• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全膝关节置换翻修术的流行病学:单中心经验

Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Center's Experience.

作者信息

Kulshrestha Vikas, Datta Barun, Mittal Gaurav, Kumar Santhosh

机构信息

Joint Replacement Centre, Army Hospital Research and Referral, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2019 Mar-Apr;53(2):282-288. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_127_17.

DOI:10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_127_17
PMID:30967698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6415567/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There has been a gradual increase in the revision TKA (RTKA) workload due to expanding indications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), coupled with improving patient longevity. Western countries are already looking at their data on RTKA to plan for the future heath care needs of these patients. Limited data is available on RTKA from developing countries. Our study attempts to fill this gap in knowledge.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively documented details of all RTKA performed at our centre for a period of six years (2011-16). We recorded the volume, causes and time to failure from index surgery of all RTKA and further recorded microbiological pattern in septic failures. We looked at the proportion of each cause of failure and time from index surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 5068 TKA procedures performed from January 2011 to December 2016, 201 (4%) were first-time revisions. The predominant cause of revisions was prosthetic infection (61%) followed by aseptic loosening (18%) and instability (7%). In the early, mid term, and late-failure groups, prosthetic infection remained the main cause of failure. In 47% of the septic revisions, the offending organisms could be identified and of those identified most (67%) were Gram-negative.

CONCLUSION

The volume of first-time RTKA procedures (4%) at our center remained low compared with that of the Western countries. In Western countries, the incidence of late aseptic failures was higher than that of early-septic failures, whereas in our study, revisions were more commonly performed in the early-failure group (48%) and most failures were due to prosthetic infection (61%).

摘要

背景

由于全膝关节置换术(TKA)的适应症不断扩大,加上患者寿命延长,翻修全膝关节置换术(RTKA)的工作量逐渐增加。西方国家已经在研究其RTKA数据,以规划这些患者未来的医疗保健需求。来自发展中国家的RTKA数据有限。我们的研究试图填补这一知识空白。

材料与方法

我们前瞻性地记录了在我们中心进行的为期六年(2011 - 16年)的所有RTKA的详细信息。我们记录了所有RTKA的手术量、失败原因以及初次手术后的失败时间,并进一步记录了感染性失败中的微生物模式。我们研究了每种失败原因的比例以及初次手术后的时间。

结果

在2011年1月至2016年12月期间进行的5068例TKA手术中,201例(4%)是初次翻修。翻修的主要原因是假体感染(61%),其次是无菌性松动(18%)和不稳定(7%)。在早期、中期和晚期失败组中,假体感染仍然是主要的失败原因。在47%的感染性翻修病例中,可以确定致病微生物,其中大多数(67%)是革兰氏阴性菌。

结论

与西方国家相比,我们中心初次RTKA手术的比例(4%)仍然较低。在西方国家,晚期无菌性失败的发生率高于早期感染性失败,而在我们的研究中,翻修更常见于早期失败组(48%),并且大多数失败是由于假体感染(61%)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/7cc6bf253daf/IJOrtho-53-282-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/95d8e23ec34c/IJOrtho-53-282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/c8361dd23c40/IJOrtho-53-282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/f1465a95be36/IJOrtho-53-282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/7cc6bf253daf/IJOrtho-53-282-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/95d8e23ec34c/IJOrtho-53-282-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/c8361dd23c40/IJOrtho-53-282-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/f1465a95be36/IJOrtho-53-282-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf40/6415567/7cc6bf253daf/IJOrtho-53-282-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single Center's Experience.全膝关节置换翻修术的流行病学:单中心经验
Indian J Orthop. 2019 Mar-Apr;53(2):282-288. doi: 10.4103/ortho.IJOrtho_127_17.
2
Epidemiology of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: An Indian Experience.翻修全髋关节置换术的流行病学:印度的经验
Indian J Orthop. 2020 May 12;54(5):608-615. doi: 10.1007/s43465-020-00086-7. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Impact of time to revision total knee arthroplasty on outcomes following aseptic failure.翻修全膝关节置换术的时间对无菌性失败后结局的影响。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2023 May 30;35(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s43019-023-00191-5.
4
Periprosthetic Infection: Major Cause of Early Failure of Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.人工关节周围感染:初次及翻修全膝关节置换早期失败的主要原因
J Knee Surg. 2019 Oct;32(10):941-946. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1672203. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
Blood loss after revision knee arthroplasty is 1.38- to 2.17-fold higher than after primary knee arthroplasty: A retrospective analysis of 898 cases.膝关节翻修术后的失血量比初次膝关节置换术高 1.38 至 2.17 倍:898 例回顾性分析。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 May;107(3):102856. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102856. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
6
Septic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Significantly Higher Mortality Than Aseptic Revisions: Long-Term Single-Center Study (1254 Patients).感染性翻修全膝关节置换术的死亡率明显高于无菌性翻修:长期单中心研究(1254 例患者)。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jun;36(6):2131-2136. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.01.068. Epub 2021 Jan 29.
7
Temporal Trends of Revision Etiologies in Total Knee Arthroplasty at a Single High-Volume Institution: An Epidemiological Analysis.单家高手术量机构全膝关节置换术翻修病因的时间趋势:一项流行病学分析
Arthroplast Today. 2021 May 17;9:68-72. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.04.001. eCollection 2021 Jun.
8
Prevalence, risk factors, microbiological results and clinical outcome in unexpected positive intraoperative cultures in unclear and presumed aseptic hip and knee revision arthroplasties - A ten-year retrospective analysis with a minimum follow up of 2 years.不明原因及疑似无菌性髋关节和膝关节翻修术中意外阳性术中培养物的患病率、危险因素、微生物学结果及临床结局——一项至少随访2年的十年回顾性分析
J Orthop Translat. 2024 Aug 17;48:156-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2024.08.002. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
Infection and periprosthetic fracture are the leading causes of failure after aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty.感染和假体周围骨折是无菌性翻修全膝关节置换术后失败的主要原因。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021 Aug;141(8):1373-1383. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03698-8. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
10
The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术的流行病学。
J Knee Surg. 2021 Nov;34(13):1396-1401. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735282. Epub 2021 Sep 10.

