• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

连续 5 天改变幼儿的食物份量会产生持续影响:一项随机试验。

Portion size has sustained effects over 5 days in preschool children: a randomized trial.

机构信息

Departments of Nutritional Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

Departments of Food Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 May 1;109(5):1361-1372. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy383.

DOI:10.1093/ajcn/nqy383
PMID:30976782
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6499504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although short-term studies have found that serving larger portions of food increases intake in preschool children, it is unknown whether this portion size effect persists over a longer period or whether energy intake is moderated through self-regulation.

OBJECTIVES

We tested whether the portion size effect is sustained in preschool children across 5 consecutive days, a period thought to be sufficient for regulatory systems to respond to the overconsumption of energy.

METHODS

With the use of a crossover design, over 2 periods we served the same 5 daily menus to 46 children aged 3-5 y in their childcare centers. In 1 period, all foods and milk were served in baseline portions, and in the other period, all portions were increased by 50%. The served items were weighed to determine intake.

RESULTS

Increasing the portion size of all foods and milk by 50% increased daily consumption: weighed intake increased by a mean ± SEM of 143 ± 21 g/d (16%) and energy intake increased by 167 ± 22 kcal/d (18%; both P < 0.0001). The trajectories of intake by weight and energy across the 5-day period were linear and the slopes did not differ between portion conditions (both P > 0.13), indicating that there were sustained increases in intake from larger portions without compensatory changes over time. Children differed in their response to increased portions: those with higher weight status, lower ratings for satiety responsiveness, or higher ratings for food responsiveness had greater increases in intake from larger portions (all P < 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

This demonstration that preschool children failed to adjust their intake during prolonged exposure to larger portions challenges the suggestion that their self-regulatory behavior is sufficient to counter perturbations in energy intake. Furthermore, overconsumption from large portions may play a role in the development of overweight and obesity, as the magnitude of the effect was greater in children of higher weight status. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02963987.

摘要

背景

尽管短期研究发现,提供更大份量的食物会增加学龄前儿童的摄入量,但尚不清楚这种份量大小的影响是否能持续更长时间,或者能量摄入是否通过自我调节来调节。

目的

我们测试了在 5 天的连续时间内,这种份量大小的影响是否能在学龄前儿童中持续存在,这一时间段被认为足以让调节系统对能量过度摄入做出反应。

方法

我们采用交叉设计,在 2 个时期内,将相同的 5 份日常菜单提供给他们托儿中心的 46 名 3-5 岁的儿童。在一个时期内,所有的食物和牛奶都按基线份量供应,而在另一个时期,所有的份量都增加 50%。所供应的物品都经过称重以确定摄入量。

结果

将所有食物和牛奶的份量增加 50%,增加了每日的摄入量:称重摄入量增加了 143±21 克/天(16%),能量摄入量增加了 167±22 千卡/天(18%;均 P<0.0001)。在 5 天的时间里,摄入量的轨迹呈线性,在份量条件之间,斜率没有差异(均 P>0.13),这表明,在没有时间补偿的情况下,从较大份量中摄入的量持续增加。儿童对增加份量的反应不同:体重较高、饱腹感反应评分较低或食物反应评分较高的儿童,从较大份量中摄入的量增加得更多(均 P<0.03)。

结论

本研究表明,学龄前儿童在长时间接触较大份量时未能调整他们的摄入量,这对他们的自我调节行为足以抵消能量摄入波动的说法提出了挑战。此外,从大量食物中过度摄入可能在超重和肥胖的发展中起作用,因为体重较高的儿童的影响幅度更大。该试验在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上注册为 NCT02963987。

