• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Computer-aided National Early Warning Score to predict the risk of sepsis following emergency medical admission to hospital: a model development and external validation study.计算机辅助国家早期预警评分预测急诊入院后脓毒症风险:模型开发和外部验证研究。
CMAJ. 2019 Apr 8;191(14):E382-E389. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181418.
2
Performance of externally validated enhanced computer-aided versions of the National Early Warning Score in predicting mortality following an emergency admission to hospital in England: a cross-sectional study.外部验证的增强版国家早期预警评分在预测英国急诊入院后死亡率方面的性能:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 2;9(11):e031596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031596.
3
Development and External Validation of an Automated Computer-Aided Risk Score for Predicting Sepsis in Emergency Medical Admissions Using the Patient's First Electronically Recorded Vital Signs and Blood Test Results.开发并验证一种基于患者首次电子记录的生命体征和血液检查结果的自动计算机辅助风险评分,用于预测急诊入院患者发生脓毒症的风险。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):612-618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002967.
4
Development and validation of a novel computer-aided score to predict the risk of in-hospital mortality for acutely ill medical admissions in two acute hospitals using their first electronically recorded blood test results and vital signs: a cross-sectional study.开发和验证一种新的计算机辅助评分,以预测两家急症医院使用首次电子记录的血液检查结果和生命体征的急性入院患者住院期间死亡风险:一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 6;8(12):e022939. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022939.
5
Predictive accuracy of enhanced versions of the on-admission National Early Warning Score in estimating the risk of COVID-19 for unplanned admission to hospital: a retrospective development and validation study.入院时增强版国家早期预警评分对预测 COVID-19 非计划性入院风险的准确性:一项回顾性开发和验证研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):957. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06951-x.
6
The inclusion of delirium in version 2 of the National Early Warning Score will substantially increase the alerts for escalating levels of care: findings from a retrospective database study of emergency medical admissions in two hospitals .在国家早期预警评分第 2 版中纳入谵妄将大大增加升级护理级别的警报:来自两家医院急诊医疗入院的回顾性数据库研究的结果。
Clin Med (Lond). 2019 Mar;19(2):104-108. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.19-2-104.
7
Superior performance of National Early Warning Score compared with quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment Score in predicting adverse outcomes: a retrospective observational study of patients in the prehospital setting.国家早期预警评分优于快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估评分预测不良结局:一项在院前环境中对患者的回顾性观察研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2019 Dec;26(6):433-439. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000589.
8
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
9
Clinical performance of early warning scoring systems for identifying sepsis among anti-hypertensive agent users.抗高血压药物使用者中识别脓毒症的预警评分系统的临床性能。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.03.091. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
10
National Early Warning Score Is Modestly Predictive of Care Escalation after Emergency Department-to-Floor Admission.国家早期预警评分对急诊到病房入院后护理升级的预测作用有限。
J Emerg Med. 2020 Jun;58(6):882-891. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2020.03.032. Epub 2020 May 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasmonic coffee-ring biosensing for AI-assisted point-of-care diagnostics.用于人工智能辅助即时诊断的表面等离子体激元咖啡环生物传感技术。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 17;16(1):4597. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59868-y.
2
Combining host immune response biomarkers and clinical scores for early prediction of sepsis in infection patients.将宿主免疫反应生物标志物与临床评分相结合,用于感染患者脓毒症的早期预测。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2396569. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2396569. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
3
Comparing 11 early warning scores and three shock indices in early sepsis prediction in the emergency department.比较11种早期预警评分和三种休克指数在急诊科早期脓毒症预测中的作用。
World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(4):273-282. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.052.
4
Accuracy of automated computer-aided risk scoring systems to estimate the risk of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study.自动化计算机辅助风险评分系统对 COVID-19 风险评估的准确性:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Res Notes. 2024 Apr 18;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s13104-024-06773-0.
5
What's new in critical illness and injury science? The use of risk stratification tools in patients with suspected sepsis in the acute care settings.危重病与创伤科学领域有哪些新进展?急性护理环境中疑似脓毒症患者风险分层工具的应用。
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2023 Jan-Mar;13(1):1-3. doi: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_13_23. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
6
Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Early Detection of Sepsis Among Adult Inpatients: Scoping Review.计算机化临床决策支持系统用于早期检测成年住院患者脓毒症:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 23;24(2):e31083. doi: 10.2196/31083.
7
Observational study on wearable biosensors and machine learning-based remote monitoring of COVID-19 patients.基于可穿戴生物传感器和机器学习的 COVID-19 患者远程监测的观察性研究。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 23;11(1):4388. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82771-7.
8
Early detection of sepsis using artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol.利用人工智能进行脓毒症早期检测:系统评价方案。
Syst Rev. 2021 Jan 16;10(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01561-w.

