• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床乳房检查异常对乳腺癌筛查的准确性:横断面研究。

Accuracy of clinical breast examination's abnormalities for breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Faculté de medicine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

Department of General Practice, Faculté de medicine, Université Paris Descartes, Paris, France.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.003
PMID:30974372
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The guidelines for breast cancer screening with clinical breast examination (CBE) are diverging CBE is recommended in France, whereas it is not recommended in the United States and Canada, given the lack of clear benefit and the risk of overmedication. To assess the accuracy of abnormalities found during CBE for in breast cancer screening.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study included women over 18 years with no history of breast cancer coming for a mammography at 3 ambulatory radiology practices in Paris. A questionnaire collected the risk of breast cancer on mammography according to the Breast Imaging-Reporting And Data System (Bi-RADS) (high risk: Bi-RADS 4 or 5 versus lower risk: other Bi-RADS categories), the risk factors for breast cancer and the breast clinical abnormalities (none, mass, skin abnormality, oedema, pain, nipple discharge, lymph nodes…) For each abnormality, sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values were calculated.

RESULT

Among the 3218 included patients (mean age 55.1 +/-10 years), 713 (22.2%) had an abnormal CBE and 133 (4.1%) had high-risk mammography. The sensitivity of CBE was 36%[28%;45%] and the specificity was 78%[77%;80%]. The PPV and NPV for each clinical abnormality were low, except for nipple discharge, retraction and lymph nodes, for which the PPV were 10.5[3.7;29.9], 6.6[1.4;31.6], and 5.0[1.5;17.1], respectively, but these abnormalities were rare (0.5%, 0.2% and 0.5% respectively). These values were similar across all age groups.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of CBE for breast cancer screening appeared to be low which did not support recommending regular CBE in France.

摘要

目的

临床乳房检查(CBE)用于乳腺癌筛查的指南存在差异。在法国,推荐使用 CBE,但在美国和加拿大不推荐使用,因为缺乏明确的获益且存在过度用药的风险。本研究旨在评估 CBE 发现的异常在乳腺癌筛查中的准确性。

研究设计

本研究为一项横断面研究,纳入了来自巴黎 3 家门诊放射科的年龄在 18 岁以上、无乳腺癌病史的女性。通过乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)问卷调查评估患者的乳腺癌风险(高风险:BI-RADS 4 或 5 与低风险:其他 BI-RADS 类别)、乳腺癌风险因素和乳房临床异常(无、肿块、皮肤异常、水肿、疼痛、乳头溢液、淋巴结肿大等)。对于每个异常,计算了其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)。

结果

在纳入的 3218 例患者中(平均年龄 55.1±10 岁),713 例(22.2%)的 CBE 异常,133 例(4.1%)的乳腺 X 线摄影检查为高风险。CBE 的敏感性为 36%[28%;45%],特异性为 78%[77%;80%]。除乳头溢液、回缩和淋巴结外,每个临床异常的 PPV 和 NPV 均较低,其分别为 10.5[3.7;29.9]、6.6[1.4;31.6]和 5.0[1.5;17.1],但这些异常均较为罕见(分别为 0.5%、0.2%和 0.5%)。在所有年龄组中,这些值均相似。

结论

CBE 用于乳腺癌筛查的准确性似乎较低,这并不支持在法国常规推荐 CBE。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of clinical breast examination's abnormalities for breast cancer screening: cross-sectional study.临床乳房检查异常对乳腺癌筛查的准确性:横断面研究。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.003. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
2
The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening.临床乳腺检查对乳腺筛查准确性的贡献。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Sep 16;101(18):1236-43. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp241. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
3
The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program.临床乳腺检查在乳腺钼靶筛查项目中对浸润性癌检测的增量贡献。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Feb;184(2):428-32. doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.2.01840428.
4
Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammography screening in the early detection of breast cancer.临床乳腺检查在乳腺癌早期检测中对乳腺X线筛查的贡献。
J Med Screen. 2003;10(1):16-21. doi: 10.1258/096914103321610761.
5
Screening clinical breast examination.临床乳腺检查筛查
Surg Clin North Am. 2003 Aug;83(4):789-801. doi: 10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00028-8.
6
7
Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: a review of the literature.临床乳腺检查的操作与报告:文献综述
CA Cancer J Clin. 2004 Nov-Dec;54(6):345-61. doi: 10.3322/canjclin.54.6.345.
8
Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening With Risk-Based and Universal Mammography Screening Compared With Clinical Breast Examination: A Propensity Score Analysis of 1 429 890 Taiwanese Women.基于人群的乳腺癌筛查与基于风险和普遍的乳房 X 光筛查与临床乳房检查比较:对 1429890 名台湾妇女的倾向评分分析。
JAMA Oncol. 2016 Jul 1;2(7):915-21. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0447.
9
Screening clinical breast examination: how often does it miss lethal breast cancer?临床乳腺检查筛查:它漏诊致命性乳腺癌的频率有多高?
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2005(35):67-71. doi: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgi040.
10
Findings from 752,081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998.1995年至1998年期间向一项全国性筛查计划报告的752,081次临床乳房检查结果。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Jun 21;92(12):971-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.12.971.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multitask CNN for Near-Infrared Probe: Enhanced Real-Time Breast Cancer Imaging.用于近红外探头的多任务卷积神经网络:增强实时乳腺癌成像
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;25(8):2349. doi: 10.3390/s25082349.
2
Screening of Breast among Women: A Cross-Sectional Study in Nepal.尼泊尔女性乳腺癌筛查:一项横断面研究
Breast J. 2024 May 20;2024:9969169. doi: 10.1155/2024/9969169. eCollection 2024.
3
The role of clinical breast examination and fine needle aspiration cytology in early detection of breast cancer: A cross-sectional study nested in a cohort in a low-resource setting.
临床乳房检查和细针吸取细胞学在乳腺癌早期检测中的作用:在资源匮乏环境中的队列中嵌套的横断面研究。
Womens Health (Lond). 2024 Jan-Dec;20:17455057241250131. doi: 10.1177/17455057241250131.
4
Application of SHAP for Explainable Machine Learning on Age-Based Subgrouping Mammography Questionnaire Data for Positive Mammography Prediction and Risk Factor Identification.SHAP在基于年龄的乳腺钼靶问卷调查数据亚组划分中的应用,用于乳腺钼靶阳性预测和风险因素识别的可解释机器学习。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 11;11(14):2000. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11142000.
5
The iBreastExam versus clinical breast examination for breast evaluation in high risk and symptomatic Nigerian women: a prospective study.iBreastExam 与临床乳房检查在高风险和有症状的尼日利亚妇女乳房评估中的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Apr;10(4):e555-e563. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00030-4.
6
Use of Palpation Imaging in Diagnosis of Breast Diseases: A Way to Improve the Detection Rate.触诊成像在乳腺疾病诊断中的应用:提高检出率的一种方法。
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Nov 28;26:e927553. doi: 10.12659/MSM.927553.
7
Peripheral blood transcriptome identifies high-risk benign and malignant breast lesions.外周血转录组鉴定高危良性和恶性乳腺病变。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 4;15(6):e0233713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233713. eCollection 2020.