Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2019 May 27;28(2):639-649. doi: 10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0123. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
Background and Purpose The severity of aphasic impairment in chronic stroke survivors is typically thought to be stable by 6 months postonset. However, a recent study showed that stroke survivors with aphasia experience language improvement or decline in the chronic phase, years beyond onset. Little is known about why some individuals improve whereas others remain stable or decline. Additionally, no study has tracked changes in aphasia from assessments completed at multiple time points across many years. The current study offers a comprehensive analysis of potential predictive demographic and health information to determine which factors predict dynamic changes in aphasia severity in chronic stroke. Methods Individuals in the chronic stage of a single-event, left-hemisphere ischemic stroke were identified from an archival database and included for study ( N = 39). Participants were included if they had undergone 2 or more standardized language assessments acquired at time points at least 6 months apart, with the 1st assessment at least 6 months postinjury. A linear mixed-effects model was used to determine the impact of treatment and a variety of demographic and health factors on language change. Results Over time, half of the participants improved (51%), whereas approximately a quarter (26%) decreased, and a quarter (23%) remained stable. A greater number of aphasia treatment hours significantly predicted language improvement ( p = .03), whereas older stroke age was associated with long-term decline ( p = .04). Two interactions were found to be significant in predicting improvement in individuals with diabetes: Increased exercise and younger age at stroke were significant in predicting outcomes ( p < .05). Conclusions Factors that significantly influence language recovery in chronic aphasia include stroke age and receiving aphasia treatment. For those with diabetes, increased exercise was shown to improve outcomes. Results from this study offer clinicians greater insight into the influence of patient factors on long-term recovery from stroke aphasia while suggesting a potential adjunct to language therapy: exercise. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.7849304.
通常认为,慢性脑卒中幸存者的失语症严重程度在发病后 6 个月内就趋于稳定。然而,最近的一项研究表明,在发病多年后的慢性期,一些失语症脑卒中幸存者的语言能力会有所改善或下降。目前尚不清楚为什么有些人会改善,而有些人则保持稳定或下降。此外,尚无研究跟踪从多年多个时间点完成的评估中观察到的失语症变化。本研究全面分析了潜在的预测性人口统计学和健康信息,以确定哪些因素可预测慢性脑卒中后失语症严重程度的动态变化。
从档案数据库中确定了单个事件、左侧半球缺血性脑卒中的慢性期个体,并纳入研究(N=39)。如果参与者接受了至少 2 次标准化语言评估,且每次评估的时间间隔至少为 6 个月,且第 1 次评估至少在损伤后 6 个月,则纳入研究。使用线性混合效应模型来确定治疗以及各种人口统计学和健康因素对语言变化的影响。
随着时间的推移,有一半的参与者(51%)有所改善,大约四分之一(26%)的参与者下降,而四分之一(23%)的参与者保持稳定。接受更多的失语症治疗小时数显著预测语言改善(p=0.03),而较晚的脑卒中年龄与长期下降相关(p=0.04)。发现有两个交互作用对预测患有糖尿病的个体的改善具有重要意义:增加运动和脑卒中时年龄较小对结果具有显著预测意义(p<0.05)。
显著影响慢性失语症语言恢复的因素包括脑卒中年龄和接受失语症治疗。对于患有糖尿病的患者,增加运动可以改善预后。本研究的结果为临床医生提供了更多关于患者因素对脑卒中后失语症长期恢复的影响的深入了解,同时还提出了语言治疗的一种潜在辅助方法:运动。