• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转移性淋巴结比率在胰腺癌中的预后价值

Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Pancreatic Cancer.

作者信息

Karaca Can A, Coker Ahmet

机构信息

1Department of General Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir University of Economics, İzmir, Turkey.

2Izmir Ekonomi Universitesi Sakarya Caddesi, No:156, 35330, Balcova, Izmir Turkey.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(1):50-54. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0824-9. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

DOI:10.1007/s13193-018-0824-9
PMID:30948872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6414569/
Abstract

Lymph node involvement in pancreatic adenocancer is one of the strongest predictors of prognosis. However, the extent of lymph node dissection is still a matter of debate and number of dissected nodes varies widely among patients. In order to homogenize this diverse group of patients and more accurately predict their prognosis, we aimed to analyze the effect of metastatic lymph node ratio as an independent prognostic factor. We retrospectively analyzed medical recordings of 326 patients with pancreatic cancer who were treated in a tertiary medical oncology center over a 10-year period. Both in univariate and multivariate analyses, metastatic lymph node ratio proved to be a strong predictor of prognosis which was unaffected from heterogeneity of our patient population and can be used to facilitate predict prognosis of patients who underwent lymph node dissection to various extents and with future studies it can emerge as a successful tool for creating prognostic subgroups of the disease.

摘要

胰腺癌中的淋巴结受累是预后的最强预测指标之一。然而,淋巴结清扫的范围仍是一个有争议的问题,且不同患者清扫的淋巴结数量差异很大。为了使这一多样化的患者群体同质化并更准确地预测他们的预后,我们旨在分析转移淋巴结比率作为独立预后因素的作用。我们回顾性分析了在一家三级肿瘤中心接受治疗的326例胰腺癌患者10年期间的医疗记录。在单变量和多变量分析中,转移淋巴结比率均被证明是预后的有力预测指标,不受我们患者群体异质性的影响,可用于促进预测不同程度接受淋巴结清扫的患者的预后,并且在未来的研究中它可能成为创建该疾病预后亚组的成功工具。

