• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规钢板固定与微创改良经皮椎弓根螺钉-棒固定治疗骨盆前环骨折。

Conventional plate fixation versus minimally invasive modified pedicle screw-rod fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.

School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei City, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0215233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215233. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0215233
PMID:30958869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6453462/
Abstract

There are various methods of fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures. We report our experience with modified pedicle screw-rod fixation (MPSRF) via a minimally invasive method. Fourteen patients with anterior pelvic ring fracture were treated by internal fixation (conventional plate fixation, n = 7; MPSRF, n = 7). Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, post-operative fracture reduction grading by radiography, and complication rates were compared and statistically analyzed. Patients treated with MPSRF had a shorter operative time (-36 min, P = 0.378) and significantly less blood loss (-264 ml, P = 0.026) than patients in the conventional plate fixation group. Postoperative radiological evaluations were similar between the groups (P > 0.05). The complication rate was lower in the MPSRF group (1/7 patients) than in the plate fixation group (2/7 patients). Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation is a viable treatment for anterior pelvic ring fixation and can reduce blood loss.

摘要

对于骨盆前环骨折有多种固定方法。我们报告了一种微创改良经皮椎弓根螺钉-棒固定(MPSRF)的经验。14 例骨盆前环骨折患者接受内固定治疗(常规钢板固定 7 例,MPSRF 7 例)。比较并统计分析了术中出血量、手术时间、术后 X 线骨折复位分级和并发症发生率。MPSRF 组的手术时间明显缩短(-36 分钟,P=0.378),术中出血量明显减少(-264 毫升,P=0.026)。两组术后影像学评估无显著差异(P>0.05)。MPSRF 组的并发症发生率(1/7 例)低于钢板固定组(2/7 例)。改良经皮椎弓根螺钉-棒固定是治疗骨盆前环骨折的一种可行方法,可减少出血量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/933f0898e29d/pone.0215233.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/fdbaa10b5076/pone.0215233.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/293b8abf9b5d/pone.0215233.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/933f0898e29d/pone.0215233.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/fdbaa10b5076/pone.0215233.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/293b8abf9b5d/pone.0215233.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4352/6453462/933f0898e29d/pone.0215233.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Conventional plate fixation versus minimally invasive modified pedicle screw-rod fixation for anterior pelvic ring fractures.常规钢板固定与微创改良经皮椎弓根螺钉-棒固定治疗骨盆前环骨折。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0215233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215233. eCollection 2019.
2
Minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring injuries with modified pedicle screw-rod fixation: a retrospective study.改良椎弓根螺钉-棒固定微创治疗骨盆前环损伤:一项回顾性研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Sep 17;13(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0945-4.
3
Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation as a minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an initial case series.改良椎弓根螺钉-棒固定术作为骨盆前环损伤的微创治疗:初步病例系列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jun 6;12(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0590-3.
4
Minimally invasive stabilisation of posterior pelvic ring instabilities with pedicle screws connected to a transverse rod.使用连接至横向杆的椎弓根螺钉对骨盆后环不稳定进行微创稳定固定。
Int Orthop. 2018 Mar;42(3):681-686. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3714-9. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
5
Modified pedicle screw-rod versus anterior subcutaneous internal pelvic fixation for unstable anterior pelvic ring fracture: a retrospective study and finite element analysis.改良椎弓根螺钉-棒与前路皮下骨盆内固定治疗不稳定型骨盆前环骨折:回顾性研究和有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jul 27;16(1):467. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02618-9.
6
Minimally invasive internal fixator for unstable pelvic ring injuries with a pedicle screw-rod system: a retrospective study of 23 patients after 13.5 months.带椎弓根螺钉棒系统的微创内固定器治疗不稳定骨盆环损伤:23例患者13.5个月后的回顾性研究
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019 Apr;139(4):489-496. doi: 10.1007/s00402-018-3094-7. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
7
Robot-assisted Minimally-invasive Internal Fixation of Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Single-center Experience.机器人辅助微创骨盆环损伤内固定术:单中心经验
Orthop Surg. 2019 Feb;11(1):42-51. doi: 10.1111/os.12423. Epub 2019 Feb 3.
8
Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation versus anterior pelvic external fixation for the management of anterior pelvic ring fractures: a comparative study.改良椎弓根螺钉-棒固定术与前路骨盆外固定术治疗骨盆前环骨折的比较研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Dec 1;12(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0688-7.
9
Treatment of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Fracture with Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixator Versus Locking Compression Plate: A Comparative Study.椎弓根螺钉棒固定器与锁定加压钢板治疗不稳定型骨盆后环骨折的对比研究
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Oct 17;22:3764-3770. doi: 10.12659/msm.900673.
10
[Comparison of different minimally invasive internal fixation in the treatment of pelvic anterior ring fracture].不同微创内固定治疗骨盆前环骨折的比较
