• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risks to Privacy With Use of Social Media: Understanding the Views of Social Media Users With Serious Mental Illness.社交媒体使用中的隐私风险:了解有严重精神疾病的社交媒体用户的看法。
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):561-568. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800520. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
2
Exploring opportunities to support mental health care using social media: A survey of social media users with mental illness.利用社交媒体探索支持心理健康护理的机会:一项针对患有精神疾病的社交媒体用户的调查。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;13(3):405-413. doi: 10.1111/eip.12496. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
3
The future of mental health care: peer-to-peer support and social media.心理健康照护的未来:朋辈支持和社交媒体。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2016 Apr;25(2):113-22. doi: 10.1017/S2045796015001067. Epub 2016 Jan 8.
4
Public Concern About Monitoring Twitter Users and Their Conversations to Recruit for Clinical Trials: Survey Study.公众对监测推特用户及其对话以招募临床试验参与者的关注:调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Oct 30;21(10):e15455. doi: 10.2196/15455.
5
Online Communication about Depression and Anxiety among Twitter Users with Schizophrenia: Preliminary Findings to Inform a Digital Phenotype Using Social Media.Twitter 用户中精神分裂症患者的抑郁和焦虑症的在线交流:使用社交媒体为数字表型提供信息的初步研究结果。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Sep;89(3):569-580. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9559-y.
6
Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment.利用互联网和社交媒体招募健康研究参与者的伦理与隐私问题:在线招募的设计即隐私框架
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 6;19(4):e104. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7029.
7
Reasons for endorsing or rejecting self-binding directives in bipolar disorder: a qualitative study of survey responses from UK service users.支持或反对双相情感障碍患者自我约束指令的原因:来自英国服务使用者调查回应的定性研究。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;8(7):599-609. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00115-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
8
[Discrimination perceived by people with a diagnosis of schizophrenic disorders. INternational study of DIscrimination and stiGma Outcomes (INDIGO): French results].[精神分裂症谱系障碍患者所感受到的歧视。歧视与耻辱结局国际研究(INDIGO):法国的研究结果]
Encephale. 2012 Jun;38(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Aug 31.
9
Facebook for Supporting a Lifestyle Intervention for People with Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar Disorder, and Schizophrenia: an Exploratory Study.脸书支持生活方式干预治疗重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症患者:一项探索性研究。
Psychiatr Q. 2018 Mar;89(1):81-94. doi: 10.1007/s11126-017-9512-0.
10
Ethical issues in using Twitter for population-level depression monitoring: a qualitative study.使用推特进行人群层面抑郁症监测中的伦理问题:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Apr 14;17:22. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0105-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Refining smart healthcare care for mental health and substance use disorders: A patient-centred, evidence-based approach.优化针对心理健康和物质使用障碍的智能医疗保健:以患者为中心的循证方法。
World J Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 19;15(6):100438. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v15.i6.100438.
2
Social networks use in the context of Schizophrenia: a review of the literature.精神分裂症背景下社交网络的应用:文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2024 May 31;15:1255073. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1255073. eCollection 2024.
3
The Relationship of Internet, Social Media, and Related Technology Use with Disease Severity and Functionality in Individuals with Serious Mental Disorders.互联网、社交媒体及相关技术的使用与严重精神障碍患者疾病严重程度和功能的关系
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2024 Feb 27;61(1):3-10. doi: 10.29399/npa.28315. eCollection 2024.
4
Sleep Quality and Self-Stigma Mediate the Association Between Problematic Use of Social Media and Quality of Life Among People With Schizophrenia in Taiwan: A Longitudinal Study.睡眠质量和自我污名化在台湾精神分裂症患者社交媒体使用问题与生活质量之间的关联中起中介作用:一项纵向研究。
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Nov;20(11):1034-1044. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0169. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
5
Digital Mental Health Interventions for Young People in Rural South Africa: Prospects and Challenges for Implementation.数字化心理健康干预在南非农村青少年中的应用:实施的前景与挑战。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 13;20(2):1453. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021453.
6
Social media and schizophrenia: An update on clinical applications.社交媒体与精神分裂症:临床应用的最新进展
World J Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 19;12(7):897-903. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v12.i7.897.
7
Insights Into Needs and Preferences for Mental Health Support on Social Media and Through Mobile Apps Among Black Male University Students: Exploratory Qualitative Study.黑人男大学生对社交媒体和移动应用心理健康支持的需求与偏好洞察:探索性定性研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Aug 31;6(8):e38716. doi: 10.2196/38716.
8
Ethical issues of collecting, storing, and analyzing geo-referenced tweets for mental health research.为心理健康研究收集、存储和分析地理定位推文的伦理问题。
Digit Health. 2022 Apr 12;8:20552076221092539. doi: 10.1177/20552076221092539. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
9
How to make online mood-monitoring in bipolar patients a success? A qualitative exploration of requirements.如何使双相情感障碍患者的在线情绪监测取得成功?对相关需求的定性探索。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Dec 1;9(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40345-021-00244-2.
10
Studies of Depression and Anxiety Using Reddit as a Data Source: Scoping Review.以Reddit为数据源的抑郁症和焦虑症研究:范围综述
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Nov 25;8(11):e29487. doi: 10.2196/29487.

