National Center for Tuberculosis Control and Prevention, China Center for Disease Control (CDC), Beijing, China.
International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease (The Union), South-East Asia Office, New Delhi, India.
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0214943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214943. eCollection 2019.
China's national tuberculosis programme does not have cohort wise information regarding attrition and delays in the multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) diagnosis and treatment pathway.
Under the Global Fund programmatic management of drug-resistant TB (2006-13), we assessed the attrition and delay in the pathway and the factors associated.
Cohort study involving secondary programme data. All patients identified as presumptive MDR-TB (defined as i) previously treated TB patients which included recurrent TB, return after loss to follow up, treatment after failure and ii) new TB patients that were non-converters at three months of treatment or in close contact with a known MDR-TB patient) during October 2006 to June 2013 were eligible for phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST). Pre-diagnosis attrition (presumptive MDR-TB not undergoing culture and DST) and pre-treatment attrition (confirmed MDR-TB patients not initiated on treatment) was calculated. Diagnosis delay was the time interval from DST eligibility to DST result, treatment initiation delay was fom DST result to treatment initiation and total delay was from DST eligbility to treatment initiation. Factors associated with attrition and delay were identified using log binomial regression and linear regression, respectively.
Of 78 564 presumptive MDR-TB patients, 2 470 (3.1%) underwent pre-diagnosis attrition. Of 9 283 MDR-TB patients, 3 361 (36.2%) underwent pre-treatment attrition. Median(IQR) diagnosis delay was 84 (64, 114) days; treatment initation delay was 23(6,68) days and total delay was 117(77,187) days. Long diagnosis delay was an independent predictor of pre-treatment attrition in a dose response relationship. While pre-treatment attrition was less likely among presumptive criterion 'previously treated' and with increasing time period, it was more likey among elderly and in east and west region. While the diagnosis delay increased with time period, treatment initiation delay and total delay reduced with time period. Short diagnosis delay was associated with west region, smear negative patients and presumptive criterion 'treatment after lost to follow up'. Short treatment initiation delay was associatied with east and west regions while long treatment initiation delay was associated with elderly and presumptive criterion 'recurrent TB'. Total delay predictors were similar to treatment initiation delay. In addition, short total delay was associated with presumptive criterion 'treatment after failure'.
The diagnosis and treatment delay were long and the pre-treatment attrition was considerable high. Long diagnosis delay is likely to predict pre-treatment attrition.
中国的国家结核病规划没有关于耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)诊断和治疗途径中损耗和延迟的队列信息。
在全球基金耐药结核病方案管理(2006-13 年)下,我们评估了途径中的损耗和延迟及其相关因素。
涉及次级规划数据的队列研究。所有被确定为疑似耐多药结核病的患者(定义为 i)以前接受过结核病治疗的患者,包括复发结核病、失访后返回、治疗失败后和 ii)新结核病患者,在治疗三个月时未转化或与已知耐多药结核病患者有密切接触)在 2006 年 10 月至 2013 年 6 月期间有资格进行表型药敏试验(DST)。计算了预诊断损耗(疑似耐多药结核病未进行培养和 DST)和治疗前损耗(确诊耐多药结核病患者未开始治疗)。诊断延迟是从 DST 合格到 DST 结果的时间间隔,治疗开始延迟是从 DST 结果到治疗开始的时间间隔,总延迟是从 DST 合格到治疗开始的时间间隔。使用对数二项回归和线性回归分别确定与损耗和延迟相关的因素。
在 78564 例疑似耐多药结核病患者中,2470 例(3.1%)发生了预诊断损耗。在 9283 例耐多药结核病患者中,3361 例(36.2%)发生了治疗前损耗。中位(IQR)诊断延迟为 84(64,114)天;治疗开始延迟为 23(6,68)天,总延迟为 117(77,187)天。长诊断延迟与治疗前损耗呈剂量反应关系,是治疗前损耗的独立预测因素。虽然随着时间的推移,疑似标准“以前治疗过”和时间间隔的增加,治疗前损耗的可能性较小,但在老年人和东部和西部地区更常见。随着时间的推移,诊断延迟增加,而治疗开始延迟和总延迟减少。短诊断延迟与西部地区、痰涂片阴性患者和疑似标准“治疗后失访”有关。短治疗开始延迟与东部和西部地区有关,而长治疗开始延迟与老年人和疑似标准“复发性结核病”有关。总延迟的预测因素与治疗开始延迟相似。此外,短总延迟与疑似标准“治疗失败后”有关。
诊断和治疗延迟时间长,治疗前损耗相当高。长诊断延迟可能预测治疗前损耗。