Suppr超能文献

高危儿童语言发展路径:定性比较分析(QCA)。

Paths to language development in at risk children: a qualitative comparative analysis (QCA).

机构信息

School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Pediatr. 2019 Apr 5;19(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1449-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Childhood language development is related to long term educational, employment, health and social outcomes. Previous research identifies a complex range of risk and protective factors which result in good and poor language outcomes for children, however children at risk are an underrepresented group in these studies. Our aim is to investigate the combinations of factors (paths) that result in good and poor language outcomes for a group of 5 year old children of mothers experiencing adversity.

METHODS

This mixed methods study utilised longitudinal data from a randomised control trial of sustained home visiting (MECSH) to determine the language outcomes in at risk children. Mothers were randomly assigned to a comparison group at entry to the study (prior to child's birth). Their children who were retained at entry to school completed language assessments (n = 41) and were participants in this study. Influence of 13 key factors derived from the extant literature that impact language development were explored. Regression was used to determine the six key factors of influence and these were used in the Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). QCA was employed to examine the necessary and sufficient conditions and paths affecting language development linked to good and poor language outcomes. A post hoc analysis of the risk and protective paths to good and poor language outcomes was also conducted.

RESULTS

Thirteen distinct pathways led to good language outcomes and four paths to poor language outcomes in five year old at risk children. A variety of condition combinations resulted in these outcomes, with maternal responsivity, toddler development and number of children in the home being key. High and low maternal education influenced both good and poor language development.

CONCLUSIONS

The paths to good and poor language outcomes were different and complex. Most paths to a good language outcome involved protective factors, though not always. In addition, paths to poor language more often involved risk factors. The varied patterns of risk and protective factors point to the need for interventions across the first five years of life in both health and education for families which can respond to these risk and protective patterns.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The original RCT was retrospectively registered in the ANCTR: ACTRN12608000473369 .

摘要

背景

儿童语言发展与其长期的教育、就业、健康和社会成果息息相关。先前的研究确定了一系列复杂的风险和保护因素,这些因素导致了儿童良好和不良的语言发展结果,但在这些研究中,处于风险中的儿童是代表性不足的群体。我们的目的是研究一组经历逆境的母亲的 5 岁儿童的各种因素(路径)组合,这些因素导致了他们良好和不良的语言发展结果。

方法

这项混合方法研究利用了一项持续家庭探访(MECSH)的随机对照试验的纵向数据,以确定处于风险中的儿童的语言发展结果。母亲在进入研究(在孩子出生之前)时被随机分配到一个对照组。他们在进入学校时保留下来的孩子(n=41)完成了语言评估,并成为了这项研究的参与者。研究探讨了 13 个从现有文献中得出的影响语言发展的关键因素。回归用于确定 6 个关键影响因素,这些因素用于定性比较分析(QCA)。QCA 用于研究与良好和不良语言发展结果相关的语言发展的必要和充分条件及路径。还对良好和不良语言结果的风险和保护路径进行了事后分析。

结果

在有风险的 5 岁儿童中,有 13 条不同的路径导致了良好的语言发展结果,4 条路径导致了不良的语言发展结果。这些结果涉及多种条件组合,其中母亲的反应能力、幼儿的发展和家中孩子的数量是关键因素。母亲的高和低教育水平都影响了良好和不良的语言发展。

结论

良好和不良语言发展结果的路径是不同且复杂的。大多数通往良好语言发展结果的路径都涉及保护因素,但并非总是如此。此外,通往不良语言发展的路径往往涉及风险因素。这些不同的风险和保护因素模式表明,需要在健康和教育领域为家庭提供从出生到五岁的干预措施,这些措施可以对这些风险和保护模式做出反应。

试验注册

原始 RCT 在 ANCTR 中进行了回顾性注册:ACTRN12608000473369 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a61f/6449893/045cce4d470d/12887_2019_1449_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验