引用本文的文献

1
AI classification of knee prostheses from plain radiographs and real-world applications.基于X线平片的膝关节假体人工智能分类及实际应用
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Mar 11;35(1):107. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04238-z.
2
Appearance and evolution of radiolucent lines below the tibial implant in primary total knee arthroplasty.初次全膝关节置换术后胫骨假体下方透亮线的出现与演变。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1333-1344. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05100-9. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
3
Postoperative scores for robot-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty: A meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
[Comparison and estimation of different diagnostic methods in detecting the presence of periprosthetic joint infection].[不同诊断方法在检测人工关节周围感染存在情况中的比较与评估]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Apr 1;54(4):251-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.04.003.
2
Causes and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: Local results from Isfahan, Iran.全膝关节置换翻修术的原因及发生率:伊朗伊斯法罕的本地结果
Adv Biomed Res. 2015 May 29;4:111. doi: 10.4103/2277-9175.157829. eCollection 2015.
3
The epidemiology of revision total knee and hip arthroplasty in England and Wales: a comparative analysis with projections for the United States. A study using the National Joint Registry dataset.
机器人辅助与传统全膝关节置换术的术后评分:一项荟萃分析。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jun 10;41:102189. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102189. eCollection 2023 Jun.
4
Prediction of suitable outpatient candidates following revision total knee arthroplasty using machine learning.使用机器学习预测全膝关节置换翻修术后合适的门诊患者
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Jun 1;4(6):399-407. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.46.BJO-2023-0044.R1.
5
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the fully automated active robotic system in robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty.全自动化主动机器人系统在机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中的安全性和有效性评估。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Jan 13;37:102106. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102106. eCollection 2023 Feb.
6
Effect of Proprioception and Balance Training Combined with Continuous Nursing on BBS Score and HSS Score of Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.本体感觉和平衡训练联合持续护理对全膝关节置换术后患者 BBS 评分和 HSS 评分的影响。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 1;2022:7074525. doi: 10.1155/2022/7074525. eCollection 2022.
7
Comparison between Dexmedetomidine and Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Ropivacaine in Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial.右美托咪定与可乐定作为罗哌卡因辅助药物用于超声引导下股收肌管阻滞在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的比较:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2021 Apr-Jun;15(2):245-249. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_143_21. Epub 2022 Feb 7.
8
Comparable results between crosslinked polyethylene and conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene implanted in total knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.交联聚乙烯和传统超高相对分子质量聚乙烯在全膝关节置换术中的疗效比较:随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Sep;30(9):3120-3130. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-06879-7. Epub 2022 Feb 19.
9
Titanium Nanoparticles Enhance Production and Suppress Stabilin-1-Mediated Clearance of GDF-15 in Human Primary Macrophages.钛纳米颗粒增强人原代巨噬细胞中 GDF-15 的产生并抑制 Stabilin-1 介导的清除。
Front Immunol. 2021 Dec 15;12:760577. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.760577. eCollection 2021.
10
Different microbial and resistance patterns in primary total knee arthroplasty infections - a report on 283 patients from Lithuania and Sweden.原发性全膝关节置换感染中的不同微生物和耐药模式——来自立陶宛和瑞典的 283 例患者报告。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 17;22(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04689-5.
英格兰和威尔士翻修全膝关节和髋关节置换术的流行病学:与美国预测的比较分析。一项使用国家关节注册数据集的研究。
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1076-81. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.35170.
4
Current failure mechanisms after knee arthroplasty have changed: polyethylene wear is less common in revision surgery.目前膝关节置换术后的失败机制已经改变:聚乙烯磨损在翻修手术中不太常见。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015 May 6;97(9):715-20. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01534.
5
Update on the etiology of revision TKA -- Evident trends in a retrospective survey of 1449 cases.全膝关节置换翻修术病因学的最新进展——1449例回顾性调查中的明显趋势
Knee. 2015 Jun;22(3):174-9. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
6
Wear and loosening in total knee arthroplasty: a quick review.全膝关节置换术中的磨损与松动:简要综述
J Knee Surg. 2015 Apr;28(2):139-44. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398375. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
7
Why knee replacements fail in 2013: patient, surgeon, or implant?2013年膝关节置换失败的原因:患者、外科医生还是植入物?
Bone Joint J. 2014 Nov;96-B(11 Supple A):101-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B11.34350.
8
Current trends and projections in the utilisation rates of hip and knee replacement in New Zealand from 2001 to 2026.2001年至2026年新西兰髋关节和膝关节置换使用率的当前趋势及预测。
N Z Med J. 2014 Aug 29;127(1401):82-93.
9
Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today--has anything changed after 10 years?为什么如今全膝关节置换术会失败——10年后有什么变化吗?
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Sep;29(9):1774-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2013.07.024. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
10
Causes of failure after total knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis patients 55 years of age or younger.55岁及以下骨关节炎患者全膝关节置换术后失败的原因。
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2014 Mar;26(1):13-9. doi: 10.5792/ksrr.2014.26.1.13. Epub 2014 Feb 27.