• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮腰椎间盘切除术和经皮椎间盘骨水泥成形术治疗 60 岁以上腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛疗效和安全性。

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy and Percutaneous Disc Cementoplasty for Painful Lumbar Disc Herniation in Patients over 60 Years.

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, No. 600 Yishan Road, Shanghai 200233, China.

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Department of Orthopedics, Dandong Center Hospital, Liaoning, China.

出版信息

J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Apr 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.018
PMID:30952522
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of percutaneous lumbar discectomy (PLD) and percutaneous disc cementoplasty (PDCP) for painful lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients >60 years of age.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixteen older patients (mean age, 71.00 ± 6.24 years) with painful LDH were treated with PLD and PDCP. The outcome data (the Macnab criteria, visual analog scale score, and Oswestry disability index) were collected preoperatively; at 1 week postoperatively; at posttreatment months 1, 3, and 6; and every 6 months thereafter. In addition, treatment duration, injection volume of bone cement, length of hospital stay, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Treatment was successful in all patients. The pain relief rate at the last follow-up was 87.5%. Six, 8, and 2 patients showed excellent, good, and fair results, respectively; no patient showed a poor result. The average visual analog scale for back and leg pain decreased from 6.75 ± 1.06 and 7.00 ± 0.89 before the procedure to 2.81 ± 1.60 and 2.87 ± 1.75 at 1 month, 2.79 ± 1.58 and 2.71 ± 1.64 at 6 months, and 2.90 ± 1.73 and 3.00 ± 1.76 at 1 year, respectively. The scores were 2.44 ± 1.63 and 2.44 ± 1.71, respectively, at the last follow-up. The Oswestry disability index also changed after the procedure, with significant differences between baseline scores and those at each follow-up (P < .001). The mean procedure duration, injection volume of bone cement, and length of hospital stay were 55.69 ± 5.86 minutes, 2.50 ± 0.63 mL, and 7.06 ± 2.41 days, respectively. There were no complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PLD and PDCP is feasible, safe, and effective for older patients with painful LDH.

摘要

目的

评估经皮腰椎间盘切除术(PLD)联合经皮椎间盘骨水泥成形术(PDCP)治疗 60 岁以上伴疼痛的腰椎间盘突出症(LDH)患者的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

对 16 例 60 岁以上伴疼痛的 LDH 患者行 PLD 联合 PDCP 治疗。术前、术后 1 周、治疗后 1、3、6 个月及此后每 6 个月收集 Macnab 标准、视觉模拟评分(VAS)和 Oswestry 功能障碍指数(ODI)等疗效数据。同时评估手术时间、骨水泥注射量、住院时间和并发症。

结果

所有患者均获得成功治疗。末次随访时,疼痛缓解率为 87.5%。6、8、2 例患者的疗效分别为优、良、可,无一例差。VAS 评分腰背疼痛分别由术前的 6.75±1.06、7.00±0.89 降至术后 1 个月的 2.81±1.60、2.87±1.75,术后 6 个月的 2.79±1.58、2.71±1.64,术后 1 年的 2.90±1.73、3.00±1.76,末次随访时分别为 2.44±1.63、2.44±1.71。ODI 评分术后亦有改善,与术前相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.001)。手术时间、骨水泥注射量、住院时间分别为 55.69±5.86min、2.50±0.63mL、7.06±2.41d。无并发症发生。

结论

PLD 联合 PDCP 治疗 60 岁以上伴疼痛的 LDH 患者是可行、安全且有效的。

相似文献

1
Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy and Percutaneous Disc Cementoplasty for Painful Lumbar Disc Herniation in Patients over 60 Years.经皮腰椎间盘切除术和经皮椎间盘骨水泥成形术治疗 60 岁以上腰椎间盘突出症患者的疼痛疗效和安全性。
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019 Jun;30(6):894-899. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.018. Epub 2019 Apr 2.
2
Feasibility of Percutaneous Lumbar Discectomy Combined with Percutaneous Cementoplasty for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Type I Endplate Changes.经皮腰椎间盘切除术联合经皮骨水泥成形术治疗伴有Modic I型终板改变的症状性腰椎间盘突出症的可行性
Pain Physician. 2017 May;20(4):E481-E488.
3
Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy, microendoscopic discectomy, and microdiscectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation: minimum 2-year follow-up results.经皮内镜下经椎间孔椎间盘切除术、显微内镜下椎间盘切除术和显微椎间盘切除术治疗症状性腰椎间盘突出症的比较:至少2年的随访结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):317-325. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.SPINE172. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
4
Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic discectomy for recurrent lumbar disc herniation.显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症后的临床疗效
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Feb;23(1):30-4. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318193c16c.
5
Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy compared with microendoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: 1-year results of an ongoing randomized controlled trial.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术与显微内镜下椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的比较:一项正在进行的随机对照试验的1年结果
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Mar;28(3):300-310. doi: 10.3171/2017.7.SPINE161434. Epub 2018 Jan 5.
6
Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation with Modic Changes via a Transforaminal Approach: A Retrospective Study.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴有 Modic 改变的腰椎间盘突出症:一项回顾性研究。
Pain Physician. 2019 Nov;22(6):E601-E608.
7
Analysis of the Characteristics and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Upper Lumbar Disc Herniation.经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗上位腰椎间盘突出症的特点及临床疗效分析。
World Neurosurg. 2016 Aug;92:142-147. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.04.127. Epub 2016 May 7.
8
Short-term clinical efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in treating young patients with lumbar disc herniation.经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗青年腰椎间盘突出症的短期临床疗效
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 20;13(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0759-4.
9
Transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcome, prognostic factors, and technical consideration.经椎间孔后路腰椎间盘镜手术治疗上位腰椎间盘突出症:临床疗效、预后因素及技术要点
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009 Mar;151(3):199-206. doi: 10.1007/s00701-009-0204-x. Epub 2009 Feb 20.
10
Changes in back pain after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and annuloplasty for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective study.经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术和环锯成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症后腰痛的变化:一项前瞻性研究。
Pain Med. 2011 Nov;12(11):1615-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2011.01250.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Biomechanical Behavior of Injected Cement Spacers versus Traditional Cages in Low-Density Lumbar Spine under Compression Loading.注射型水泥间隔物与传统型椎间融合器在低密度腰椎骨受压下的生物力学行为比较。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jul 17;60(7):1155. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071155.
2
Finite element analysis of biomechanical effects of percutaneous cement discoplasty in scoliosis.经皮骨水泥椎间盘成形术治疗脊柱侧凸的生物力学效应的有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Apr 12;25(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06741-y.
3
Critical Review of the State-of-the-Art on Lumbar Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty.
腰椎经皮水泥椎间盘成形术的最新技术现状批判性综述
Front Surg. 2022 May 10;9:902831. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.902831. eCollection 2022.