相似文献

1
Portion size has sustained effects over 5 days in preschool children: a randomized trial.连续 5 天改变幼儿的食物份量会产生持续影响:一项随机试验。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 May 1;109(5):1361-1372. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy383.
2
Food Properties and Individual Characteristics Influence Children's Intake Across Multiple Days of Weighed Assessments in Childcare Programs.食物特性和个体特征影响儿童在多天称重评估中在日托计划中的摄入量。
J Nutr. 2023 May;153(5):1646-1655. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.03.025. Epub 2023 Mar 24.
3
Children's bite size and intake of an entrée are greater with large portions than with age-appropriate or self-selected portions.与按年龄适配或自行选择的份量相比,儿童食用大份主菜时的一口量和摄入量更大。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 May;77(5):1164-70. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/77.5.1164.
4
Both increases and decreases in energy density lead to sustained changes in preschool children's energy intake over 5 days.能量密度的增加和减少都会导致学龄前儿童在 5 天内持续改变其能量摄入。
Physiol Behav. 2019 May 15;204:210-218. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.042. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
5
Double trouble: Portion size and energy density combine to increase preschool children's lunch intake.双重麻烦:食物分量和能量密度共同作用增加了学龄前儿童的午餐摄入量。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
6
Portion size can be used strategically to increase intake of vegetables and fruits in young children over multiple days: a cluster-randomized crossover trial.通过多次聚类随机交叉试验发现,控制分量大小可以战略性地增加幼儿对蔬菜和水果的摄入量。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2022 Jan 11;115(1):272-283. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab321.
7
Children's Energy Intake Generally Increases in Response to the Energy Density of Meals but Varies with the Amounts and Types of Foods Served.儿童的能量摄入通常会随着膳食的能量密度而增加,但也会因所提供的食物数量和种类而有所不同。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2024 Jan;119(1):185-195. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.10.019. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
8
Does milk matter: Is children's intake affected by the type or amount of milk served at a meal?牛奶重要吗:儿童的摄入量会受到用餐时所提供牛奶的类型或数量的影响吗?
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
9
Individual differences in susceptibility to large portion sizes among obese and normal-weight children.肥胖和正常体重儿童对大份量食物的易感性存在个体差异。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Apr;23(4):808-14. doi: 10.1002/oby.21014. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
10
Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days.更大的食物分量会导致两天内能量摄入量持续增加。
J Am Diet Assoc. 2006 Apr;106(4):543-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.01.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of apple form on satiety in 4-6 year-old children: possible evidence of sex differences.苹果形状对4至6岁儿童饱腹感的影响:性别差异的可能证据。
Appetite. 2025 Aug 13;216:108269. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2025.108269.
2
"The Big Three" properties of food that drive intake.驱动食物摄入的食物“三大”特性。
Physiol Behav. 2025 Oct 1;299:114994. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2025.114994. Epub 2025 Jun 11.
3
A systematic review of the relationship between portion size and indexes of adiposity in children.儿童食物分量与肥胖指标之间关系的系统综述。
Obes Rev. 2025 Aug;26(8):e13928. doi: 10.1111/obr.13928. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
4
PACE: a Novel Eating Behavior Phenotype to Assess Risk for Obesity in Middle Childhood.PACE:一种评估儿童中期肥胖风险的新型饮食行为表型。
J Nutr. 2024 Jul;154(7):2176-2187. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.05.019. Epub 2024 May 23.
5
'You just eyeball it': Parent and nursery staff perceptions and influences on child portion size: A reflexive thematic analysis.“你就凭肉眼估计一下”:家长和托儿所工作人员对儿童食物分量的认知及影响:一项反思性主题分析
Nutr Health. 2025 Jun;31(2):701-714. doi: 10.1177/02601060241245255. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
The Cerebellar Response to Visual Portion Size Cues Is Associated with the Portion Size Effect in Children.小脑对视觉食物分量线索的反应与儿童的食物分量效应相关。
Nutrients. 2024 Mar 5;16(5):738. doi: 10.3390/nu16050738.
7
Does 'portion size' matter? Brain responses to food and non-food cues presented in varying amounts.“份量大小”是否重要?大脑对不同份量的食物和非食物线索的反应。
Appetite. 2024 May 1;196:107289. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107289. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Effects of policies or interventions that influence the school food environment on children's health and nonhealth outcomes: a systematic review.影响学校食品环境的政策或干预措施对儿童健康和非健康结果的影响:系统评价。
Nutr Rev. 2024 Feb 12;82(3):332-360. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuad059.
9
Socioeconomic position and the influence of food portion size on daily energy intake in adult females: two randomized controlled trials.社会经济地位和食物份量对成年女性日常能量摄入的影响:两项随机对照试验。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023 Apr 27;20(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-023-01453-x.
10
Children with lower ratings of executive functions have a greater response to the portion size effect.执行功能评分较低的儿童对份量大小效应的反应更大。
Appetite. 2023 Jul 1;186:106569. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2023.106569. Epub 2023 Apr 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying behavioral phenotypes for childhood obesity.识别儿童肥胖的行为表型。
Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.021. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Daily Snacking Occasions and Weight Status Among US Children Aged 1 to 5 Years.美国 1 至 5 岁儿童的每日零食次数与体重状况。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jun;26(6):1034-1042. doi: 10.1002/oby.22172. Epub 2018 Apr 14.
3
Portion size and later food intake: evidence on the "normalizing" effect of reducing food portion sizes.份量大小与后续食物摄取量:减少食物份量大小的「正常化」效应之证据。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2018 Apr 1;107(4):640-646. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy013.
4
Snacking: A cause for concern.吃零食:一个值得关注的问题。
Physiol Behav. 2018 Sep 1;193(Pt B):279-283. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 5.
5
Brain response to food cues varying in portion size is associated with individual differences in the portion size effect in children.大脑对食物线索(不同份量)的反应与儿童份量效应个体差异有关。
Appetite. 2018 Jun 1;125:139-151. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.027. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
6
Interrelationships of child appetite, weight and snacking among Hispanic preschoolers.西班牙裔学龄前儿童的食欲、体重与吃零食之间的相互关系。
Pediatr Obes. 2018 Jan;13(1):38-45. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12186. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
7
Does milk matter: Is children's intake affected by the type or amount of milk served at a meal?牛奶重要吗:儿童的摄入量会受到用餐时所提供牛奶的类型或数量的影响吗?
Appetite. 2016 Oct 1;105:509-18. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
8
Double trouble: Portion size and energy density combine to increase preschool children's lunch intake.双重麻烦:食物分量和能量密度共同作用增加了学龄前儿童的午餐摄入量。
Physiol Behav. 2016 Aug 1;162:18-26. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.02.019. Epub 2016 Feb 12.
9
Impact of fruit juice and beverage portion size on snack intake in preschoolers.果汁和饮料份量对学龄前儿童零食摄入量的影响。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.025. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Individual differences in susceptibility to large portion sizes among obese and normal-weight children.肥胖和正常体重儿童对大份量食物的易感性存在个体差异。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Apr;23(4):808-14. doi: 10.1002/oby.21014. Epub 2015 Feb 13.