• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用理论领域框架指导脊髓损伤患者自我管理项目的开发:来自全国利益相关者咨询小组的结果

Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group.

作者信息

Munce Sarah E P, Allin Sonya, Wolfe Dalton L, Anzai Karen, Linassi Gary, Noonan Vanessa K, Jaglal Susan B

机构信息

a Brain and Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Program , Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network , Toronto , ON , Canada.

b Department of Physical Therapy , University of Toronto , Toronto , ON , Canada.

出版信息

J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov;40(6):687-695. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1356437. Epub 2017 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1080/10790268.2017.1356437
PMID:28758540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5778932/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the implementation considerations for a targeted self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) from the perspective of a national stakeholder advisory group using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as a guide.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive approach.

SETTING

Two focus groups held at the 6 National Spinal Cord Injury Conference (October 2-4, 2014) in Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 25 stakeholders from across Canada participated in focus groups or "brainstorming sessions". The stakeholders included 5 clinicians, 14 researchers, 3 policy makers, and 3 individuals with SCI.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Not applicable.

RESULTS

All 14 theoretical domains were identified in the brainstorming sessions. No new themes or domains were identified. The need to consider the theoretical domains of Knowledge, Skills, Reinforcement, Intentions, Goals (e.g. the readiness of the individual with SCI), Environmental Context and Resources (e.g. considerations for governance and ownership of the program and a business model for sustainability), as well as Social Influences (e.g. issues of privacy and security in the context of on-line delivery) was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provides complementary results to our previous series of studies on the implementation considerations for the development of a targeted self-management program for individuals with SCI by emphasizing the health care professional/health policy perspective. It is anticipated that such a program could not only reduce secondary complications and subsequent inappropriate health care use but it may also improve the quality of life for individuals with SCI and their caregivers.

摘要

目的

以国家利益相关者咨询小组的视角,使用理论领域框架(TDF)作为指导,确定针对脊髓损伤(SCI)个体的目标自我管理项目的实施考量因素。

设计

定性描述方法。

背景

在加拿大安大略省多伦多市举行的第6届全国脊髓损伤会议(2014年10月2 - 4日)上举办了两次焦点小组讨论。

参与者

来自加拿大各地的25名利益相关者参与了焦点小组讨论或“头脑风暴会议”。利益相关者包括5名临床医生、14名研究人员、3名政策制定者和3名脊髓损伤患者。

干预措施

不适用。

结果测量

不适用。

结果

在头脑风暴会议中确定了所有14个理论领域。未发现新的主题或领域。确定了需要考虑知识、技能、强化、意图、目标(例如脊髓损伤个体的准备情况)、环境背景和资源(例如项目治理和所有权的考量以及可持续性的商业模式)以及社会影响(例如在线提供背景下的隐私和安全问题)等理论领域。

结论

本研究通过强调医疗保健专业人员/卫生政策视角,为我们之前关于为脊髓损伤个体制定目标自我管理项目的实施考量因素的一系列研究提供了补充结果。预计这样一个项目不仅可以减少继发性并发症和随后不适当的医疗保健使用,还可能改善脊髓损伤个体及其护理人员的生活质量。

