• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保乳术后即刻乳房重建的适应证变化和长期肿瘤学结果。

Evolving indications and long-term oncological outcomes of risk-reducing bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy.

机构信息

Breast Services Division, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.

Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Cleveland Ohio USA.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2018 Nov 26;3(2):169-173. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50117. eCollection 2019 Apr.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50117
PMID:30957063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6433310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is a technically feasible operation and is associated with excellent cosmetic outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in patient characteristics, indications for surgery and long-term outcomes of bilateral NSM for breast cancer risk reduction over time.

METHODS

A review of a single-centre experience with bilateral NSM performed between 2001 and 2017 for breast cancer risk reduction in patients without breast cancer was performed. Trends in patient characteristics and indications for surgery were evaluated over four time intervals: 2001-2005, 2006-2009, 2010-2013 and 2014-2017. Statistical analysis was performed using χ tests.

RESULTS

Over the study period, 272 NSMs were performed in 136 patients; their median age was 41 years. The number of bilateral NSMs performed increased over time. The most common indication was a mutation in breast cancer-associated genes (104 patients, 76·5 per cent), which included (62 patients), (35), (2), (3) and (2). Other indications were family history of breast cancer (19 patients, 14·0 per cent), lobular carcinoma (10, 7·4 per cent) and a history of mantle irradiation (3, 2·2 per cent). The proportion of patients having a bilateral NSM for mutation in a breast cancer-associated gene increased over time (2001-2005: 2 of 12; 2006-2009: 9 of 17; 2010-2013: 34 of 41; 2014-2017: 61 of 66;  < 0·001). Mean follow-up was 53 months; no breast cancers were found during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The use of bilateral NSM for breast cancer risk reduction is increasing and the indications have evolved over the past 16 years. These excellent long-term oncological results suggest that bilateral NSM is a good option for surgical breast cancer risk reduction.

摘要

背景

双侧保留乳头的乳房切除术(NSM)是一种技术上可行的手术,与极佳的美容效果相关。本研究的目的是评估随着时间的推移,双侧 NSM 用于降低乳腺癌风险的患者特征、手术指征和长期结果的趋势。

方法

对 2001 年至 2017 年间因乳腺癌风险降低而在无乳腺癌患者中进行的单侧 NSM 经验进行了单中心回顾。评估了四个时间段内(2001-2005 年、2006-2009 年、2010-2013 年和 2014-2017 年)患者特征和手术指征的趋势。使用 χ 检验进行统计分析。

结果

研究期间,136 例患者共行 272 例双侧 NSM,中位年龄为 41 岁。双侧 NSM 的数量随时间推移而增加。最常见的指征是乳腺癌相关基因的突变(104 例,76.5%),包括 (62 例)、 (35 例)、 (2 例)、 (3 例)和 (2 例)。其他指征包括乳腺癌家族史(19 例,14.0%)、小叶癌 (10 例,7.4%)和胸壁放疗史(3 例,2.2%)。具有乳腺癌相关基因突变的双侧 NSM 患者比例随时间推移而增加(2001-2005 年:2/12;2006-2009 年:9/17;2010-2013 年:34/41;2014-2017 年:61/66;  < 0·001)。中位随访时间为 53 个月;随访期间未发现乳腺癌。

结论

双侧 NSM 用于降低乳腺癌风险的应用正在增加,并且在过去 16 年中指征已经发生了演变。这些极佳的长期肿瘤学结果表明,双侧 NSM 是一种降低乳腺癌风险的良好手术选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be30/6433310/0c2b3c0d534b/BJS5-3-169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be30/6433310/0c2b3c0d534b/BJS5-3-169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/be30/6433310/0c2b3c0d534b/BJS5-3-169-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolving indications and long-term oncological outcomes of risk-reducing bilateral nipple-sparing mastectomy.保乳术后即刻乳房重建的适应证变化和长期肿瘤学结果。
BJS Open. 2018 Nov 26;3(2):169-173. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50117. eCollection 2019 Apr.
2
Use of bilateral prophylactic nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with high risk of breast cancer.双侧预防性保乳乳房切除术在高危乳腺癌患者中的应用。
Br J Surg. 2020 Sep;107(10):1307-1312. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11616. Epub 2020 May 20.
3
Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study.BRCA 突变人群中预防性保乳乳房切除术的肿瘤安全性:一项多机构研究。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):123-129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422.
4
Risk-reducing mastectomy: a case series of 124 procedures in Brazilian patients.降低风险的乳房切除术:124 例巴西患者的病例系列。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 May;181(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05582-w. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
5
Patient Satisfaction and Nipple-Areola Sensitivity After Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Immediate Implant Breast Reconstruction in a High Breast Cancer Risk Population: Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy Versus Skin-Sparing Mastectomy.高乳腺癌风险人群双侧预防性乳房切除术后即刻植入式乳房重建的患者满意度及乳头乳晕敏感性:保留乳头乳房切除术与保留皮肤乳房切除术的比较
Ann Plast Surg. 2016 Aug;77(2):145-52. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000366.
6
Nipple-sparing bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate reconstruction with TiLoop Bra mesh in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers: A prospective study of long-term and patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.BRCA1/2 突变携带者中使用 TiLoop Bra 网片行保留乳头的双侧预防性乳房切除术和即刻重建:使用 BREAST-Q 评估长期和患者报告结局的前瞻性研究。
Breast. 2018 Jun;39:8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Feb 18.
7
Nipple-sparing mastectomy as treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ: A 10-year follow-up study.保留乳头的乳房切除术治疗导管原位癌患者:一项10年随访研究。
Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):298-303. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12947. Epub 2017 Nov 15.
8
Systematic review of therapeutic nipple-sparing skin-sparing mastectomy.保留乳头的乳腺切除术的系统评价。
BJS Open. 2018 Dec 19;3(2):135-145. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50119. eCollection 2019 Apr.
9
Nipple-sparing and skin-sparing mastectomy: Review of aims, oncological safety and contraindications.保留乳头和皮肤的乳房切除术:目的、肿瘤安全性和禁忌证的综述。
Breast. 2017 Aug;34 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S82-S84. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.06.034. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
10
How Protective are Nipple-Sparing Prophylactic Mastectomies in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers?BRCA1 和 BRCA2 突变携带者中保留乳头的预防性乳房切除术的保护作用如何?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(10):5657-5662. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10445-9. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Oncoplastic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Immediate Reconstruction in Non-ideal Candidates.非理想候选者的肿瘤整形保乳乳房切除术及即刻乳房重建术
Cureus. 2025 Aug 15;17(8):e90157. doi: 10.7759/cureus.90157. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.外科肿瘤学会乳腺疾病部位工作组关于双侧降低风险乳房切除术的声明:适应症、结果和风险
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Feb;32(2):899-911. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16484-2. Epub 2024 Nov 13.
3
Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Risk-Reducing Mastectomy in BRCA Mutation Carriers: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

