• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人类耳蜗畸形类型的大小和形状的变化。

Variations in the Size and Shape of Human Cochlear Malformation Types.

机构信息

MED-EL GmbH, Innsbruck, Austria.

出版信息

Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019 Oct;302(10):1792-1799. doi: 10.1002/ar.24136. Epub 2019 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1002/ar.24136
PMID:30980504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6767414/
Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine the variations in size and shape of the most widely recognized cochlear malformation types using three-dimensional (3D) visualization. Using 3D slicer freeware, the complete inner-ear structures were segmented from 46 anonymized high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) image datasets. Cochlear height, internal auditory canal height, and width were measured from the axial plane. Cochlear basal turn diameter was measured from the oblique coronal plane. Number of cochlear turns was measured from the 3D images and the corresponding cochlear duct length (CDL) was estimated using the CDL equations given in Alexiades et al. [Otol Neurotol 36 (2015) 904-907]. Out of 46 preoperative HRCT image datasets of human temporal bone, cochlear anatomy types including normal anatomy (4), enlarged vestibular aqueduct syndrome (3), cochlear aplasia (2), incomplete partition Types I (8), II (Mondini's deformity) (3), and III (X-linked) (4), cochlear hypoplasia (CH) (17), and common cavity (CC) (5) were identified. Majority of CH cases had cochlear height shorter than 4 mm whereas the CC cases measured cochlear height above 6 mm. For all the other malformation types, cochlear height was between 4 and 6 mm. In terms of "A" value, majority of CH cases showed shorter "A" value of <7.5 mm, which is in the lower end in comparison to the rest of the malformation types reported in this study. 3D-visualization shows the size and shape variations of all the structures of inner ear and also improves the clinicians' ability to visualize cochlear anatomy and nearby structures much easier than from the 2D image slices. Anat Rec, 302:1792-1799, 2019. © 2019 The Author. The Anatomical Record published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association for Anatomy.

摘要

本研究旨在使用三维(3D)可视化技术确定最广泛认可的耳蜗畸形类型的大小和形状变化。使用 3D Slicer 免费软件,从 46 份匿名高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)图像数据集的完整内耳结构进行分割。在轴平面上测量耳蜗高度、内听道高度和宽度。从斜冠状平面测量耳蜗基底转直径。从 3D 图像测量耳蜗转数,并使用 Alexiades 等人给出的 CDL 方程估计相应的耳蜗管长度(CDL)[Otol Neurotol 36(2015)904-907]。在 46 个人类颞骨术前 HRCT 图像数据集中,识别出包括正常解剖结构(4 例)、扩大前庭水管综合征(3 例)、耳蜗发育不全(2 例)、不完全分隔 I 型(8 例)、II 型(Mondini 畸形)(3 例)和 III 型(X 连锁)(4 例)、耳蜗发育不良(CH)(17 例)和共同腔(CC)(5 例)在内的耳蜗解剖类型。大多数 CH 病例的耳蜗高度短于 4 毫米,而 CC 病例的耳蜗高度超过 6 毫米。对于所有其他畸形类型,耳蜗高度在 4 到 6 毫米之间。在“A”值方面,大多数 CH 病例的“A”值较短,<7.5 毫米,与本研究报告的其他畸形类型相比处于较低端。3D 可视化显示了内耳所有结构的大小和形状变化,并且比从 2D 图像切片更能提高临床医生可视化耳蜗解剖结构和附近结构的能力。Anat Rec,302:1792-1799,2019。©2019 作者。解剖记录由 Wiley Periodicals,Inc. 代表美国解剖学协会出版。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/6da1507a4663/AR-302-1792-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/f0fa5f84c600/AR-302-1792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/54f717e60288/AR-302-1792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/310cad4dbd98/AR-302-1792-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/de6291cefd46/AR-302-1792-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/80b2ecd6fb58/AR-302-1792-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/6da1507a4663/AR-302-1792-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/f0fa5f84c600/AR-302-1792-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/54f717e60288/AR-302-1792-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/310cad4dbd98/AR-302-1792-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/de6291cefd46/AR-302-1792-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/80b2ecd6fb58/AR-302-1792-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/14ae/6767414/6da1507a4663/AR-302-1792-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Variations in the Size and Shape of Human Cochlear Malformation Types.人类耳蜗畸形类型的大小和形状的变化。
Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2019 Oct;302(10):1792-1799. doi: 10.1002/ar.24136. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
2
A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations.一种新的耳蜗前庭畸形分类法。
Laryngoscope. 2002 Dec;112(12):2230-41. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200212000-00019.
3
Evaluating Common Cavity Cochlear Deformities Using CT Images and 3D Reconstruction.使用 CT 图像和 3D 重建评估常见腔耳蜗畸形。
Laryngoscope. 2021 Feb;131(2):386-391. doi: 10.1002/lary.28640. Epub 2020 Apr 4.
4
Human Inner-ear Malformation Types Captured in 3D.以3D形式呈现的人类内耳畸形类型
J Int Adv Otol. 2019 Apr;15(1):77-82. doi: 10.5152/iao.2019.6246.
5
Diagnostic Value of 3D Segmentation in Understanding the Anatomy of Human Inner Ear Including Malformation Types.3D 分段对理解包括畸形类型在内的人类内耳解剖结构的诊断价值。
Ear Nose Throat J. 2021 Sep;100(5_suppl):675S-683S. doi: 10.1177/0145561320906621. Epub 2020 Feb 13.
6
Unpartitioned versus incompletely partitioned cochleae: radiologic differentiation.未分隔与不完全分隔的耳蜗:影像学鉴别
Otol Neurotol. 2004 Jul;25(4):520-9; discussion 529. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200407000-00020.
7
New Classification of Cochlear Hypoplasia Type Malformation: Relevance in Cochlear Implantation.耳蜗发育不全畸形的新分类:在人工耳蜗植入中的相关性。
J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):153-157. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7690.
8
A novel method of identifying inner ear malformation types by pattern recognition in the mid modiolar section.一种通过中耳蜗段的模式识别来识别内耳畸形类型的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20868. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00330-6.
9
[Mondini's deafness].[蒙迪尼耳聋]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi. 1997 Jan;11(1):6-8.
10
The diagnostic value of measurement of cochlear length and height in temporal bone CT multiplanar reconstruction of inner ear malformation.颞骨CT内耳畸形多平面重建中测量耳蜗长度和高度的诊断价值
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Feb;137(2):119-126. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1221132. Epub 2016 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating Additional Cochlear Parameters: A follow-up systematic review and meta-analysis.研究其他耳蜗参数:一项随访的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Otol. 2024 Jul;19(3):178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2024.03.001. Epub 2024 Oct 19.
2
The Cochlear Size Variations in Incomplete Partitions with Multiplanar Images on Pediatric Temporal Bone CT.小儿颞骨CT多平面图像上不完全分隔的耳蜗大小变异
Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul. 2023 Sep 29;57(3):426-433. doi: 10.14744/SEMB.2023.65725. eCollection 2023.
3
The effect of cochlear size on electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in deaf children.