本文引用的文献

1
The WorkingWell Mobile Phone App for Individuals With Serious Mental Illnesses: Proof-of-Concept, Mixed-Methods Feasibility Study.针对患有严重精神疾病个体的“工作良好”手机应用程序:概念验证、混合方法可行性研究。
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Oct 25;5(4):e11383. doi: 10.2196/11383.
2
Social media and its relationship with mood, self-esteem and paranoia in psychosis.社交媒体及其与精神病患者情绪、自尊和妄想的关系。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018 Dec;138(6):558-570. doi: 10.1111/acps.12953. Epub 2018 Sep 10.
3
Potential Benefits of Incorporating Peer-to-Peer Interactions Into Digital Interventions for Psychotic Disorders: A Systematic Review.将同伴互动纳入精神障碍数字干预措施的潜在益处:系统评价。
Psychiatr Serv. 2018 Apr 1;69(4):377-388. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201700283. Epub 2017 Dec 15.
4
Exploring opportunities to support mental health care using social media: A survey of social media users with mental illness.利用社交媒体探索支持心理健康护理的机会:一项针对患有精神疾病的社交媒体用户的调查。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;13(3):405-413. doi: 10.1111/eip.12496. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
5
Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards.数字时代的伦理导航:引入连接与开放研究伦理(CORE),一种供研究人员和机构审查委员会使用的工具。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Feb 8;19(2):e38. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6793.
6
Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.关于为精神疾病患者推荐数字技术的伦理观点。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2017 Dec;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40345-017-0073-9. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
7
Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas.严重精神障碍患者的超额死亡率:一个多层次干预框架以及临床实践、政策和研究议程的优先事项
World Psychiatry. 2017 Feb;16(1):30-40. doi: 10.1002/wps.20384.
8
Addressing the treatment gap: A key challenge for extending evidence-based psychosocial interventions.解决治疗差距:推广基于证据的心理社会干预的关键挑战。
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Jan;88:7-18. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.004.
9
How people with serious mental illness use smartphones, mobile apps, and social media.患有严重精神疾病的人如何使用智能手机、移动应用程序和社交媒体。
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2016 Dec;39(4):364-367. doi: 10.1037/prj0000207. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
10
A Pilot Study of a Peer-Group Lifestyle Intervention Enhanced With mHealth Technology and Social Media for Adults With Serious Mental Illness.一项针对患有严重精神疾病的成年人的试点研究:通过移动健康技术和社交媒体强化的同伴群体生活方式干预
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016 Jun;204(6):483-6. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000530.

社交媒体使用中的隐私风险:了解有严重精神疾病的社交媒体用户的看法。

Risks to Privacy With Use of Social Media: Understanding the Views of Social Media Users With Serious Mental Illness.

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Naslund); Department of Psychiatry, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Aschbrenner).

出版信息

Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):561-568. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800520. Epub 2019 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ps.201800520
PMID:30947635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6602849/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Social media may afford new opportunities to enhance mental health services; however, privacy risks have received less attention. This study explored privacy risks of using social media for reasons related to mental health from the perspectives of social media users with serious mental illness.

METHODS

Twitter users who self-identified in their profile as having a serious mental illness participated in an online survey inquiring whether they were ever concerned about risks to their privacy when using social media for anything related to their mental illness. User characteristics were compared between those who were concerned about risks and those who were not. Participants' responses to an open-ended question about privacy risks were analyzed thematically.

RESULTS

Among 90 respondents who self-identified as having schizophrenia spectrum disorders (40%), bipolar disorder (37%), or major depressive disorder (23%), more than one-third (36%) expressed concerns about privacy risks with using social media. Risks were more frequently reported among respondents with a college degree, compared with those without a college degree, and among respondents who were currently working or in school, compared with those who were not currently working. Thematic analysis of participants' responses to the open-ended question yielded four categories of risk: threats to employment, fear of stigma and being judged, impact on personal relationships, and facing hostility or being hurt.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer preliminary insights about the types of privacy risks that individuals with serious mental illness are concerned about when using social media for their mental health. The findings can inform the safety of future social media interventions.

摘要

目的

社交媒体可能为改善心理健康服务提供新的机会,但隐私风险却较少受到关注。本研究从患有严重精神疾病的社交媒体用户的角度探讨了使用社交媒体与心理健康相关的原因所带来的隐私风险。

方法

在自我认同患有严重精神疾病的 Twitter 用户中进行了一项在线调查,询问他们在使用社交媒体处理任何与精神疾病相关的问题时是否曾担心过隐私风险。对有风险意识和无风险意识的用户特征进行了比较。对有关隐私风险的开放式问题的回答进行了主题分析。

结果

在 90 名自我认同患有精神分裂症谱系障碍(40%)、双相情感障碍(37%)或重度抑郁症(23%)的受访者中,超过三分之一(36%)表示在使用社交媒体时担心隐私风险。与没有大学学历的受访者相比,具有大学学历的受访者更频繁地报告风险,与没有工作的受访者相比,目前正在工作或上学的受访者更频繁地报告风险。对参与者对开放式问题的回答进行的主题分析得出了四类风险:对就业的威胁、对污名化和评判的恐惧、对人际关系的影响,以及面临敌意或受到伤害。

结论

这些发现初步揭示了患有严重精神疾病的个体在使用社交媒体治疗其精神健康时所关注的隐私风险类型。这些发现可以为未来社交媒体干预措施的安全性提供信息。