相似文献

1
Using the theoretical domains framework to guide the development of a self-management program for individuals with spinal cord injury: Results from a national stakeholder advisory group.运用理论领域框架指导脊髓损伤患者自我管理项目的开发:来自全国利益相关者咨询小组的结果
J Spinal Cord Med. 2017 Nov;40(6):687-695. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1356437. Epub 2017 Jul 30.
2
Prioritization of rehabilitation Domains for establishing spinal cord injury high performance indicators using a modification of the Hanlon method: SCI-High Project.采用改良的汉隆方法确定脊髓损伤高性能指标时康复领域的优先级划分:脊髓损伤高性能项目
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):43-50. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1616949.
3
Advancing primary and community care for persons with spinal cord injury: Key findings from a Canadian summit.推进脊髓损伤患者的初级和社区护理:加拿大峰会的主要发现。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2020 Mar;43(2):223-233. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1552643. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
4
Development of a Self-Management App for People with Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤患者自我管理应用程序的开发。
J Med Syst. 2019 Apr 22;43(6):145. doi: 10.1007/s10916-019-1273-x.
5
Development of an implementation-focused network to improve healthcare delivery as informed by the experiences of the SCI knowledge mobilization network.借鉴脊髓损伤知识传播网络的经验,开发一个以实施为重点的网络,以改善医疗服务提供。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):34-42. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1649343.
6
Methods for development of structure, process and outcome indicators for prioritized spinal cord injury rehabilitation Domains: SCI-High Project.为脊髓损伤康复重点领域制定结构、过程和结果指标的方法:SCI-High项目。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Oct;42(sup1):51-67. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1647386.
7
Meaning of self-management from the perspective of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury, their caregivers, and acute care and rehabilitation managers: an opportunity for improved care delivery.从创伤性脊髓损伤患者、他们的护理人员以及急性护理和康复管理人员的角度看自我管理的意义:改善护理服务的契机。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 23;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0534-2.
8
Barriers and facilitators of education provided during rehabilitation of people with spinal cord injuries: A qualitative description.脊髓损伤患者康复期间提供教育的障碍和促进因素:定性描述。
PLoS One. 2020 Oct 15;15(10):e0240600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240600. eCollection 2020.
9
Developing a mobile exercise program for individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: Stakeholder perceptions of app features and implementation determinants.为脊髓损伤患者开发移动锻炼计划:利益相关者对应用程序功能和实施决定因素的看法。
Disabil Health J. 2024 Oct;17(4):101667. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101667. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
10
Development of the Parent Forum: An in-person approach to supporting caregivers of youth with spinal cord injury.家长论坛的发展:一种支持脊髓损伤青少年照料者的面对面方式。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2019 Sep;42(5):545-556. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2019.1609873. Epub 2019 May 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify strategies to support the implementation of the guidelines for the physiotherapy management of people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study.运用理论领域框架确定支持脊髓损伤患者物理治疗管理指南实施的策略:一项定性研究。
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2025 Aug 28;11(1):25. doi: 10.1038/s41394-025-00719-9.
2
Evaluating a pilot community-based self-management program for adults with spinal cord injury.评估一项基于社区的脊髓损伤成年人自我管理计划的试点项目。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2024 Nov;47(6):881-892. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2220510. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
3
A scoping review of medication self-management intervention tools to support persons with traumatic spinal cord injury.创伤性脊髓损伤患者药物自我管理干预工具的范围综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 20;18(4):e0284199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284199. eCollection 2023.
4
Barriers and facilitators to changing bowel care practices after spinal cord injury: a Theoretical Domains Framework approach.脊髓损伤后改变肠道护理实践的障碍和促进因素:理论领域框架方法。
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jul;60(7):664-673. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00743-0. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
5
A Scoping Review of Self-Management Interventions Following Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤后自我管理干预措施的范围综述
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2020 Winter;26(1):36-63. doi: 10.1310/sci2601-36.
6
The Effect of the Interactive Mobile Health and Rehabilitation System on Health and Psychosocial Outcomes in Spinal Cord Injury: Randomized Controlled Trial.交互式移动健康与康复系统对脊髓损伤患者健康及心理社会结局的影响:随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Aug 28;21(8):e14305. doi: 10.2196/14305.
7
Participatory Design of an Online Self-Management Tool for Users With Spinal Cord Injury: Qualitative Study.脊髓损伤患者在线自我管理工具的参与式设计:定性研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018 Mar 21;5(1):e6. doi: 10.2196/rehab.8158.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Trial of a Peer-Led, Telephone-Based Empowerment Intervention for Persons With Chronic Spinal Cord Injury Improves Health Self-Management.一项针对慢性脊髓损伤患者的由同伴主导的基于电话的赋权干预随机试验改善了健康自我管理。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;98(6):1067-1076.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Mar 8.
2
Physical activity promotion for people with spinal cord injury: physiotherapists' beliefs and actions.脊髓损伤患者的身体活动促进:物理治疗师的信念与行动
Disabil Rehabil. 2018 Jan;40(1):52-61. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1242176. Epub 2016 Dec 5.
3
Pragmatism and integrated knowledge translation: exploring the compatabilities and tensions.实用主义与综合知识转化:探索兼容性与矛盾之处
Nurs Open. 2015 Oct 8;2(3):141-148. doi: 10.1002/nop2.30. eCollection 2015 Nov.
4
Meaning of self-management from the perspective of individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury, their caregivers, and acute care and rehabilitation managers: an opportunity for improved care delivery.从创伤性脊髓损伤患者、他们的护理人员以及急性护理和康复管理人员的角度看自我管理的意义:改善护理服务的契机。
BMC Neurol. 2016 Jan 23;16:11. doi: 10.1186/s12883-016-0534-2.
5
Impact of psychological characteristics in self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury.心理特征对创伤性脊髓损伤患者自我管理的影响。
Spinal Cord. 2016 Jan;54(1):29-33. doi: 10.1038/sc.2015.91. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
Experiences of using the Theoretical Domains Framework across diverse clinical environments: a qualitative study.在不同临床环境中使用理论领域框架的经验:一项定性研究。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2015 Mar 18;8:139-46. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S78458. eCollection 2015.
7
Views of people with traumatic spinal cord injury about the components of self-management programs and program delivery: a Canadian pilot study.创伤性脊髓损伤患者对自我管理项目组成部分及项目实施的看法:一项加拿大试点研究。
BMC Neurol. 2014 Oct 21;14:209. doi: 10.1186/s12883-014-0209-9.
8
Perceived facilitators and barriers to self-management in individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury: a qualitative descriptive study.创伤性脊髓损伤患者自我管理的感知促进因素和障碍:定性描述性研究。
BMC Neurol. 2014 Mar 13;14:48. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-14-48.
9
The meaning of self-care in persons with cervical spinal cord injury in Japan: a qualitative study.日本颈脊髓损伤患者自我护理的意义:一项定性研究。
BMC Neurol. 2013 Sep 4;13:115. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-115.
10
Social networks and secondary health conditions: the critical secondary team for individuals with spinal cord injury.社交网络与继发性健康状况:脊髓损伤患者的关键二级护理团队。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2012 Sep;35(5):330-42. doi: 10.1179/2045772312Y.0000000035.