• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用麻醉剂阻断一个手指的触觉输入可以增强其他手指的触觉感知和学习能力。

Blocking tactile input to one finger using anaesthetic enhances touch perception and learning in other fingers.

机构信息

Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.

Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):713-727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000514.

DOI:10.1037/xge0000514
PMID:30973263
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6459089/
Abstract

Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is "invaded" by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization leads to functional benefits for the invading representation, the behavioral evidence is controversial. Here, we investigate whether a temporary period of somatosensory input loss to one finger, induced by anesthetic block, is sufficient to cause improvements in touch perception ("direct" effects of deafferentation). Further, we determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training ("interactive" effects). Importantly, we explore whether direct and interactive effects of deprivation are dissociable by directly comparing their effects on touch perception. Using psychophysical thresholds, we found brief deprivation alone caused improvements in tactile perception of a finger adjacent to the blocked finger but not to non-neighboring fingers. Two additional groups underwent minimal tactile training to one finger either during anesthetic block of the neighboring finger or a sham block with saline. Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. That is, following deafferentation and training, learning gains were seen in fingers normally outside the boundaries of topographic transfer of tactile perceptual learning. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning. This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

大脑的可塑性是学习和恢复的关键机制。成年人大脑中的一个显著的可塑性例子发生在输入损失之后,例如,在截肢后,被剥夺的区域会被新的代表“入侵”。尽管人们长期以来一直认为这种重组会给入侵的代表带来功能上的好处,但行为证据存在争议。在这里,我们研究了短暂的感觉输入丧失是否足以引起触觉感知的改善(“直接”去传入的影响),即通过麻醉阻断一个手指的感觉输入。此外,我们确定这种剥夺是否可以通过增强感觉学习过程(例如训练)来改善触觉感知(“交互”效应)。重要的是,我们通过直接比较剥夺对触觉感知的影响来探索直接和交互影响是否可以分离。使用心理物理阈值,我们发现短暂的剥夺单独引起了被阻断手指相邻手指的触觉感知改善,但对非相邻手指没有影响。另外两组人在手指接受麻醉阻断或盐水假阻断的同时,接受了对一个手指的最小触觉训练。剥夺显著增强了触觉感知训练的效果,与假阻断相比,引起了更大的学习迁移。也就是说,在去传入和训练之后,在正常情况下位于触觉感知学习的拓扑转移范围之外的手指中可以看到学习增益。我们的结果表明,当与感觉学习结合使用时,感觉剥夺可以直接和交互地改善知觉能力。这种分离为未来改善感觉的临床干预提供了新的机会。(PsycINFO 数据库记录(c)2019 APA,保留所有权利)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/e1e44e616ab2/xge_148_4_713_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/09f5f157d1cc/xge_148_4_713_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/8e500ce82d13/xge_148_4_713_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/e1e44e616ab2/xge_148_4_713_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/09f5f157d1cc/xge_148_4_713_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/8e500ce82d13/xge_148_4_713_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c25/6459089/e1e44e616ab2/xge_148_4_713_fig3a.jpg

相似文献

1
Blocking tactile input to one finger using anaesthetic enhances touch perception and learning in other fingers.用麻醉剂阻断一个手指的触觉输入可以增强其他手指的触觉感知和学习能力。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2019 Apr;148(4):713-727. doi: 10.1037/xge0000514.
2
Topographic generalization of tactile perceptual learning.触觉感知学习的地形泛化
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):15-23. doi: 10.1037/a0033200. Epub 2013 Jul 15.
3
Tactile perceptual learning: learning curves and transfer to the contralateral finger.触觉感知学习:学习曲线和对侧手指的迁移。
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Feb;224(3):477-88. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3329-8. Epub 2012 Nov 18.
4
Transfer of tactile perceptual learning to untrained neighboring fingers reflects natural use relationships.触觉感知学习向未训练的相邻手指的转移反映了自然的使用关系。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1088-97. doi: 10.1152/jn.00181.2015. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Activity in the brain network for dynamic manipulation of unstable objects is robust to acute tactile nerve block: An fMRI study.针对不稳定物体动态操控的脑网络活动对急性触觉神经阻滞具有鲁棒性:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Res. 2015 Sep 16;1620:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.05.016. Epub 2015 May 19.
6
A physical constraint on perceptual learning: tactile spatial acuity improves with training to a limit set by finger size.知觉学习的物理限制:触觉空间分辨率随着训练而提高,但受到手指大小的限制。
J Neurosci. 2013 May 29;33(22):9345-52. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0514-13.2013.
7
Tactile learning transfer from the hand to the face but not to the forearm implies a special hand-face relationship.触觉学习从手部向面部转移,但不会向前臂转移,这表明手部和面部之间存在特殊的关系。
Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 6;8(1):11752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30183-5.
8
Integration of tactile input across fingers in a patient with finger agnosia.手指失认症患者手指间触觉输入的整合。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jan;49(1):138-46. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.11.006. Epub 2010 Nov 21.
9
Differential effects of synchronous and asynchronous multifinger coactivation on human tactile performance.同步和异步多指共同激活对人类触觉表现的不同影响。
BMC Neurosci. 2007 Jul 30;8:58. doi: 10.1186/1471-2202-8-58.
10
Tactile spatial acuity enhancement in blindness: evidence for experience-dependent mechanisms.触觉空间分辨率在失明中的增强:经验依赖机制的证据。
J Neurosci. 2011 May 11;31(19):7028-37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6461-10.2011.