本文引用的文献

1
Utility of OTOPLAN Reconstructed Images for Surgical Planning of Cochlear Implantation in a Case of Post-meningitis Ossification.OTOPLAN重建图像在脑膜炎后骨化病例人工耳蜗植入手术规划中的应用
Otol Neurotol. 2019 Jan;40(1):e60-e61. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002079.
2
Evaluation of the Normal Cochlear Second Interscalar Ridge Angle and Depth on 3D T2-Weighted Images: A Tool for the Diagnosis of Scala Communis and Incomplete Partition Type II.评估三维 T2 加权图像上正常耳蜗第二中嵴角和深度:用于诊断共同腔耳蜗和 II 型不完全分隔的工具。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;39(5):923-927. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5585. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
3
耳蜗大小对聋儿电诱发听觉脑干反应的影响。
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol. 2023 Feb 24;8(2):532-537. doi: 10.1002/lio2.1029. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Scala vestibuli cochlear implant supported by 3D modeling of the inner ear.基于内耳 3D 建模的耳蜗前庭植入物 Scalavest。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Mar;134(5-6):243-248. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01935-7. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
5
A novel cochlear measurement that predicts inner-ear malformation.一种新型的耳蜗测量方法,可预测内耳畸形。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 1;11(1):7339. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86741-x.
6
Automatic segmentation of inner ear on CT-scan using auto-context convolutional neural network.基于自上下文卷积神经网络的 CT 扫描内耳自动分割。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 23;11(1):4406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83955-x.
7
The rationale for FLEX (cochlear implant) electrode with varying array lengths.具有不同阵列长度的FLEX(人工耳蜗)电极的基本原理。
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 14;7(1):45-53. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2019.12.003. eCollection 2021 Jan.
8
Prevalence & features of inner ear malformations among children with congenital sensorineural hearing loss: A Public Cochlear Implant Centre Experience.先天性感音神经性听力损失儿童内耳畸形的患病率及特征:一家公共人工耳蜗植入中心的经验
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1511-1516. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3134.
9
New Classification of Cochlear Hypoplasia Type Malformation: Relevance in Cochlear Implantation.耳蜗发育不全畸形的新分类:在人工耳蜗植入中的相关性。
J Int Adv Otol. 2020 Aug;16(2):153-157. doi: 10.5152/iao.2020.7690.
Measuring cochlear duct length in Asian population: worth giving a thought!
测量亚洲人群的蜗管长度:值得思考!
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar;275(3):725-728. doi: 10.1007/s00405-018-4868-9. Epub 2018 Jan 13.
4
An overview of cochlear implant electrode array designs.人工耳蜗电极阵列设计概述。
Hear Res. 2017 Dec;356:93-103. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.10.005. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
5
Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations.内耳畸形的分类及当前管理。
Balkan Med J. 2017 Sep 29;34(5):397-411. doi: 10.4274/balkanmedj.2017.0367. Epub 2017 Aug 25.
6
Cochlear duct length-one size fits all?耳蜗管长度——一刀切可行吗?
Am J Otolaryngol. 2017 Mar-Apr;38(2):218-221. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
7
The new classification system for inner ear malformations: the INCAV system.内耳畸形的新分类系统:INCAV系统。
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Mar;137(3):246-252. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1247498. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
8
Cochlear Size and Shape Variability and Implications in Cochlear Implantation Surgery.耳蜗大小和形状的变异性及其在人工耳蜗植入手术中的意义
Otol Neurotol. 2016 Oct;37(9):1307-13. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001189.
9
The diagnostic value of measurement of cochlear length and height in temporal bone CT multiplanar reconstruction of inner ear malformation.颞骨CT内耳畸形多平面重建中测量耳蜗长度和高度的诊断价值
Acta Otolaryngol. 2017 Feb;137(2):119-126. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2016.1221132. Epub 2016 Aug 31.
10
Histopathology of inner ear malformations: Do we have enough evidence to explain pathophysiology?内耳畸形的组织病理学:我们是否有足够的证据来解释病理生理学?
Cochlear Implants Int. 2016;17(1):3-20. doi: 10.1179/1754762815Y.0000000016. Epub 2015 Jul 9.