本文引用的文献

1
qSOFA, SIRS and NEWS for predicting inhospital mortality and ICU admission in emergency admissions treated as sepsis.qSOFA、SIRS 和 NEWS 用于预测急诊治疗的疑似脓毒症患者的院内死亡率和 ICU 收治率。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jun;35(6):345-349. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207120. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
2
Development and External Validation of an Automated Computer-Aided Risk Score for Predicting Sepsis in Emergency Medical Admissions Using the Patient's First Electronically Recorded Vital Signs and Blood Test Results.开发并验证一种基于患者首次电子记录的生命体征和血液检查结果的自动计算机辅助风险评分,用于预测急诊入院患者发生脓毒症的风险。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):612-618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002967.
3
A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Criteria for the Diagnosis of Sepsis and Prediction of Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.快速序贯器官衰竭评估与全身性炎症反应综合征标准对脓毒症诊断及死亡率预测的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2018 Mar;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.12.015. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
4
Improving Recognition of Pediatric Severe Sepsis in the Emergency Department: Contributions of a Vital Sign-Based Electronic Alert and Bedside Clinician Identification.提高急诊科对儿童严重脓毒症的识别能力:基于生命体征的电子警报和床边临床医生识别的作用
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;70(6):759-768.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Jun 2.
5
Early detection, prevention, and mitigation of critical illness outside intensive care settings.在重症监护病房以外的环境中对危重病进行早期检测、预防和缓解。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Nov;11 Suppl 1:S5-S10. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2653.
6
Piloting electronic medical record-based early detection of inpatient deterioration in community hospitals.在社区医院试点基于电子病历的住院患者病情恶化早期检测。
J Hosp Med. 2016 Nov;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S18-S24. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2652.
7
Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome, and Early Warning Scores for Detecting Clinical Deterioration in Infected Patients outside the Intensive Care Unit.快速脓毒症相关器官功能衰竭评估、全身炎症反应综合征及早期预警评分用于检测重症监护病房以外感染患者的临床病情恶化
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Apr 1;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.
8
Using routine blood test results to predict the risk of death for emergency medical admissions to hospital: an external model validation study.利用常规血液检测结果预测医院急诊入院死亡风险:一项外部模型验证研究。
QJM. 2017 Jan;110(1):27-31. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcw110. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
9
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
10
Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data.使用行政健康数据对脓毒症的国际疾病分类第十版(ICD - 10)编码病例定义进行验证和优化。
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009487. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009487.

计算机辅助国家早期预警评分预测急诊入院后脓毒症风险:模型开发和外部验证研究。

Computer-aided National Early Warning Score to predict the risk of sepsis following emergency medical admission to hospital: a model development and external validation study.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Studies (Faisal, Mohammed), University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Bradford Institute for Health Research (Faisal), Bradford, UK; Department of Renal Medicine (Richardson), York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, York, UK; School of Clinical Therapies (Scally), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Strategy & Planning (Howes), Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals, Scunthorpe, UK; York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (Beatson), York, UK; Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals (Speed), Scunthorpe, UK; The Strategy Unit (Mohammed), NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK.

