• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

结肠镜筛查在儿童期癌症幸存者中的结直肠癌成本效益。

Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in Childhood Cancer Survivors.

出版信息

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1161-1169. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz060.

DOI:10.1093/jnci/djz060
PMID:30980665
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6855986/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) compared to the general population, especially those previously exposed to abdominal or pelvic radiation therapy (APRT). However, the benefits and costs of CRC screening in CCS are unclear. In this study, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of early-initiated colonoscopy screening in CCS.

METHODS

We adjusted a previously validated model of CRC screening in the US population (MISCAN-Colon) to reflect CRC and other-cause mortality risk in CCS. We evaluated 91 colonoscopy screening strategies varying in screening interval, age to start, and age to stop screening for all CCS combined and for those treated with or without APRT. Primary outcomes were CRC deaths averted (compared to no screening) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). A willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per life-years gained (LYG) was used to determine the optimal screening strategy.

RESULTS

Compared to no screening, the US Preventive Services Task Force's average risk screening schedule prevented up to 73.2% of CRC deaths in CCS. The optimal strategy of screening every 10 years from age 40 to 60 years averted 79.2% of deaths, with ICER of $67 000/LYG. Among CCS treated with APRT, colonoscopy every 10 years from age 35 to 65 years was optimal (CRC deaths averted: 82.3%; ICER: $92 000/LYG), whereas among those not previously treated with APRT, screening from age 45 to 55 years every 10 years was optimal (CRC deaths averted: 72.7%; ICER: $57 000/LYG).

CONCLUSIONS

Early initiation of colonoscopy screening for CCS is cost-effective, especially among those treated with APRT.

摘要

背景

与普通人群相比,儿童癌症幸存者(CCS)罹患结直肠癌(CRC)的风险增加,尤其是那些先前接受过腹部或盆腔放射治疗(APRT)的患者。然而,CCS 中 CRC 筛查的获益和成本尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们评估了早期结肠镜筛查在 CCS 中的成本效益。

方法

我们调整了美国人群中 CRC 筛查的验证模型(MISCAN-Colon),以反映 CCS 中的 CRC 和其他原因死亡率风险。我们评估了 91 种不同的结肠镜筛查策略,这些策略在筛查间隔、开始筛查的年龄和停止筛查的年龄方面有所不同,适用于所有 CCS 患者以及接受或未接受 APRT 治疗的患者。主要结果是与不筛查相比,避免的 CRC 死亡人数和增量成本效益比(ICER)。我们使用 100000 美元/LYG 的支付意愿阈值来确定最佳筛查策略。

结果

与不筛查相比,美国预防服务工作组的平均风险筛查方案可预防 CCS 中多达 73.2%的 CRC 死亡。最佳筛查策略为每 10 年从 40 岁到 60 岁筛查一次,可避免 79.2%的死亡,ICER 为 67000 美元/LYG。在接受 APRT 治疗的 CCS 中,从 35 岁到 65 岁每 10 年进行一次结肠镜检查是最佳策略(CRC 死亡人数减少:82.3%;ICER:92000 美元/LYG),而在未接受 APRT 治疗的患者中,最佳策略是从 45 岁到 55 岁每 10 年筛查一次(CRC 死亡人数减少:72.7%;ICER:57000 美元/LYG)。

