School of Health and Exercise Sciences, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, BC, Canada.
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD) University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 11;17(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0434-1.
In April 2016, the Rick Hansen Institute (RHI) hosted an innovative, 2-day conference called Praxis 2016. RHI aimed to bring together a diverse group of stakeholders to develop solutions for overcoming the challenges of translating spinal cord injury (SCI) research into practice. To understand the impact of Praxis, RHI funded an independent team to evaluate Praxis at the individual and setting level using the RE-AIM framework. Individual-level findings are published elsewhere. The aim of this evaluation is to report on the impact of Praxis at the setting level in terms of its adoption, implementation and maintenance.
Data sources included interviews with attendees (n = 13) and organisers (n = 9), a fidelity assessment conducted at the conference, and observation notes provided by the evaluation team.
Main findings indicated that the Praxis model was adopted by organisers and attendees, implemented by RHI as intended, and has the potential for long-term maintenance. Lessons learned highlighted the importance of including SCI community members throughout the entire process from development to post-conference activities as well as in the research process, the value of facilitation and fostering interactive problem solving, and the need to identify leadership and funds to foster long-term efforts.
Developing and implementing a solutions-focused conference that brings together a diverse group of SCI stakeholders was challenging and rewarding for attendees and organisers. Other domains could learn from, adopt and build on the Praxis 2016 approach to address research-to-practice gaps.
2016 年 4 月,里克·汉森研究所(RHI)举办了一场创新的为期两天的会议,名为 Praxis 2016。RHI 旨在召集一群多元化的利益相关者,共同制定解决方案,以克服将脊髓损伤(SCI)研究转化为实践的挑战。为了了解 Praxis 的影响,RHI 资助了一个独立的团队,使用 RE-AIM 框架从个人和环境层面评估 Praxis。个人层面的研究结果已在其他地方发表。本次评估旨在根据采用、实施和维持情况,报告 Praxis 在环境层面的影响。
数据来源包括对与会者(n=13)和组织者(n=9)的访谈、在会议上进行的保真度评估,以及评估小组提供的观察记录。
主要发现表明,Praxis 模式得到了组织者和与会者的采用,RHI 按预期实施,并且具有长期维持的潜力。经验教训强调了在从开发到会议后活动以及研究过程中,让 SCI 社区成员全程参与的重要性,包括促进和培养互动式问题解决的价值,以及需要确定领导力和资金,以促进长期努力。
开发和实施一个以解决方案为重点的会议,召集了一群多元化的 SCI 利益相关者,对与会者和组织者来说是具有挑战性和有益的。其他领域可以借鉴、采用并基于 Praxis 2016 方法来解决研究与实践之间的差距。