Suppr超能文献

重新聚焦会议:评估瑞克·汉森研究所 Praxis 2016 的采用、实施和维持情况。

RE-AIMing conferences: evaluating the adoption, implementation and maintenance of the Rick Hansen Institute's Praxis 2016.

机构信息

School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD) University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In April 2016, the Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) hosted an innovative, 2-day conference called Praxis 2016. RHI aimed to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to develop solutions for overcoming the challenges of translating spinal cord injury (SCI) research into practice. To understand the impact of Praxis, RHI funded an independent team to evaluate Praxis at the individual and setting level using the RE-AIM framework. Individual-level findings are published elsewhere. The aim of this evaluation is to report on the impact of Praxis at the setting level in terms of its adoption, implementation and maintenance.

METHODS

Data sources included interviews with attendees (n = 13) and organisers (n = 9), a fidelity assessment conducted at the conference, and observation notes provided by the evaluation team.

RESULTS

Main findings indicated that the Praxis model was adopted by organisers and attendees, implemented by RHI as intended, and has the potential for long-term maintenance. Lessons learned highlighted the importance of including SCI community members throughout the entire process from development to post-conference activities as well as in the research process, the value of facilitation and fostering interactive problem solving, and the need to identify leadership and funds to foster long-term efforts.

CONCLUSIONS

Developing and implementing a solutions-focused conference that brings together a diverse group of SCI stakeholders was challenging and rewarding for attendees and organisers. Other domains could learn from, adopt and build on the Praxis 2016 approach to address research-to-practice gaps.

摘要

背景

2016 年 4 月,里克·汉森研究所(RHI)举办了一场创新的为期两天的会议,名为 Praxis 2016。RHI 旨在召集一群多元化的利益相关者,共同制定解决方案,以克服将脊髓损伤(SCI)研究转化为实践的挑战。为了了解 Praxis 的影响,RHI 资助了一个独立的团队,使用 RE-AIM 框架从个人和环境层面评估 Praxis。个人层面的研究结果已在其他地方发表。本次评估旨在根据采用、实施和维持情况,报告 Praxis 在环境层面的影响。

方法

数据来源包括对与会者(n=13)和组织者(n=9)的访谈、在会议上进行的保真度评估,以及评估小组提供的观察记录。

结果

主要发现表明,Praxis 模式得到了组织者和与会者的采用,RHI 按预期实施,并且具有长期维持的潜力。经验教训强调了在从开发到会议后活动以及研究过程中,让 SCI 社区成员全程参与的重要性,包括促进和培养互动式问题解决的价值,以及需要确定领导力和资金,以促进长期努力。

结论

开发和实施一个以解决方案为重点的会议,召集了一群多元化的 SCI 利益相关者,对与会者和组织者来说是具有挑战性和有益的。其他领域可以借鉴、采用并基于 Praxis 2016 方法来解决研究与实践之间的差距。

相似文献

4
Developing a data sharing community for spinal cord injury research.
Exp Neurol. 2017 Sep;295:135-143. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Evaluating the impact of a network of research partnerships: a longitudinal multiple case study protocol.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Nov 12;16(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0377-y.
6
The Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR): a national patient-registry.
Spinal Cord. 2012 Jan;50(1):22-7. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.109. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
8
Development and assessment of a community follow-up questionnaire for the Rick Hansen spinal cord injury registry.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Sep;94(9):1753-65. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring continuing medical education conference impact and attendee experience: a scoping review.
Int J Med Educ. 2024 Feb 29;15:15-33. doi: 10.5116/ijme.65cc.8c88.
2
Engaging interested parties to optimize wildfire smoke communication in Canada: challenges with initiating change.
Front Public Health. 2023 Nov 2;11:1268249. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268249. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

2
Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
Spinal Cord. 2014 Aug;52(8):578-87. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.62. Epub 2014 May 6.
4
The economic burden of traumatic spinal cord injury in Canada.
Chronic Dis Inj Can. 2013 Jun;33(3):113-22.
5
The RE-AIM framework: a systematic review of use over time.
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e38-46. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301299. Epub 2013 Apr 18.
6
The answer is 17 years, what is the question: understanding time lags in translational research.
J R Soc Med. 2011 Dec;104(12):510-20. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110180.
7
Community-based knowledge translation: unexplored opportunities.
Implement Sci. 2011 Jun 6;6:59. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-59.
8
The Assessment, Monitoring, and Enhancement of Treatment Fidelity In Public Health Clinical Trials.
J Public Health Dent. 2011 Winter;71(s1):S52-S63. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2011.00233.x.
9
Some theoretical underpinnings of knowledge translation.
Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Nov;14(11):936-41. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2007.07.004.
10
How can we increase translation of research into practice? Types of evidence needed.
Annu Rev Public Health. 2007;28:413-33. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144145.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验