结论

CCS 中早期开始结肠镜筛查具有成本效益,尤其是在接受 APRT 治疗的患者中。

相似文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Colonoscopy-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening in Childhood Cancer Survivors.结肠镜筛查在儿童期癌症幸存者中的结直肠癌成本效益。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Nov 1;111(11):1161-1169. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djz060.
2
The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.年轻人结直肠癌发病率上升对最佳筛查起始年龄的影响:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的 I 号微观模拟分析
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31543. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
4
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.在中低收入国家进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预算影响分析:来自泰国的例子。
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
5
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.对囊性纤维化患者进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):556-567.e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
6
Cost-Effectiveness and National Effects of Initiating Colorectal Cancer Screening for Average-Risk Persons at Age 45 Years Instead of 50 Years.45 岁而非 50 岁开始对一般风险人群进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和国家影响。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jul;157(1):137-148. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.023. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
7
Cost-effectiveness of screening for colorectal cancer in the general population.普通人群中结直肠癌筛查的成本效益
JAMA. 2000 Oct 18;284(15):1954-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.15.1954.
8
Cost-effectiveness of Screening Colonoscopy in Iranian High Risk Population.伊朗高危人群中结肠镜筛查的成本效益
Arch Iran Med. 2017 Sep;20(9):564-571.
9
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors Treated with Procarbazine and/or Infradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy.结直肠癌监测在接受丙卡巴肼和/或膈下放疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者中的成本效益。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Dec 5;31(12):2157-2168. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0019.
10
The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.45 岁及以上商业和医疗保险人群非侵入性基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查产品的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1219-1226. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260681. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The Children's Oncology Group Long-Term Follow-Up Guidelines for Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancers: A Review.儿童肿瘤学组关于儿童、青少年和青年癌症幸存者的长期随访指南:综述
JAMA Oncol. 2025 May 1;11(5):544-553. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.6812.
2
Gastrointestinal Cancer Precursor Conditions and Their Detection.胃肠道癌前状况及其检测。
Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2024 Aug;38(4):783-811. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 May 17.
3
International recommendations for screening and preventative practices for long-term survivors of transplantation and cellular therapy: a 2023 update.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal Adenomas and Cancers After Childhood Cancer Treatment: A DCOG-LATER Record Linkage Study.儿童癌症治疗后的结直肠腺瘤和癌症:DCOG-LATER 记录链接研究。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018 Jul 1;110(7):758-767. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djx266.
2
Colorectal cancer screening for average-risk adults: 2018 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.美国癌症协会 2018 年普通风险成年人结直肠癌筛查指南更新
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jul;68(4):250-281. doi: 10.3322/caac.21457. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
The impact of the rising colorectal cancer incidence in young adults on the optimal age to start screening: Microsimulation analysis I to inform the American Cancer Society colorectal cancer screening guideline.
国际移植和细胞治疗长期幸存者的筛查和预防建议:2023 年更新版。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024 Jun;59(6):717-741. doi: 10.1038/s41409-023-02190-2. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
4
International Recommendations for Screening and Preventative Practices for Long-Term Survivors of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy: A 2023 Update.国际移植和细胞治疗长期幸存者筛查和预防建议:2023 年更新版。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2024 Apr;30(4):349-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.12.001. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Survivorship care for patients curatively treated for Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a scoping review.霍奇金淋巴瘤和非霍奇金淋巴瘤根治性治疗患者的生存护理:一项范围综述
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 Apr;19(2):685-700. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01500-3. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
6
Critical gaps in understanding treatment outcomes in adolescents and young adults with lymphoma: A review of current data.青少年和青年淋巴瘤患者治疗结果认知中的关键差距:当前数据综述
EJHaem. 2023 Aug 25;4(4):927-933. doi: 10.1002/jha2.778. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
Early Onset Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Current Insights and Clinical Management of a Rising Condition.早期转移性结直肠癌:对一种日益常见疾病的当前见解与临床管理
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Jul 5;15(13):3509. doi: 10.3390/cancers15133509.
8
Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Surveillance in Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors Treated with Procarbazine and/or Infradiaphragmatic Radiotherapy.结直肠癌监测在接受丙卡巴肼和/或膈下放疗的霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者中的成本效益。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Dec 5;31(12):2157-2168. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0019.
9
Epidemiology and biology of early onset colorectal cancer.早发性结直肠癌的流行病学与生物学
EXCLI J. 2022 Jan 7;21:162-182. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-4456. eCollection 2022.
10
Ultrasound Image Features under Decomposition Algorithm to Analyze the Nursing Intervention on Patients with Colon Polyps Undergoing Endoscopic Resection.超声图像特征在分解算法下分析内镜切除术治疗结肠息肉患者的护理干预。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2021 Dec 15;2021:9581568. doi: 10.1155/2021/9581568. eCollection 2021.
年轻人结直肠癌发病率上升对最佳筛查起始年龄的影响:为美国癌症协会结直肠癌筛查指南提供信息的 I 号微观模拟分析
Cancer. 2018 Jul 15;124(14):2964-2973. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31543. Epub 2018 May 30.
4
Cystic Fibrosis Colorectal Cancer Screening Consensus Recommendations.囊性纤维化结直肠癌筛查共识推荐意见。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):736-745.e14. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.12.012. Epub 2017 Dec 29.
5
Lesions of All Types Exist in Colon Polyps of All Sizes.各种类型的病变存在于各种大小的结肠息肉中。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Feb;113(2):303-306. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2017.439. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
6
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.对囊性纤维化患者进行结直肠癌筛查的成本效益分析。
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):556-567.e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Infradiaphragmatic irradiation and high procarbazine doses increase colorectal cancer risk in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors.膈下照射和高剂量丙卡巴肼会增加霍奇金淋巴瘤幸存者患结直肠癌的风险。
Br J Cancer. 2017 Jul 25;117(3):306-314. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2017.177. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
8
High prevalence of adenomatous colorectal polyps in young cancer survivors treated with abdominal radiation therapy: results of a prospective trial.腹部放疗的年轻癌症幸存者中腺瘤性结直肠息肉的高发率:一项前瞻性试验的结果。
Gut. 2017 Oct;66(10):1797-1801. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-311501. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
9
Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force.结直肠癌筛查策略的益处、负担及危害评估:美国预防服务工作组的建模研究
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2595-609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.
10
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 21;315(23):2564-2575. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.5989.