• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陌生土地上的陌生人:他人价值观认知与公民参与及文化疏离之间的关系

Strangers in a Strange Land: Relations Between Perceptions of Others' Values and Both Civic Engagement and Cultural Estrangement.

作者信息

Sanderson Rebecca, Prentice Mike, Wolf Lukas, Weinstein Netta, Kasser Tim, Crompton Tom

机构信息

Common Cause Foundation, Powys, United Kingdom.

Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston Salem, NC, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 22;10:559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00559. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00559
PMID:30967809
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6440286/
Abstract

Healthy democracies require civic engagement (e.g., voting) from their citizens. Past research has suggested that civic engagement is positively associated with self-transcendence values of care and concern for the welfare of others, and negatively associated with self-enhancement values of self-interest, dominance, and personal success. However, research has yet to address whether people's are related to civic engagement. Across three studies with nationally representative samples in the UK and US (s ≥ 1,000), we explored how civic engagement relates to (a) perceptions of national values, (b) perceptions of the values of one's typical compatriot, and (c) perceptions of the values encouraged by social and cultural institutions. Study 1 showed that the tendency for British citizens to perceive British culture as valuing self-transcendence was associated with an increased likelihood of voting in the 2015 general election. These findings were replicated for "a typical British person" (Study 2) and "a typical American person" (Study 3); Studies 2 and 3 also found that perceived self-enhancement values of typical compatriots were negatively correlated with reported voting. We also examined how perceptions of others' values relate to cultural estrangement-the feeling of not fitting in one's culture or of being atypical. Like civic engagement, those who perceived less self-transcendence and more self-enhancement in their culture felt more culturally estranged. Mediation analyses in Studies 2 and 3 revealed that estrangement helped to explain the relationship between perceptions of others' values and voting. In sum, the extent to which Brits and Americans perceive that self-transcendence values are strongly held by other citizens is associated with feeling less estranged and with reports of being more civically engaged. In contrast, the perception that these targets hold or promote self-enhancement values is positively associated with feelings of estrangement, to the detriment of civic engagement. Implications for future research and democratic processes are discussed.

摘要

健康的民主制度需要公民的公民参与(如投票)。过去的研究表明,公民参与与关心他人福利的自我超越价值观呈正相关,与自我利益、支配和个人成功的自我提升价值观呈负相关。然而,研究尚未探讨人们的[此处原文缺失具体内容]是否与公民参与有关。在对英国和美国具有全国代表性样本的三项研究中(样本量s≥1000),我们探讨了公民参与如何与以下方面相关:(a)对国家价值观的认知,(b)对自己典型同胞价值观的认知,以及(c)对社会和文化机构所鼓励价值观的认知。研究1表明,英国公民认为英国文化重视自我超越的倾向与在2015年大选中投票的可能性增加有关。这些发现对于“一个典型的英国人”(研究2)和“一个典型的美国人”(研究3)得到了重复验证;研究2和3还发现,对典型同胞的自我提升价值观的认知与报告的投票行为呈负相关。我们还研究了对他人价值观的认知如何与文化疏离感——即感觉不适应自己的文化或与众不同——相关。与公民参与一样,那些在自己文化中感知到较少自我超越和较多自我提升的人会感到更强烈的文化疏离感。研究2和3中的中介分析表明,疏离感有助于解释对他人价值观的认知与投票之间的关系。总之,英国人和美国人认为其他公民强烈持有自我超越价值观的程度,与较少的疏离感以及更多的公民参与报告相关。相反,认为这些对象持有或推崇自我提升价值观的认知与疏离感呈正相关,对公民参与不利。本文讨论了对未来研究和民主进程的启示。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e348/6440286/ff911a5f499d/fpsyg-10-00559-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e348/6440286/e2c096ad77fd/fpsyg-10-00559-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e348/6440286/ff911a5f499d/fpsyg-10-00559-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e348/6440286/e2c096ad77fd/fpsyg-10-00559-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e348/6440286/ff911a5f499d/fpsyg-10-00559-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Strangers in a Strange Land: Relations Between Perceptions of Others' Values and Both Civic Engagement and Cultural Estrangement.陌生土地上的陌生人:他人价值观认知与公民参与及文化疏离之间的关系
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 22;10:559. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00559. eCollection 2019.
2
The relationship between adolescents' civic knowledge, civic attitude, and civic behavior and their self-reported future likelihood of voting.青少年的公民知识、公民态度、公民行为与他们自我报告的未来投票可能性之间的关系。
Educ Citizsh Soc Justice. 2013 Mar 1;8(1):43-57. doi: 10.1177/1746197912456339.
3
A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.一种关于投票的社会文化方法:将投票视为对他人的责任,可以预测政治兴趣和参与度。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 28;121(22):e2215051121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2215051121. Epub 2024 May 20.
4
Climate stress and anxiety, environmental context, and civic engagement: A nationally representative study.气候压力与焦虑、环境背景和公民参与:一项全国代表性研究。
J Environ Psychol. 2024 Feb;93. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102220. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
5
Civic engagement patterns and transitions over 8 years: the AmeriCorps national study.公民参与模式及其 8 年来的转变:美国志工全国研究。
Dev Psychol. 2011 Nov;47(6):1728-43. doi: 10.1037/a0025360. Epub 2011 Sep 12.
6
Factors related to health civic engagement: results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a Culture of Health.与健康公民参与相关的因素:2018 年健康态度全国调查的结果,以了解朝着健康文化方向取得的进展。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w.
7
The Role of Primary Care in Advancing Civic Engagement and Health Equity: A Conceptual Framework.初级医疗保健在促进公民参与和健康公平方面的作用:概念框架。
Milbank Q. 2023 Sep;101(3):731-767. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12661. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
8
Youth's Initiations of Civic and Political Discussions in Class: Do Youth's Perceptions of Teachers' Behaviors Matter and Why?青少年在课堂上发起公民与政治讨论:青少年对教师行为的认知重要吗?为什么?
J Youth Adolesc. 2016 Nov;45(11):2233-2245. doi: 10.1007/s10964-016-0525-z. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
We Are Still Here: Omission and Perceived Discrimination Galvanized Civic Engagement Among Native Americans.我们仍然在这里:美国原住民的遗漏和感知歧视激发了公民参与。
Psychol Sci. 2023 Jul;34(7):739-753. doi: 10.1177/09567976231165271. Epub 2023 May 15.
10
Civic engagement and political participation among American Indians and Alaska natives in the US.美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民在美国的公民参与和政治参与情况。
Polit Groups Identities. 2017;5(4):642-659. doi: 10.1080/21565503.2016.1148058. Epub 2016 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
What motivates start-up entrepreneurs? Exploring the role of human values in success.是什么激励着初创企业的企业家?探索人类价值观在成功中的作用。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 13;19(12):e0312944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312944. eCollection 2024.
2
Longitudinal processes among humility, social justice activism, transcendence, and well-being.谦逊、社会正义行动主义、超越与幸福之间的纵向过程。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 8;15:1332640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1332640. eCollection 2024.
3
Perceived significant others' values: Are they important in the relationship between personal values and self-reported prosociality?

