Department of Experimental Medicine, Pharmacology Division, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", 80138 Naples, Italy.
Department of Pharmacology and Neuroscience, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430-6592, USA.
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr 9;20(7):1757. doi: 10.3390/ijms20071757.
This study investigated whether metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR) 5 and 8 are involved in the effect of ultramicronizedpalmitoylethanolamide (um-PEA) on the cognitive behavior and long term potentiation (LTP) at entorhinal cortex (LEC)-dentate gyrus (DG) pathway in mice rendered neuropathic by the spare nerve injury (SNI). SNI reduced discriminative memory and LTP. Um-PEA treatment started after the development of neuropathic pain had no effects in sham mice, whereas it restored cognitive behavior and LTP in SNI mice. 2-Methyl-6-(phenylethynyl) pyridine (MPEP), a selective mGluR5 antagonist, improved cognition in SNI mice and produced a chemical long term depression of the field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) in sham and SNI mice. After theta burst stimulation (TBS) MPEP restored LTP in SNI mice. In combination with PEA, MPEP antagonized the PEA effect on discriminative memory and decreased LTP in SNI mice. The (RS)-4-(1-amino-1-carboxyethyl)phthalic acid (MDCPG), a selective mGluR8 antagonist, did not affect discriminative memory, but it induced a chemical LTP and prevented the enhancement of fEPSPs after TBS in SNI mice which were treated or not treated with PEA. The effect of PEA on LTP and cognitive behavior was modulated by mGluR5 and mGluR8. In particular in the SNI conditions, the mGluR5 blockade facilitated memory and LTP, but prevented the beneficial effects of PEA on discriminative memory while the mGluR8 blockade, which was ineffective in itself, prevented the favorable action of the PEA on LTP. Thus, although their opposite roles (excitatory/inhibitory of the two receptor subtypes on the glutamatergic system), they appeared to be required for the neuroprotective effect of PEA in conditions of neuropathic pain.
这项研究调查了代谢型谷氨酸受体 (mGluR) 5 和 8 是否参与了超微化棕榈酰乙醇酰胺 (um-PEA) 对 spared nerve injury (SNI) 所致神经病理性小鼠的认知行为和海马齿状回(DG)通路长时程增强(LTP)的影响。SNI 降低了辨别记忆和 LTP。在假手术小鼠中,um-PEA 治疗在神经病理性疼痛发展后没有效果,而在 SNI 小鼠中,它恢复了认知行为和 LTP。2-甲基-6-(苯乙炔基)吡啶(MPEP),一种选择性 mGluR5 拮抗剂,改善了 SNI 小鼠的认知能力,并在假手术和 SNI 小鼠中产生了场兴奋性突触后电位(fEPSP)的化学长时程抑制。经 theta 爆发刺激(TBS)后,MPEP 恢复了 SNI 小鼠的 LTP。与 PEA 联合使用时,MPEP 拮抗了 PEA 对辨别记忆的作用,并降低了 SNI 小鼠的 LTP。(RS)-4-(1-氨基-1-羧基乙基)邻苯二甲酸(MDCPG),一种选择性 mGluR8 拮抗剂,不影响辨别记忆,但诱导了化学性 LTP,并防止了 SNI 小鼠经或未经 PEA 治疗后 TBS 后的 fEPSP 增强。mGluR5 和 mGluR8 调节了 PEA 对 LTP 和认知行为的作用。特别是在 SNI 条件下,mGluR5 阻断促进了记忆和 LTP,但阻止了 PEA 对辨别记忆的有益作用,而 mGluR8 阻断本身无效,阻止了 PEA 对 LTP 的有利作用。因此,尽管它们的作用相反(两种受体亚型对谷氨酸能系统的兴奋/抑制),但它们似乎是 PEA 在神经病理性疼痛条件下发挥神经保护作用所必需的。