本文引用的文献

1
A Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Conventional Mastectomy with Reconstruction.保乳术后与传统乳房切除术及重建术后患者报告结局的比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Oct;25(10):2909-2916. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6585-4. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
2
Impact of Multigene Panel Testing on Surgical Decision Making in Breast Cancer Patients.多基因面板检测对乳腺癌患者手术决策的影响。
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.037. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
3
Oncological safety of nipple-sparing prophylactic mastectomy: A review of the literature on 3716 cases.
BRCA 突变携带者行降低风险乳房切除术后的植入物乳房重建:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 13;11(12):1741. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121741.
4
Nipple margin assessment at the time of nipple-sparing mastectomy.保留乳头的乳房切除术时的乳头边缘评估。
Can J Surg. 2023 May 24;66(3):E298-E303. doi: 10.1503/cjs.001922. Print 2023 May-Jun.
5
Management of early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: recommendations of a panel of experts from the Brazilian Society of Mastology.早期三阴性乳腺癌的管理:巴西乳腺外科学会专家组的建议。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Nov 22;22(1):1201. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10250-x.
6
Health-Related Quality of Life After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy: Results From the INSPIRE Registry.保乳术后的健康相关生活质量:INSPIRE 注册研究结果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Mar;29(3):1722-1734. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10930-1. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
7
ASO Author Reflections: Is Cefazolin Enough with Implant Reconstruction? Does Retaining the Nipple Make a Difference?ASO作者反思:植入物重建时头孢唑林是否足够?保留乳头有影响吗?
Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Dec;29(Suppl 3):554-555. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10607-9. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
8
Risk Management for mutation carriers without and with breast cancer.无乳腺癌和有乳腺癌的突变携带者的风险管理。
Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2020 Jun;12(2):66-74. doi: 10.1007/s12609-019-00350-2. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
9
Risk-reducing mastectomy: a case series of 124 procedures in Brazilian patients.降低风险的乳房切除术:124 例巴西患者的病例系列。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 May;181(1):69-75. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05582-w. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
保留乳头的预防性乳房切除术的肿瘤学安全性:对3716例病例的文献综述
Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2018 Jun;63(3):e6-e13. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2017.09.005. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
4
Oncologic Safety of Prophylactic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in a Population With BRCA Mutations: A Multi-institutional Study.BRCA 突变人群中预防性保乳乳房切除术的肿瘤安全性:一项多机构研究。
JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):123-129. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.3422.
5
Nipple-sparing Mastectomy for the Management of Recurrent Breast Cancer.保留乳头的乳房切除术治疗复发性乳腺癌
Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Jul;17(4):e209-e213. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2016.10.011. Epub 2017 Jan 9.
6
Experience with Bilateral Risk-Reducing Mastectomy for an Unaffected BRCA Mutation Carrier.未受影响的BRCA突变携带者双侧预防性乳房切除术的经验。
J Breast Cancer. 2016 Jun;19(2):218-21. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2016.19.2.218. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
7
Oncologic Outcomes After Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.保留乳头的乳房切除术后的肿瘤学结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3221-5. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5366-1. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
8
Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations.中等 penetrance 癌症易感性突变的咨询框架。 (注:这里“penetrance”在医学遗传学中有“外显率”的意思,但根据你要求不添加解释,所以直接保留英文术语)
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep;13(9):581-8. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.90. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
9
Bi-pedicle nipple-sparing mastectomy (modified Letterman technique) and TIGR mesh-assisted immediate implant reconstruction, in a patient with Cowden syndrome.双蒂保留乳头乳房切除术(改良Letterman技术)及TIGR网片辅助即刻乳房重建术,用于一名考登综合征患者。
Gland Surg. 2016 Jun;5(3):306-11. doi: 10.21037/gs.2015.12.01.
10
Psychosocial and Sexual Well-Being Following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy and Reconstruction.保留乳头的乳房切除与重建术后的心理社会及性健康状况
Breast J. 2016 Jan-Feb;22(1):10-7. doi: 10.1111/tbj.12542.