引用本文的文献

1
Does Ipsilateral Remapping Following Hand Loss Impact Motor Control of the Intact Hand?手缺失后同侧手的重新映射是否影响健手的运动控制?
J Neurosci. 2024 Jan 24;44(4):e0948232023. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0948-23.2023.
2
Against cortical reorganisation.反对皮质重组。
Elife. 2023 Nov 21;12:e84716. doi: 10.7554/eLife.84716.
3
Similar somatotopy for active and passive digit representation in primary somatosensory cortex.初级体感皮层中主动和被动手指代表的相似躯体同部位性。

本文引用的文献

1
Representation of Multiple Body Parts in the Missing-Hand Territory of Congenital One-Handers.先天性独手者缺失手区域的多个身体部位的表象。
Curr Biol. 2017 May 8;27(9):1350-1355. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.03.053. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
2
Stability of Sensory Topographies in Adult Cortex.成年皮质中感觉拓扑结构的稳定性
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Mar;21(3):195-204. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.01.002. Epub 2017 Feb 15.
3
Bilateral representations of touch in the primary somatosensory cortex.初级体感皮层中触觉的双侧表征。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Jun 15;44(9):3568-3585. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26298. Epub 2023 May 5.
4
Malleability of the cortical hand map following a finger nerve block.手指神经阻滞后手皮质手区的可塑变化。
Sci Adv. 2022 Apr 22;8(16):eabk2393. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk2393.
5
Beyond body maps: Information content of specific body parts is distributed across the somatosensory homunculus.超越身体地图:特定身体部位的信息内容分布在躯体感觉小人上。
Cell Rep. 2022 Mar 15;38(11):110523. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110523.
6
Intrinsic somatosensory feedback supports motor control and learning to operate artificial body parts.内在躯体感觉反馈有助于运动控制和操作人工身体部位的学习。
J Neural Eng. 2022 Jan 24;19(1):016006. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac47d9.
7
Early life experience sets hard limits on motor learning as evidenced from artificial arm use.早期生活经历对运动学习设定了硬性限制,这可以从人工手臂的使用中得到证明。
Elife. 2021 Oct 4;10:e66320. doi: 10.7554/eLife.66320.
8
Human perceptual learning is delayed by the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor partial agonist D-cycloserine.人知觉学习会被 N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体部分激动剂 D-环丝氨酸延迟。
J Psychopharmacol. 2021 Mar;35(3):253-264. doi: 10.1177/0269881120986349. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
9
Brain (re)organisation following amputation: Implications for phantom limb pain.截肢后大脑(重新)组织:对幻肢痛的影响。
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116943. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116943. Epub 2020 May 16.
10
Remapping in Cerebral and Cerebellar Cortices Is Not Restricted by Somatotopy.大脑皮质和小脑皮质的重映射不受躯体定位的限制。
J Neurosci. 2019 Nov 20;39(47):9328-9342. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2599-18.2019. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016 Feb-Mar;33(1-2):48-66. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1159547. Epub 2016 Jun 17.
4
Transfer of tactile perceptual learning to untrained neighboring fingers reflects natural use relationships.触觉感知学习向未训练的相邻手指的转移反映了自然的使用关系。
J Neurophysiol. 2016 Mar;115(3):1088-97. doi: 10.1152/jn.00181.2015. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
5
Plasticity, and Its Limits, in Adult Human Primary Visual Cortex.成年人类初级视觉皮层的可塑性及其局限性
Multisens Res. 2015;28(3-4):297-307. doi: 10.1163/22134808-00002496.
6
Hand use predicts the structure of representations in sensorimotor cortex.手的使用预测感觉运动皮层中表征的结构。
Nat Neurosci. 2015 Jul;18(7):1034-40. doi: 10.1038/nn.4038. Epub 2015 Jun 1.
7
Short-term monocular deprivation alters GABA in the adult human visual cortex.短期单眼剥夺会改变成人视觉皮层中的γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)。
Curr Biol. 2015 Jun 1;25(11):1496-501. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 May 21.
8
Normalisation of brain connectivity through compensatory behaviour, despite congenital hand absence.尽管先天性手部缺失,但通过代偿行为实现大脑连接的正常化。
Elife. 2015 Jan 6;4:e04605. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04605.
9
Structure of receptive fields in a computational model of area 3b of primary sensory cortex.初级感觉皮层 3b 区计算模型中的感受野结构。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2014 Jul 28;8:76. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2014.00076. eCollection 2014.
10
Usage of the middle finger shapes reorganization of the primary somatosensory cortex in patients with index finger amputation.食指截肢患者中,中指使用导致初级体感皮层的形态重组。
Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2014;32(4):507-15. doi: 10.3233/RNN-130380.