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2020 Nov 25;33(11):1042-7. doi: 10.12200/j.issn.1003-0034.2020.11.011.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior minimal invasive internal fixator versus open plating in treatment of unstable pelvic ring injuries.前路微创内固定器与切开钢板内固定治疗不稳定骨盆环损伤的对比
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 9;145(1):282. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05891-z.
2
Comparative Analysis of Surgery Using Combined Iliac Lumbar and Posterior Closed Screws for Pelvic Stability Maintenance.使用联合髂腰螺钉和后路闭合螺钉维持骨盆稳定性的手术对比分析
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Mar 2;31:e946690. doi: 10.12659/MSM.946690.
3
Iatrogenic nerve injury following pelvic ring injury: a network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Subcutaneous internal anterior fixation of pelvis fractures-which configuration of the InFix is clinically optimal?-a retrospective study.骨盆骨折的皮下内置前固定术-哪种 InFix 构型在临床上是最佳的?一项回顾性研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 Sep;43(9):2161-2166. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4110-9. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
2
Anterior Subcutaneous Internal Pelvic Fixation/INFIX: A Systemic Review.前皮下盆腔内固定/INFIX:系统评价。
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Sep;32 Suppl 6:S24-S30. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001248.
3
Conventional plate fixation method versus pre-operative virtual simulation and three-dimensional printing-assisted contoured plate fixation method in the treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture.
骨盆环损伤后医源性神经损伤:一项网状Meta分析。
Int J Surg. 2025 Mar 1;111(3):2697-2707. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002272.
4
Comparative Study Between the Mini-Open (≤2.5 Cm) Approach and Conventional Open Lateral Approach in the Surgical Treatment of Radial Head Fractures.小切口(≤2.5厘米)入路与传统开放外侧入路治疗桡骨头骨折的比较研究
J Pain Res. 2022 Oct 26;15:3413-3422. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S374599. eCollection 2022.
5
Combined anterior and posterior ring fixation versus posterior ring fixation alone in the management of unstable Tile B and C pelvic ring injuries: A randomized controlled trial.前路和后路联合固定与单纯后路固定治疗不稳定型Tile B 和 C 型骨盆环损伤的随机对照研究。
Chin J Traumatol. 2023 Jan;26(1):48-59. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
6
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis technique combined with locking compression plates guided by C-Arm X-Ray machine in treatment of tibial metaphyseal fractures: Curative effect and postoperative complications.C型臂X线机引导下微创经皮钢板接骨术联合锁定加压钢板治疗胫骨近端干骺端骨折的疗效及术后并发症
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Mar-Apr;38(3Part-I):505-510. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.3.4757.
7
Clinical application of anterior ring internal fixator system combined with sacroiliac screw fixation in Tile C pelvic fracture treatment.前环内固定系统联合骶髂螺钉固定在Tile C 型骨盆骨折治疗中的临床应用。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Dec 14;16(1):715. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02863-y.
8
Comparison of percutaneous cross screw fixation versus open reduction and internal fixation for pelvic Day type II crescent fracture-dislocation: case-control study.经皮交叉螺钉固定与切开复位内固定治疗骨盆 Day Ⅱ型新月形骨折脱位的比较:病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Jan 9;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-02197-1.
9
[Research progress on minimally invasive treatment of anterior pelvic ring fracture].[骨盆前环骨折微创治疗的研究进展]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Apr 15;34(4):529-535. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201907077.
常规钢板固定法与术前虚拟模拟和三维打印辅助塑形钢板固定法治疗骨盆前环骨折的比较。
Int Orthop. 2019 Feb;43(2):425-431. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-3963-2. Epub 2018 May 3.
4
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis on anterior pelvic ring injury and anterior column acetabular fracture.微创钢板接骨术治疗骨盆前环损伤及髋臼前柱骨折
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Jun 8.
5
Modified pedicle screw-rod fixation as a minimally invasive treatment for anterior pelvic ring injuries: an initial case series.改良椎弓根螺钉-棒固定术作为骨盆前环损伤的微创治疗:初步病例系列研究
J Orthop Surg Res. 2017 Jun 6;12(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s13018-017-0590-3.
6
Modified Stoppa Approach versus Ilioinguinal Approach for Anterior Acetabular Fractures; A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.改良Stoppa入路与髂腹股沟入路治疗髋臼前柱骨折的系统评价与Meta分析
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2017 Jan;5(1):6-12.
7
Complications after percutaneous internal fixator for anterior pelvic ring injuries.经皮内固定治疗骨盆前环损伤后的并发症
Int Orthop. 2017 Sep;41(9):1785-1790. doi: 10.1007/s00264-017-3415-4. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
8
INFIX versus plating for pelvic fractures with disruption of the symphysis pubis.耻骨联合分离的骨盆骨折采用髓内固定与钢板固定的比较
Int Orthop. 2017 Aug;41(8):1671-1678. doi: 10.1007/s00264-016-3387-9. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
9
Treatment of Unstable Posterior Pelvic Ring Fracture with Pedicle Screw-Rod Fixator Versus Locking Compression Plate: A Comparative Study.椎弓根螺钉棒固定器与锁定加压钢板治疗不稳定型骨盆后环骨折的对比研究
Med Sci Monit. 2016 Oct 17;22:3764-3770. doi: 10.12659/msm.900673.
10
"Anterior subcutaneous pelvic internal fixator (INFIX), Is it safe?" A cadaveric study.“前路皮下骨盆内固定器(INFIX)是否安全?”一项尸体研究。
Injury. 2016 Oct;47(10):2077-2080. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 13.