Panum Group, Bethesda, MD.
Food and Nutrition Service, USDA, Alexandria, VA.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;109(Suppl_7):838S-851S. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy371.
During the Pregnancy and Birth to 24 Months Project, the USDA and US Department of Health and Human Services initiated an evidence review on diet and health in these populations.
The aim of these systematic reviews was to examine the relationships of never versus ever feeding human milk, shorter versus longer durations of any and exclusive human milk feeding, and feeding a lower versus a higher intensity of human milk to mixed-fed infants with diagnosed celiac disease and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
The Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review team (formerly called the Nutrition Evidence Library) conducted systematic reviews with external experts. We searched CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, and PubMed for articles published January, 1980 to March, 2016, dual-screened the results using predetermined criteria, extracted data from and assessed risk of bias for each included study, qualitatively synthesized the evidence, developed conclusion statements, and graded the strength of the evidence.
We included 9 celiac disease and 17 IBD articles. Limited case-control evidence suggests never versus ever being fed human milk is associated with higher risk of celiac disease, but concerns about reverse causality precluded a conclusion about the relationship of shorter versus longer durations of any human milk feeding with celiac disease. Evidence examining never versus ever feeding human milk and IBD was inconclusive, and limited, but consistent, case-control evidence suggests that, among infants fed human milk, shorter versus longer durations of any human milk feeding are associated with higher risk of IBD. For both outcomes, evidence examining the duration of exclusive human milk feeding was scant and no articles examined the intensity of human milk fed to mixed-fed infants.
Limited case-control evidence suggests that feeding human milk for short durations or not at all associates with higher risk of diagnosed IBD and celiac disease, respectively. The small number of studies and concern about reverse causality and recall bias prevent stronger conclusions.
在美国农业部和美国卫生与公众服务部的“怀孕和分娩至 24 个月项目”中,启动了一项针对这些人群饮食与健康的证据审查。
这些系统评价的目的是研究从未接受过母乳喂养与持续接受母乳喂养、任何母乳喂养时长较短与较长、混合喂养婴儿母乳喂养强度较低与较高与诊断为乳糜泻和炎症性肠病(IBD)之间的关系。
营养证据系统评价团队(原称营养证据库)与外部专家合作进行了系统评价。我们在 CINAHL、Cochrane、Embase 和 PubMed 中检索了 1980 年 1 月至 2016 年 3 月发表的文章,使用预定标准进行了双重筛选,从每个纳入的研究中提取数据并评估其偏倚风险,对证据进行定性综合,制定结论陈述,并对证据的强度进行分级。
我们纳入了 9 项乳糜泻和 17 项 IBD 研究。有限的病例对照证据表明,从未接受过母乳喂养与乳糜泻风险增加相关,但由于对反向因果关系的担忧,无法得出任何关于母乳喂养时长较短与较长与乳糜泻之间关系的结论。研究从未接受过母乳喂养与 IBD 之间关系的证据是不确定的,且有限,但一致的病例对照证据表明,在接受母乳喂养的婴儿中,任何母乳喂养时长较短与较长与 IBD 风险增加相关。对于这两个结局,关于母乳喂养时长的证据很少,也没有研究评估混合喂养婴儿的母乳喂养强度。
有限的病例对照证据表明,较短或完全不接受母乳喂养分别与较高的诊断 IBD 和乳糜泻风险相关。研究数量较少,以及对反向因果关系和回忆偏倚的担忧,阻止了更强有力的结论。