Zarei Mostafa, Abbasi Hamed, Daneshjoo Abdolhamid, Gheitasi Mehdi, Johari Kamran, Faude Oliver, Rommers Nikki, Rössler Roland
Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2020 Jan 1;15(1):25-30. doi: 10.1123/ijspp.2018-0827.
The "11+ Kids" injury-prevention program has been shown to reduce injuries and related costs in youth football players less than 14 y of age. A major argument to convince coaches to use this exercise-based injury-prevention program is a potential performance enhancement of the players. Therefore, this study investigated the effects of the "11+ Kids" program on isokinetic strength.
Two teams were randomly assigned to the intervention and control groups. The intervention group replaced their warm-up by the "11+ Kids" and the control group warmed up as usual. Two days before and after the 10-wk intervention, isokinetic strength of the hip adductors and abductors, knee flexors and extensors, and ankle invertors and evertors was tested.
Thirty-one players (mean age 11.5 [0.8] y) completed the study. The intervention group showed large improvements in all isokinetic strength measures (P < .001 for all measures; Cohen d = 0.8-1.4), whereas the control group only showed negligible to medium positive effects (P values ranging from .006 to .718; Cohen d = -0.1 to 0.7). The intervention was beneficial compared with the control group regarding isokinetic strength of the hip adductors (P < .001), knee flexors (P = .002), and ankle evertors (P < .001) and invertors (P = .005).
Given the relatively short intervention period of 10 wk, the observed improvements relate to a practically meaningful effect of the intervention. The gain in strength may improve players' performance and may contribute to a reduction of injury risk in the long-term application.
“11 + 儿童”损伤预防计划已被证明可减少14岁以下青少年足球运动员的损伤及相关费用。说服教练使用这种基于运动的损伤预防计划的一个主要理由是该计划可能会提高运动员的表现。因此,本研究调查了“11 + 儿童”计划对等速肌力的影响。
将两支球队随机分为干预组和对照组。干预组用“11 + 儿童”计划取代其热身活动,对照组则照常进行热身。在为期10周的干预前后两天,测试髋内收肌和外展肌、膝屈肌和伸肌以及踝内翻肌和外翻肌的等速肌力。
31名运动员(平均年龄11.5 [0.8]岁)完成了研究。干预组在所有等速肌力测量指标上均有显著改善(所有指标P < .001;科恩d值 = 0.8 - 1.4),而对照组仅显示出可忽略不计到中等程度的积极影响(P值范围为.006至.718;科恩d值 = -0.1至0.7)。与对照组相比,干预组在髋内收肌(P < .001)、膝屈肌(P = .002)、踝外翻肌(P < .001)和内翻肌(P = .005)的等速肌力方面更有益。
鉴于干预期相对较短,仅10周,观察到的改善与干预的实际有意义效果相关。力量的增加可能会提高运动员的表现,并可能有助于在长期应用中降低受伤风险。