相似文献

1
Prognostic Value of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Pancreatic Cancer.转移性淋巴结比率在胰腺癌中的预后价值
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(1):50-54. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0824-9. Epub 2018 Oct 26.
2
Para-aortic node involvement is not an independent predictor of survival after resection for pancreatic cancer.主动脉旁淋巴结受累并非胰腺癌切除术后生存的独立预测因素。
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jun 28;23(24):4399-4406. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i24.4399.
3
Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph nodes ratio in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma after curative gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后胃腺癌患者转移淋巴结比率的预后意义
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(10):1874-8.
4
Preoperative serum C-reactive protein levels and post-operative lymph node ratio are important predictors of survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.术前血清C反应蛋白水平和术后淋巴结比率是胰腺导管腺癌胰十二指肠切除术后生存的重要预测指标。
JOP. 2012 Mar 10;13(2):199-204.
5
[Correlation between characteristics of lymph node metastases and prognosis in pancreatic cancer treated with pancreaticoduodenectomy].[胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺癌时淋巴结转移特征与预后的相关性]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2014 Sep;36(9):688-92.
6
[Prognostic value of metastatic lymph node ratio in gastric cancer].[胃癌中转移淋巴结比率的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Feb;15(2):137-40.
7
Degree of desmoplasia in metastatic lymph node lesions is associated with lesion size and poor prognosis in pancreatic cancer patients.
Oncol Lett. 2017 Sep;14(3):3141-3147. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6549. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?晚期胃癌的转移性淋巴结比率:比转移淋巴结数量更好的预后因素?
Int J Oncol. 2010 Jun;36(6):1461-7. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000632.
9
The ratio of metastatic/resected lymph nodes is an independent prognostic factor in patients with node-positive pancreatic head cancer.转移淋巴结与切除淋巴结的比例是淋巴结阳性胰头癌患者的独立预后因素。
Pancreas. 2006 Oct;33(3):240-5. doi: 10.1097/01.mpa.0000235306.96486.2a.
10
Prognostic significance of extranodal extension of regional lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer.甲状腺乳头状癌区域淋巴结转移的结外扩展的预后意义
Head Neck. 2015 Sep;37(9):1336-43. doi: 10.1002/hed.23747. Epub 2014 Oct 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Lymph Node Yield and Lymph Node Ratio for Prognosis of Long-Term Survival in Gastric Carcinoma.胃癌长期生存预后的淋巴结获取数量及淋巴结比率
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;17(3):414. doi: 10.3390/cancers17030414.
2
Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in advanced gallbladder carcinoma with at least 6 lymph nodes retrieved.对于至少检出 6 枚淋巴结的晚期胆囊癌,转移淋巴结比率是一个重要的预后因素。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Sep 28;408(1):382. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03119-5.
3
Total Neoadjuvant Treatment for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated With Limited Lymph Node Yield but Improved Ratio.全新辅助治疗胰腺导管腺癌与淋巴结获取量有限相关,但改善了比例。
J Surg Res. 2022 Dec;280:543-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Sep 9.
4
Prediction scores of postoperative liver metastasis and long-term survival of pancreatic head cancer based on the distance between the mesenteric vessels and tumor, preoperative serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, and lymph node metastasis rate.基于肠系膜血管与肿瘤之间的距离、术前血清糖类抗原 19-9 水平和淋巴结转移率预测胰头癌术后肝转移和长期生存的评分。
Cancer Med. 2023 Jan;12(2):1064-1078. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4957. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
The role of lymph node status in cancer-specific survival and decision-making of postoperative radiotherapy in poorly differentiated thyroid cancer: a population-based study.淋巴结状态在低分化甲状腺癌的癌症特异性生存及术后放疗决策中的作用:一项基于人群的研究
Am J Transl Res. 2021 Jan 15;13(1):383-390. eCollection 2021.
6
Multivisceral resection for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic body and tail-a retrospective single-center analysis.胰体尾腺癌的多脏器切除术——一项单中心回顾性分析
World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Aug 20;18(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01973-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution and impact of lymph node dissection during pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌胰十二指肠切除术中淋巴结清扫的演变与影响
Surgery. 2017 Apr;161(4):968-976. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.09.032. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
2
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor for patients after resection of pancreatic cancer.淋巴结比率是胰腺癌切除术后患者的独立预后因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar 13;13:105. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0510-0.
3
Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS).胰腺导管腺癌手术中标准淋巴结清扫术的定义:国际胰腺手术研究组(ISGPS)的共识声明
Surgery. 2014 Sep;156(3):591-600. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
4
N0/N1, PNL, or LNR? The effect of lymph node number on accurate survival prediction in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.N0/N1、PNL 还是 LNR?淋巴结数量对胰腺导管腺癌准确生存预测的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2013 Feb;17(2):257-66. doi: 10.1007/s11605-012-1974-7. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
5
Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.无论检查的淋巴结数量多少,淋巴结比率都是可切除(R0)胃癌患者的独立预后因素。
Am J Clin Oncol. 2013 Aug;36(4):325-30. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318246b4e9.
6
Metastatic lymph node ratio as an important prognostic factor in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.淋巴结转移率是胰腺导管腺癌的一个重要预后因素。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Apr;38(4):333-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.020. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric carcinoma: a better prognostic factor than number of metastatic lymph nodes?晚期胃癌的转移性淋巴结比率:比转移淋巴结数量更好的预后因素?
Int J Oncol. 2010 Jun;36(6):1461-7. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000632.
8
The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer.淋巴结比率是胰腺癌切除术后最强的预后因素。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Jul;13(7):1337-44. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0919-2. Epub 2009 May 6.
9
Surgical treatment of resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: expert consensus statement by Evans et al.可切除及交界可切除胰腺癌的外科治疗:埃文斯等人的专家共识声明
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1745-50. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0410-z. Epub 2009 Apr 24.
10
Surgical treatment of pancreatic cancer.胰腺癌的外科治疗
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Sep;1138:169-80. doi: 10.1196/annals.1414.024.