcomes include adverse events and quality of life. Four reviewers will independently extract the data and assess the qualities of the studies. Statistical analysis will be conducted with R package for each outcome.
Ethical approval is not required as this NMA is based on published studies. The completed NMA will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal.
PROSPERO CRD42018095254.
中草药在东亚地区常用于治疗原发性痛经。已经进行了多项系统评价来评估中草药治疗原发性痛经的临床疗效。然而,它们的相对疗效仍不明确。因此,本研究的目的是进行一项网状荟萃分析(NMA),以系统比较不同中草药治疗原发性痛经的优势。
本研究将检索以下电子数据库:科学网、PubMed、考克兰图书馆、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普数据库和万方数据库。检索词包括(中草药或中成药或药用植物或植物疗法或传统医学或中草药或植物提取物或草药或中药)和(原发性痛经或痛经或痛经)和(随机对照试验)。语言将限于中文和英文,检索日期截至2019年5月。纳入的研究必须是诊断为原发性痛经患者的随机对照试验(RCT)。实验组必须使用中草药作为干预措施。而在对照组中,将纳入使用不同草药、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)或安慰剂的研究。主要结局包括临床疗效和视觉模拟评分(VAS),次要结局包括不良事件和生活质量。四位评价者将独立提取数据并评估研究质量。将使用R软件包对每个结局进行统计分析。
由于本NMA基于已发表的研究,因此无需伦理批准。完成的NMA将发表在同行评审的科学期刊上。
PROSPERO CRD42018095254。