Faculty of Health Studies (Faisal, Mohammed), University of Bradford, Bradford, UK; Bradford Institute for Health Research (Faisal), Bradford, UK; Department of Renal Medicine (Richardson), York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust Hospital, York, UK; School of Clinical Therapies (Scally), University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; Department of Strategy & Planning (Howes), Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals, Scunthorpe, UK; York Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (Beatson), York, UK; Northern Lincolnshire and Goole Hospitals (Speed), Scunthorpe, UK; The Strategy Unit (Mohammed), NHS Midlands and Lancashire Commissioning Support Unit, West Bromwich, UK

出版信息

CMAJ. 2019 Apr 8;191(14):E382-E389. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181418.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.181418
PMID:30962196
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6453675/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In hospitals in England, patients' vital signs are monitored and summarized into the National Early Warning Score (NEWS); this score is more accurate than the Quick Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score at identifying patients with sepsis. We investigated the extent to which the accuracy of the NEWS is enhanced by developing and comparing 3 computer-aided NEWS (cNEWS) models (M0 = NEWS alone, M1 = M0 + age + sex, M2 = M1 + subcomponents of NEWS + diastolic blood pressure) to predict the risk of sepsis.

METHODS

We included all emergency medical admissions of patients 16 years of age and older discharged over 24 months from 2 acute care hospital centres (York Hospital [YH] for model development and a combined data set from 2 hospitals [Diana, Princess of Wales Hospital and Scunthorpe General Hospital] in the Northern Lincolnshire and Goole National Health Service Foundation Trust [NH] for external model validation). We used a validated Canadian method for defining sepsis from administrative hospital data.

RESULTS

The prevalence of sepsis was lower in YH (4.5%, 1596/35 807) than in NH (8.5%, 2983/35 161). The C statistic increased across models (YH: M0 0.705, M1 0.763, M2 0.777; NH: M0 0.708, M1 0.777, M2 0.791). For NEWS of 5 or higher, sensitivity increased (YH: 47.24% v. 50.56% v. 52.69%; NH: 37.91% v. 43.35% v. 48.07%), the positive likelihood ratio increased (YH: 2.77 v. 2.99 v. 3.06; NH: 3.18 v. 3.32 v. 3.45) and the positive predictive value increased (YH: 11.44% v. 12.24% v. 12.49%; NH: 22.75% v. 23.55% v. 24.21%).

INTERPRETATION

From the 3 cNEWS models, model M2 is the most accurate. Given that it places no additional burden of data collection on clinicians and can be automated, it may now be carefully introduced and evaluated in hospitals with sufficient informatics infrastructure.

摘要

背景

在英国的医院中,患者的生命体征被监测并汇总为国家早期预警评分(NEWS);与快速脓毒症相关器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分相比,该评分更能准确识别脓毒症患者。我们研究了通过开发和比较 3 种计算机辅助 NEWS(cNEWS)模型(M0 = 仅 NEWS,M1 = M0 + 年龄+性别,M2 = M1 + NEWS 的亚组分+舒张压)来提高 NEWS 准确性的程度,以预测脓毒症的风险。

方法

我们纳入了 2 个急性护理中心(约克医院[YH]用于模型开发和来自北林肯郡和古尔国家卫生服务信托基金会[NH]的 2 家医院[戴安娜公主医院和斯肯索普综合医院]的合并数据集)在 24 个月内出院的 16 岁及以上的所有急诊医疗入院患者。我们使用一种经过验证的加拿大方法从医院管理数据中定义脓毒症。

结果

YH(4.5%,1596/35807)的脓毒症患病率低于 NH(8.5%,2983/35161)。模型的 C 统计量均增加(YH:M0 0.705,M1 0.763,M2 0.777;NH:M0 0.708,M1 0.777,M2 0.791)。对于 NEWS 为 5 或更高,敏感性增加(YH:47.24% v. 50.56% v. 52.69%;NH:37.91% v. 43.35% v. 48.07%),阳性似然比增加(YH:2.77 v. 2.99 v. 3.06;NH:3.18 v. 3.32 v. 3.45),阳性预测值增加(YH:11.44% v. 12.24% v. 12.49%;NH:22.75% v. 23.55% v. 24.21%)。

解释

在 3 种 cNEWS 模型中,模型 M2 最准确。鉴于它不会给临床医生带来额外的数据收集负担,并且可以实现自动化,因此现在可以在具有足够信息学基础设施的医院中仔细引入和评估该模型。