本文引用的文献

1
Statistically Controlling for Confounding Constructs Is Harder than You Think.对混杂结构进行统计控制比你想象的要难。
PLoS One. 2016 Mar 31;11(3):e0152719. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152719. eCollection 2016.
2
To Live Among Like-Minded Others: Exploring the Links Between Person-City Personality Fit and Self-Esteem.与志同道合的人生活在一起:探索人与城市人格适配度和自尊之间的联系。
Psychol Sci. 2016 Mar;27(3):419-27. doi: 10.1177/0956797615627133. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
3
Changing Norms to Change Behavior.改变规范以改变行为。
重要他人的价值观:它们在个人价值观与自我报告的亲社会行为之间的关系中重要吗?
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2022 Nov 9;11(2):137-149. doi: 10.5114/cipp/151678. eCollection 2023.
4
I Am vs. We Are: How Biospheric Values and Environmental Identity of Individuals and Groups Can Influence Pro-environmental Behaviour.“我”与“我们”:个体与群体的生物圈价值观及环境身份认同如何影响环保行为
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 18;12:618956. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.618956. eCollection 2021.
5
The importance of (shared) human values for containing the COVID-19 pandemic.(共享)人类价值观对于遏制 COVID-19 大流行的重要性。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):618-627. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12401. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:339-61. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015013. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
4
Perceiving political polarization in the United States: party identity strength and attitude extremity exacerbate the perceived partisan divide.感知美国的政治极化:党派认同强度和态度极端性加剧了感知到的党派分歧。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Mar;10(2):145-58. doi: 10.1177/1745691615569849.
5
Priming effects on cooperative behavior in social dilemmas: considering the prime and the person.社会困境中启动效应对合作行为的影响:考虑启动因素与个体
J Soc Psychol. 2015 Mar-Apr;155(2):163-81. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2014.977763. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
6
Values and helping behavior: A study in four cultures.价值观和助人行为:四个文化的研究
Int J Psychol. 2015 Jun;50(3):186-92. doi: 10.1002/ijop.12086. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
7
Personal values and political activism: a cross-national study.个人价值观与政治激进主义:一项跨国研究。
Br J Psychol. 2015 Feb;106(1):84-106. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12067. Epub 2014 Mar 7.
8
How and when do personal values guide our attitudes and sociality? Explaining cross-cultural variability in attitude-value linkages.个人价值观如何以及何时指导我们的态度和社交行为?解释态度-价值观关联的跨文化变异性。
Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1113-47. doi: 10.1037/a0031347. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
9
Changing, priming, and acting on values: effects via motivational relations in a circular model.价值观的改变、启动与践行:循环模型中通过动机关系产生的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Oct;97(4):699-715. doi: 10.1037/a0016420.
10
A power primer.强力底漆。
Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155.