Monash University, Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800 Australia.
Monash University, Accident Research Centre, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3800 Australia.
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:46-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.004. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
There is a paucity of research regarding aggressive behaviours of on-road cyclists and the consequences that aggression may have on their safety. To address this, we examined self-reported anger-based aggression in a sample of "active" cyclists (N = 623: males = 69%) defined as those who regularly ride a bicycle on-road (all rode at least once a week, 64% rode between 4-7 days per week). Using the Cyclist Anger Expression Inventory (CAX) three broad types of anger-based aggression were identified: 1) constructive ways of dealing with anger, 2) verbal aggression and 3) personal physical aggression. Cyclists reported that most to almost all of the time they deal with anger in adaptive constructive ways. When they were aggressive, they were most likely to express this through verbal types of aggression such as shouting or swearing aloud. Personal physical types of aggression were infrequent and these were the only type of behaviour found to be related to crashes. Regression analyses showed that factors associated with personal physical aggression included anger propensities, distance travelled, being male and younger. Interestingly, personal physical aggression was also more frequently expressed by cyclists classified as "strong and fearless" (Geller, 2009), that is avid cyclists who feel comfortable in all riding environments. Therefore, although the expressions of extreme aggression are rare, they are expressed in a group of riders who regularly ride on the road, making them particularly vulnerable. Effective strategies need to be developed to lessen cyclist aggression and mitigate the potential risks associated with these behaviours, for both cyclists and other vulnerable road users.
关于道路骑行者的攻击行为以及这种行为可能对他们的安全造成的后果,相关研究甚少。为了解决这一问题,我们在一组“活跃”的自行车骑行者(N=623:男性占 69%)中检查了基于愤怒的自我报告攻击性,这些骑行者被定义为经常在道路上骑自行车的人(所有人都至少每周骑行一次,64%的人每周骑行 4-7 天)。使用《自行车手愤怒表达量表》(CAX),确定了三种类型的基于愤怒的攻击行为:1)建设性地处理愤怒的方式,2)言语攻击,3)个人身体攻击。自行车手报告说,他们在大多数时间甚至几乎所有时间都以适应性的建设性方式处理愤怒。当他们表现出攻击性时,他们最有可能通过言语攻击,如大声喊叫或咒骂来表达。个人身体攻击则很少见,而且这种行为是唯一与撞车事故相关的行为。回归分析表明,与个人身体攻击相关的因素包括愤怒倾向、行驶距离、性别和年龄。有趣的是,被归类为“坚强无畏”(Geller,2009)的自行车手也更频繁地表现出个人身体攻击,即那些在所有骑行环境中都感到舒适的热衷骑行者。因此,尽管极端攻击性的表现很少见,但它们出现在经常在道路上骑行的一群骑手身上,使他们特别容易受到伤害。需要制定有效的策略来减少自行车手的攻击性,并减轻这些行为对自行车手和其他弱势道路使用者的潜在风险。