Suppr超能文献

关于为精神疾病患者推荐数字技术的伦理观点。

Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness.

作者信息

Bauer Michael, Glenn Tasha, Monteith Scott, Bauer Rita, Whybrow Peter C, Geddes John

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.

ChronoRecord Association, Inc., Fullerton, CA, 92834, USA.

出版信息

Int J Bipolar Disord. 2017 Dec;5(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40345-017-0073-9. Epub 2017 Feb 7.

Abstract

The digital revolution in medicine not only offers exciting new directions for the treatment of mental illness, but also presents challenges to patient privacy and security. Changes in medicine are part of the complex digital economy based on creating value from analysis of behavioral data acquired by the tracking of daily digital activities. Without an understanding of the digital economy, recommending the use of technology to patients with mental illness can inadvertently lead to harm. Behavioral data are sold in the secondary data market, combined with other data from many sources, and used in algorithms that automatically classify people. These classifications are used in commerce and government, may be discriminatory, and result in non-medical harm to patients with mental illness. There is also potential for medical harm related to poor quality online information, self-diagnosis and self-treatment, passive monitoring, and the use of unvalidated smartphone apps. The goal of this paper is to increase awareness and foster discussion of the new ethical issues. To maximize the potential of technology to help patients with mental illness, physicians need education about the digital economy, and patients need help understanding the appropriate use and limitations of online websites and smartphone apps.

摘要

医学领域的数字革命不仅为精神疾病的治疗提供了令人兴奋的新方向,也给患者隐私和安全带来了挑战。医学变革是复杂数字经济的一部分,这种经济基于通过追踪日常数字活动获取的行为数据进行分析来创造价值。如果不了解数字经济,向精神疾病患者推荐使用技术可能会无意中造成伤害。行为数据在二级数据市场出售,与来自许多来源的其他数据相结合,并用于自动对人进行分类的算法中。这些分类被用于商业和政府领域,可能具有歧视性,并会给精神疾病患者带来非医疗伤害。与质量不佳的在线信息、自我诊断和自我治疗、被动监测以及使用未经验证的智能手机应用程序相关的医疗伤害也存在可能性。本文的目的是提高人们对这些新伦理问题的认识并促进相关讨论。为了最大限度地发挥技术帮助精神疾病患者的潜力,医生需要接受有关数字经济的教育,患者需要得到帮助以了解在线网站和智能手机应用程序的适当使用方法及局限性。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
The Future of the Psychiatrist.精神科医生的未来。
Psychiatr Res Clin Pract. 2025 Mar 27;7(2):80-90. doi: 10.1176/appi.prcp.20240130. eCollection 2025 Summer.
6
Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.数字疗法在欧洲的应用。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2024 Dec 27;20:939-954. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S489873. eCollection 2024.
7
Ethics of Wearable-Based Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection.可穿戴式院外心脏骤停检测的伦理学。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Sep;17(9):e012913. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012913. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
9
Psychotherapy, artificial intelligence and adolescents: ethical aspects.心理治疗、人工智能和青少年:伦理方面。
J Prev Med Hyg. 2024 Jan 1;64(4):E438-E442. doi: 10.15167/2421-4248/jpmh2023.64.4.3135. eCollection 2023 Dec.

本文引用的文献

2
Privacy and Security in Mobile Health: A Research Agenda.移动健康中的隐私与安全:一项研究议程。
Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2016 Jun;49(6):22-30. doi: 10.1109/MC.2016.185. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
4
ECOLOGICALLY VALID LONG-TERM MOOD MONITORING OF INDIVIDUALS WITH BIPOLAR DISORDER USING SPEECH.使用语音对双相情感障碍个体进行生态有效长期情绪监测。
Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust Speech Signal Process. 2014 May;2014:4858-4862. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2014.6854525. Epub 2014 Jul 14.
8
Balancing benefits and harms: privacy protection policies.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):969-71. doi: 10.1002/pds.4048. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
9
Scientific and ethical features of English-language online tests for Alzheimer's disease.阿尔茨海默病英语在线测试的科学与伦理特征
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015 Jul 2;1(3):281-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2015.03.004. eCollection 2015 Sep.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验